jdckelly

must be an injury

anita for tiote, thats a loss

max valuation if we sell them

luckily for us thus far Chelsea have been just as clueless in our half

probably not otherwise how could clubs throughout the land take any banner they don't want? Obstruction of advertising, signs etc...holding a paper up or even just taking it in to the ground, na. it is a private business at the end of the day they can set whatever restrictions on whats allowed in that they feel like

probably not otherwise how could clubs throughout the land take any banner they don't want?

It'll be much easier for them if they have the access that they had before the ban but I've seen nothing worth reading until now. I don't want to read what Shola or Taylor has to say after a defeat. obviously other people do otherwise they wouldn't have kept doing it. We'll see in the long term but I do expect they'll be allowed back in and after a brief period where they proclaim victory and a new dawn of harder hitting questions directly to the hierarchy probably some fluff pieces with Pardew and some board member, things return back to players talking nonsense and whatever quotes people are getting angry at Pardew over at the time. I'm perfectly willing to be proven completely wrong of coarse.

ugh I withdraw anything positive I may have implied about O'Neill being the best we could get etc since he apparently wants Roy fucking Keane involved as his no2.

Didn't know that! only 4 games according to wiki so pretty easy to miss

The direct access will be virtually worthless anyway as they'll have enough access by attending games and they'll reproduce what other get from press conferences. then why haven't they done something like this before? Why all the kid glove stuff towards the club? Its obviously worth something otherwise they wouldn't be so non critical of Ashley and co when theres been plenty to take a stand over previously.

Since Mourinho was the manager who bombed him out of Milan it's probably unlikely. he'd left inter before Santon was loaned out or sold by them.

doesn't seem overly likely to me, more likely just made up based on we're playing chelsea that reminded the idiot reporter he used to play for Mourinhio and maybe he'd play for him again! Everybody else just ran with it since hey Mike Ashleys company is saying it (same logic as the ridiculous Rooney story in the summer)

What I was getting at is that they aren't taking a stance over money, they wouldn't be doing what they are currently doing if they weren't banned. its interlinked they're doing because they were banned to make up the revenue they'd lose from not having direct access to the club.

obviously they're doing it for the money they have a business to keep running and these are hard times for most papers let alone local ones. The one noticeable thing is as of yet theres not actually been much they haven't printed before (except for the outrage at ban articles which are to be expected) and certainly no kind of actual investigations into things that need answering (Sports direct adverts not being paid for, how much competition was there actually for the main sponsorship, what the hell does Kinnear do, does the money from the online club shop actually go to the clubs coffers or to sports direct? etc) maybe these will come in time but I have my doubts.

how the hell can Ryder put getting of Barton or Nolan into the same category as what else Ashleys done?

bit hard for sky to show it since its on BT

Could be true if the centre half injury plague is to be believed. will probably be on the bench for lack of any other fit defenders I guess the good-ish news is that Chelsea don't really have any battering ram type Lukaku strikers to hurt us with tomorrow, but you don't really need that type of striker to beat inexperienced/disorganised centre-halves, and then they have the likes of Terry and Cahill on corners etc... and then you have skillful players like Mata, Osc-... y'know what, I think I'm just going to stop here we could do with cloning Tiote a few times to deal with those attacking midfielders of theirs

a way to make more money, expect every major club to start following this idea

Could be true if the centre half injury plague is to be believed. will probably be on the bench for lack of any other fit defenders

So does that mean revenue from the 'Official NUFC Club shop' website is now going to SD.com?? no ones sure, could be as simple as outsourcing the construction and operation of the website to them

http://www.theguardian.com/football/2013/nov/01/martin-oneill-republic-of-ireland-manager?CMP=twt_gu best we could probably hope for

anyway question how many different groups were invited to this thing in the first place?

still not much in the way of going after real problems but we'll see in time.

Newcastle 0-2 Chelsea Fulham 1-2 Man Utd Hull City 1-0 Sunderland Man City 2-0 Norwich Stoke City 0-1 Southampton West Brom 2-0 Crystal Palace West Ham 0-1 Aston Villa Arsenal 2-2 Liverpool Everton 2-1 Tottenham Cardiff City 1-1 Swansea

not sure how true Andy Hudson ‏@HuddoHudson 19m @milesstarforth I thought it was (is) open & transparent. I was told club requested mins go public on their site first. All agreed but 1 org