NoU

He still runs into Sakho. It's very clumsy, but the right decision I think. Glad that Sakho is not penalised for actually staying on his feet and trying to score.

I'm very happy for Carroll tbh.

Ulloa Got him. I also think those 4 will all make more points than ulloa, the next couple of games.

On that note - Wellbeck, Aguero, Pelle or Cisse to replace Balotelli?

So Cisse now has 4 goals in 151 minutes of football. I actually wasn't considering him, but them stats means you have to buy him.

Yeah, had a further read and you're right. As in the single player can't gain more than 0.3 or you as the player can't gain more than 0.3 from all your players combined through transfers?

Would it be possible to use the wildcard next round, sign players early you think will rise in value, and then when they do, you shift them for the players you really want (before september 13th) for the increase in moneys with no point lose?

Am I allowed to be exited for this match?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/teams/liverpool/11065221/Daniel-Agger-to-leave-Liverpool-for-Brondby-for-nominal-transfer-fee.html This is definitelv the steal of the summer. Why are we not trying to get him? he would be our best defender by some distance. Not more than a year ago that he refused Man City, and Barca has been interested up untill recently.

Is that bad? He is a talented player. He would probably cost more than he's worth right now, but nothing wrong in watching him.

Because our national coach is an idiot. no

Sturridge + someone else.

Not a midfielder in the FPL (you are probably playing another FF game). I wouldn't touch him anyway. I really think he will fall flat on his arse in the PL.

Ive toyed with the idea but cant bring myself to use him. Then who would be a cheap good mid other than Sigurdsson?

How do you guys feel about Sidwell for 5.5? Stoke has a lot of easy games to start and he should be getting goals IMO.

Why wouldn't they pay £37m for Mata? My thought exactly.

What nice move. I have huge respect for all parties involved (except us maybe).

I think the biggest problem with that sub is that we dont' have any better striker than Papiss to put on.

He is saying that we can use that to attack them on the wings. And that we should try to keep possession and attack them. That seems very positive and correct to me. Shame he isn't playing our only winger capable of doing that then. Sissoko, gouffran and santon can attack as well!? Anita and cabaye can attack and keep possession!? You're wrong. ok, sorry about that then.

He wants to have a positive outlook on the game, he doesn't want us to sit back and he wants us to pressure their flanks which he believes is a weakness because their wingers don't like defending . What a cunt eh? Yes I'm sure we'll press high and force City to defend. Can't wait to see if the team on the pitch actually sets up to do what Pardew claims they will. Why not? we did against Man utd.

He is saying that we can use that to attack them on the wings. And that we should try to keep possession and attack them. That seems very positive and correct to me. Shame he isn't playing our only winger capable of doing that then. Sissoko, gouffran and santon can attack as well!? Anita and cabaye can attack and keep possession!?

Pardew seems spot on tbh. He is not a Mourinho, but he is intelligent and honest.

He is saying that we can use that to attack them on the wings. And that we should try to keep possession and attack them. That seems very positive and correct to me.

Why!? I like him better that way.

the latter.