raises a fair point tbh, why should they let him go on the cheap just because hes at blackpool, if bents worth 18m then why shouldn't blackpool hold out for as much cash as they can get
Because he isn't worth that much? It's not because he's at Blackpool as to why he should go cheap, it's the fact that he's at Blackpool so if he was actually worth so much money, he wouldn't be there in the first place (with all due respect to them )
other club fans might say the same about tiote or ac9. to blackpool adam is worth a s*** load just because they were smart enough to spot a talent on the cheap and nurture it doesn't mean hes worth f*** all
I'm not saying he is worth fuck all, but he's not worth as much as Holloway seems to think. I don't think a £4m bid is that much of 'an insult' to them either, and the Bent stuff he was spouting the other day is bollocks too. Just because you spend £18m on one player, doesn't mean you spent £18m on every player you want.
fact is blackpool will have their valuation of adam its up to other clubs to meet it, if they don't blackpool won't sell. and an opening bid of 3m for adam by villa is pretty insulting