Look, if you're happy to spend £600-1000 a season to watch a football team that is simply incidental to a transfer investement fund, then go ahead.
What is wrong with wanting to sign players because they are good to watch and not thinking about re-sale value. What does that matter to fans? We are not running the club so why do people take this Football Manager-like view, as if we pass on one player, the club will announce 'hey lads, we've saved a few bob, who should we get?'
The club will make decisions regardless of what we think (and has shown this consistently) so why should people get het up about finances? Can you not just look forward to the football?
It's fair enough if people don't rate Defoe, everyone can have an opinion on him as a player- but we shouldn't go around discounting players because we are unhappy with the impact on our free cash flow for the year. And nor does that mean anyone suggesting spending some money thinks that it all grows on trees and is disciple of Peter Ridsdale.
Just think the club shouldn't be puching above it's weight in an unsustainable manner. That view isn't particularly detrimental to my enjoyment either. I mean, I think we've been very frugal this transfer window and have made small steps forward. Consequently I'm looking forward to the start of the season, hoping we play stronger over the course of this season than the previous.
I think we're both on the same page, yours is just half full.