Rocker

Did you not know? The Club rang him yesterday and told him.

Arbitration was always going to completed this month. We've known that for ages.

Contributors Stuart Baird (Centrefield) Kieron Beal QC (Blackstone Chambers) Michael Beloff QC (Blackstone Chambers) Nick Bitel (Kerman & Co) Karim Bouzidi (Clintons) Alice Bricogne (2 Bedford Row) Richard Bush (Bird & Bird) Liz Coley (Walker Morris) Nick Cusack (PFA) Anita Davies (Matrix Chambers) James Eighteen (Charles Russell Speechlys) Jonathan Ellis (Charles Russell Speechlys) Paul Gilroy QC (9 St Johns Street) Edwin Glasgow QC (39 Essex Chambers) Tom Grant (Adelphi Sports) Christopher Jeans QC (11 KBW) James Kitching (Asian Football Association) Pedro Fida (Bichara & Motta - Brazil) Paul Fletcher (Adelphi Sports) Daniel Geey (Sheridans)

Bargain, that. 6 bedroomed houses in Brighton aren't cheap, ya kna.

Class. Cheers mate. Love a little plane spotting.

Poorly timed if that's the case like. A book about arbitration being uploaded in the week of (or leading up to) a huge arbitration case he's a part of.

Fucking hell. I would refuse to go on the pitch like that. Fucking disgrace.

It's the best forum by far. Have you frequented other forums? I wouldn't last 5 minutes. I've just had a little gander around and thank Christ we have this place. I'll never take it for granted again.

Love how our 'new' members all gravitate to the most divisive of topics immediately. It's almost like they've been here before.

But, but, defensive midfielders...

You can spot a cunt re-gen a mile off. Hence why he's already got a ban.

War chest.

It's by far a superior listen (not that it takes much) to the Wraith mong-a-long.

Not unless you mean patatas bravas or deep fried camembert.

Did you listen to the entire thing? He flip flops throughout. Towards the end of his piece about the takeover (about an hour in) he twice says the consortium are right to be confident due to the O&D being too vague to factor in the Saudi state and what that entails.

I listened to the entire thing yesterday and he's neither here nor there. He sits comfortably on the fence so he's neither right or wrong when the decision is finally made. The comments aren't really out of context though, it's not as if they've been manipulated. He just ends most positive comments with a negative caveat and vice versa.

Isn't that pretty much what's been said in this thread earlier though?

Depends who 'he' is.

It'll all be in public anyway, that one. You'll be able to watch it.

I mean, I'm an hour in and he's still not overly negative at all. At the hour mark, he's asked how he think it will play out and he says 'we have a strong chance'. Twice actually, as the O&D test isn't robust enough.

Still listening to the podcast, and Jacobs thinks the arbitration hearing will 99% be a private one.

What an infinitely better podcast. I mean, I wouldn't listen to it( regularly), but it isn't a gaggle of cunts flogging tacky merch and talking utter shite.