Jump to content

Anderson

Member
  • Posts

    25,445
  • Joined

Everything posted by Anderson

  1. Aye, could/should have been about 4 goals already.
  2. He couldn't dislodge Diame or Shelvey from the side and Rafa never saw him as a 10, which some have noted is the position he plays in for the Spain U21's. So he had a drama queen moment as he was out of the team, off he went when just a bit of patience at 21 would have seen him play a fuck load for us this season, meh.
  3. Just realised if it goes down to the last day, guaranteed Mitro will shithouse one in on 90 minutes.
  4. Anderson

    Sunderland

    Forever bleating on that they're a big(ger) club, yet simultaneously cry-arsing at the total lack of interest in their plight. The mackem paradox.
  5. Was looking back at some of the stuff from that time the other day. Ironically some of the best days on this place, despite the absolute grimness of NUFC at the time.
  6. https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/premier-league/newcastle/takeover-update-stavely-pif-bein-b1794267.html
  7. Mental he’s being allowed to bring in another coach at the moment. Hardly suggests he’ll be out a job soon.
  8. Going on as if we’ve been on the wrong end of an unlucky 1-0 to Man City. :lol:
  9. Why? They didn't look at it because Schar touched it Yeah, that's right. Schar leaves it Watkins naturally would put it in, no goal. Blame Schar for being thick ?? This is a fucking ridiculous take.
  10. Aye, Sky still insistent re: Schar’s touch. Absolutely lunacy if that’s the case. Villa’s last week was dodgy, but Schar only plays that ball because Watkin’s is behind him. Would be furious if I cared about us getting a result. As it stands, furious as it’s Bruce’s excuse served up on a platter.
  11. Carragher still insistent it’s onside because of Schar’s touch.
  12. Behind the ball. Hadn’t even clocked this. Commentary suggesting it’s because of Schar’s touch ffs.
×
×
  • Create New...