That Ladbrokes "money back if both teams score" is fantastic psychology. BTTS? Course, that'll happen. That's the positive outcome. My bet's always open if I go with BTTS. This sure-fire confidence in both teams scoring will probably lead to a more ambitious bet, which will lead to you not winning, leading to the £25 free bet, leading to you putting in on an equally audacious selection because it's "free".
Look at that Man Utd team. Who is scoring?
They may well score but it's potentially a genius idea from Ladbrokes.
After all the hopes of big wins yesterday, mixed with fears I'd be heading for a disaster, I actually ended up with the more boring outcome albeit a good one, of a modest but decent enough profit.
Fancy Chelsea today.
Feels like everyone around us wins every single week. Think this is the first weekend in a while where someone has dropped points where you wouldn't expect them to (Liverpool). Guess Man Utd shouldn't get anything later, point at most. He says.
It'd be nice if Spurs could stop winning.
I've been a big critic of Lucas in the past and while I still don't think he's as good as many will have you believe, the role he plays for Liverpool is vital and without him playing that role, they look completely and utterly vulnerable with those 2 goons in the middle. Gerrard is careless/reckless to the extreme while Henderson just isn't very good full stop (albeit he's improved in the past 6 months, and may continue to).
Worse? He's been laughably bad in this game and in 45 minutes has summed up his decline.
Absolutely no way Gerrard should be playing regularly if Liverpool have aspirations of getting near the leaders.
When it was 2-0 Arsenal and 4-1 Man City, things were looking rosy.
Now, all I can hope for is Liverpool to score twice.
Thankful my earlier bets came in as otherwise I'd be staring at a heavy loss.
They're still total cunts either way.