andycap

He's such a lazy player which is a huge problem when your a defender. When your a striker you can get away with it.

Carsley is the man like. he's not scared to try different formations and drop big personnel to fit his systems.

Pickford was nowhere too be seen.

One time then 😂

The one thing I hate about Bellingham is his feigning of fouls when he's been dispossesed.

Pickford didn't need to be good against us as we never hit the target.

Thinks he's a good player does pickford 😂

Is that napoleon? 😂

It stated in the Samuel article that six clubs sided with them. 11 conspirators take Ipswich Southampton out the equation. So I reckon Arsenal Spurs Man utd Westham Palace Liverpool Brighton Wolves Bournemouth Fulham Brentford

He'd do a better job on our right flank than the chuckle brothers we've got playing there.

Anyone got the Samuel article archive? I couldn't open the one a few pages back.

Every club that has been taking over by a mega rich owner have had the chance to splurge there money about and have a crack at getting too the top. We haven't which is bollocks man utd arsenal Liverpool have all had there time at the top with wealthy owners now we should.

It's weird we can't seem to get our strikers involved in our setup. Isak is a superstar yet barely is in games or gets chances created for him this year I wonder what we've changed as it's basically the same team.

Should start playing for the under 21s if his minutes are gonna be none existent. I believe last season hall should of been playing for them aswell keep the fitness high.

I'm sure gordon would understand man he struggles against them especially at goodison.

Against Wimbledon he was spinning in behind but wasn't getting found. And he played alright surely a fifthteen minute run out isn't too much for him. Howe seems to take off Barnes tonali Hall etc as his easy subs whether they play well or not I'm noticing.

The penalty should of been giving to schar or Barnes players not under severe pressure from the crowd.

Barnes is our game winner keep him on he finishes like a proper striker.

Which is wrong when he could change a game when needed.

I just wish we'd switch it up now and again go orthodox wingers and a big man in the middle just something different. Taking off your finisher for a winger who tries but has no end product then Murphy for Willock it's not his type of game at all.

If you don't have a striker then Barnes must complete the full 90 mind.

Poor subs in my book no plan to get at them except the same get it out wide no quality. Neglecting our only recognised striker for more of the same.

Don't understand our thinking they are sitting in a low block Willock is basically a wasted sub. Get big willy on.

The games setup for a raker to win it problem is Barnes is off.

Our goal threat been taken off madness.