Spot the difference:
1) "I want to spend a bit more time with my family and see my kid play, so I am refusing to travel with the squad to away games should I not be starting."
2) "If I'm only going to be on the bench for half our games this season, then would it be possible for it to be home games? I want to spend a bit more time with my family and see my kid play."
We don't know that he has 'dictated' anything, though. He may have said to Pardew that it's a preference of his but at the end of the day he'll do whatever the manager tells him to. You're going way over the top.
He's been at the club for nearly 20 years and through nearly as many managers and he's suddenly a disgrace overnight. Mint.
Training doesn't even matter that much - look at Shola, king of the training field. Dogshit on matchdays when it counts. I personally couldn't give a fuck if Pardew's training sessions consisted of McDonalds and cuban cigars if we were still winning games every week.
Having said that, I think if that was reality then Nolan may have dug his heels in a lot more.
Harper has been in the game a long time and has been at the club for longer than nearly everyone - he's well within his rights to ask. Pardew is well within his rights to say 'fuck that' and Harper would then have to back down. I don't see the issue.
Not at all, be pretty scary if Brunt (same starting letter and number of letters) skied a late penalty over the bar like a buffoon to allow the knackers a point though.
If that's so then Harper is as big a disgrace as Tevez.
no he isn't. If Pardew has said that they'll be taking it in turns for bench duty/reserve games, I'd say it's perfectly reasonable for Harper to then voice that he'd rather be on the bench for the home games so he can watch his kids play every other weekend. Pardew could obviously then choose to ignore it and Harper would have to accept it either way, but comparing that to the Tevez situation is laughable.