Wallsendmag

Remember it's down to everyone to ensure this is a success. I've managed to convince 2 season ticket holders from work who were planning on attending to boycott Spurs (it took some doing for one of them!) and I'm still working on another one who reckons he's still going. I'm going to show him that TF video on my phone later. If that doesn't work I'll have to threaten him.

Couldn't care less about the result so I won't give a prediction. Official attendance 47,259 Actual attendance 36,341

Added to that it's live in Sky so you can watch it anyway. People can still go out in the drink with their mates but just stop in the pub instead of watching that sh*t. It's hardly a chore missing one game that everyone can watch anyway in the grand scheme of things.

There's a thread on their forum mocking us for only taking 800 fans to Liverpool, with them congratulating themselves saying they'd take much more than that until about 6 pages in (aye a thread about our away following really did generate as much interest) mentions that they only took 714 to Anfield last season, not to mention the 619 to Goodison a few years previous. They really are a bunch of right thick tw@ts mind.

You could pick a team from the Conference, any one, and they would give Liverpool a harder game than they're getting tonight.

They won't go down. They were in a far worse position this time last season with even more difficult fixtures to play and stayed up. The 3 that's there now will more than likely go down but if one of them stops up it'll be at the expense of Hull.

Same here. 3 wins in 22, and in a relegation dogfight so let's organise a plane. Small time in the extreme and will cement what we've always known about them. Beating Newcastle is all that matters, the other 36 games are irrelevant. Glad we didn't go down this route when we were regularly beating them but it shows the difference in priorities between the two sets of fans.

It's the likes of you that the non boycotters need to be taking a look at. Well done sir! On the positive side there's still literally 1000's upon 1000's of unsold seats for Spurs which shows the uptake of general sale tickets has been very poor so if (and it's a big if) a lot if season ticket holders boycott it could look pretty sparse on telly.

Haha that's Paullys dad!

Not too bothered about it only because there's bigger things to worry about but it just goes to underline the total lack of professionalism and the general couldn't care less attitude running throughout the squad. Imagine the likes of Roy Keane or Tony Adams congratulating an opposition player for scoring a goal against them in any game let alone a derby. It just wouldn't happen. As a side note it's been sad to see the decline of Krul over the years. He was better as a 17 year old 10 years ago than he is now.

Here's the template our lot need to follow; http://m.bleacherreport.com/articles/2406338-ac-milan-fan-protests-may-accelerate-sale-talk-for-club

This match doesn't really count as it's only a bonus game so I'm not really sure why Sky are showing it.

When I first started going Arthur Cox was the manager so nice seen a fair few managers come and go but Carver us without doubt the worst of the lot. Never seen such an uninterested, disorganised looking rabble in my life. I could quite easily see us go for the rest if the season without even scoring another goal. The Ardiles times were grim but it was basically a team full of kids and the football was pretty exciting at times.

Yet these same fans will boo the team off each half such is their backing lol that's what f***ing gets me. If anyone dares to lose the ball "f*** off useless c***!' yeah supporting the lads tbh Exactly. We're hardly the most supportive crowd these days anyway so whether there's 10k or 50k there to support the players it matters not a bit. Then there's the question of whether the players deserve any support anyway after the latest cowardly performance from them (and the head coach). And besides all this I couldn't care less if we do get relegated. The last 3 seasons of PL football have been soul destroying anyway plus if we did go down Ashley would lose a boat load of money and his sports shop wouldn't get the same global exposure on telly which would please me. In fact I can't see any negatives to a boycott. The only problem is you only need to look around SJP on a match day to see that most of the gutless b******s in the stands these days haven't hot the gumption to do it.

I'm a season ticket holder and I won't be going. Didn't bother with the last home game either.

Pulled in a crowd of 1,453 for their match against Whitley Bay tonight.

Just been reading about the Blackpool fans attacking the directors box last night. Hmmm.

Would be great to get Rangers fans on board. Let's face it they're far more proactive than we are.

Would be nice to think that a 5th straight loss to them could be the catalyst to better things and finally get the fans off their backside and do something about this. A bit like when they beat us in the play offs in 1990 it could turn out to be a massive blessing in disguise.

£52 or you can get a severely restricted view where you can barely see the pitch at the back of the away end for £47. Pretty sure they've got those prices the wrong way round.

Great idea. Should have been done years ago. I'll definitely take part in this but no doubt there'll still be 40,000+ sheep inside the ground by kick off.

Bollocks. It's people like you who turn forums like this into one-dimensional echo chambers. We've got people claiming the media are biased and not representing the true fan at the very same time I just watched Look North vox-boxing a fan coming out of the SOL and giving Ashley both barrells, summing up in a few words what the issue is - "nothing will change until Ashley is gone" or words to that effect. You've clearly not read a single one of my posts, otherwise you wouldn't be claiming I write drivel - it won't take anyone long to figure out my posts are pretty much consistent with what that fan said. But I'll tell you what, "Wallsend Mag", I'd certainly prefer to have a drink with an open minded mackem than 10 Mags who think like you - where anyone who posts anything slightly off message is "clearly a Mackem troll". I'd tell you to f*** right off for that blatant insult, if I didn't think that's exactly the reaction you were probably hoping for. You're a Mackem troll. End of. You sign up the day after you beat us and then post all this rubbish to try and get a bite. Near enough 100 posts in your first 24 hours? Thank god the schools are back next week. You're a waste of my time and energy, end of. You're probably the sort of fan who accuses their mam of being a Mag if she serves you red sauce. In my experience, the only people who try to insult posters on a web forum by claiming they're on their school holidays, is your common garden troll. If you've got anything to say in your defence, or if you can actually come up with an example of anything I've said that's even remotely as trollish as your efforts here, let's hear it. If your next move is going to be just another tedious remark, don't bother. theres a clue. He's let his guard down a few times now the thick twat.

Bollocks. It's people like you who turn forums like this into one-dimensional echo chambers. We've got people claiming the media are biased and not representing the true fan at the very same time I just watched Look North vox-boxing a fan coming out of the SOL and giving Ashley both barrells, summing up in a few words what the issue is - "nothing will change until Ashley is gone" or words to that effect. You've clearly not read a single one of my posts, otherwise you wouldn't be claiming I write drivel - it won't take anyone long to figure out my posts are pretty much consistent with what that fan said. But I'll tell you what, "Wallsend Mag", I'd certainly prefer to have a drink with an open minded mackem than 10 Mags who think like you - where anyone who posts anything slightly off message is "clearly a Mackem troll". I'd tell you to f*** right off for that blatant insult, if I didn't think that's exactly the reaction you were probably hoping for. You're a Mackem troll. End of. You sign up the day after you beat us and then post all this rubbish to try and get a bite. Near enough 100 posts in your first 24 hours? Thank god the schools are back next week. You're a waste of my time and energy, end of. You're probably the sort of fan who accuses their mam of being a Mag if she serves you red sauce. In my experience, the only people who try to insult posters on a web forum by claiming they're on their school holidays, is your common garden troll. If you've got anything to say in your defence, or if you can actually come up with an example of anything I've said that's even remotely as trollish as your efforts here, let's hear it. If your next move is going to be just another tedious remark, don't bother. Do you think Advocaat will stay on next season if he keeps you up?

If they did (which I doubt), it can only have been based on blind hope. There was absolutely nothing in Ashley's record to suggest it would be anything other than Carver or a donkey like Steve Bruce. Not sure what you mackems have got against Bruce. He done a steady job but his derby record and the fact he's from up here are the only reasons I can think of why you lot would never give him a chance. You've been fighting relegation ever since sacking him.