Agree and I don't think many would argue argainst. Its just the way its articulated in sports other than football is often a lot better.
Yeah, I definitely wasn't saying they should be above criticism, but that criticism should be from the appropriate people and based on a realistic level of expectation.
Players argue against most decisions that goe against them, it's only sometimes they happen to be right.
If you want to compare it to work, it's a bit like someone bollocking their own boss in the middle of a meeting in front of a room of people. Not advisable.
In my view the referee is senior to the players, the have to authority to question him during the game.
Referee's don't have a clue because they've never played the game, so how can they know what it's actually like on the otherside. I honestly believe 50% of all decisions in some games are incorrect on fouls, which is a shocking figure.
Absolute bollocks.
"I honestly believe (i.e. I've plucked this out of the air) _____________ ... which is a shocking figure". :lol:
Jesus Christ man Neesy. What the fuck am I reading here?