r0cafella

Every clip I see posted from cbs looks like they hit it out of park mind.

Has none of the clubs other favourite journalists chimed in on Edwards exclusive? I wonder if he’s jumped the gun.

Do you think Eddie still feels the same way ?

I love Eddie but I take what he says with a handful of salt.

Way too expensive now for us.

That’s the one thank you sir.

The reports at the time towards the end of the loan was Eddie not been too keen on Targett and we wanted Brunos other mate (I can’t remember his name). He’s going to be hard to shift if he’s in a 100k a week anarl.

It’s a strange one because at the time it was a no brainer, but the injuries and the massive salary (if true) make it look a bit mad now.

Yeah and that’s the issue we face this year, can we get rid of bit part players and free up so money to reinvest. as the club themselves have pointed out, we simply have to player trade so it’s a case of picking our poison as best we can.

It’s really interesting, in Targett and Wilson you have two players who I’d be absolutely gagging to get rid of to create some PSR Leeway. These are two players who aren’t going to improve or be first choice and absolute prime candidates to move on this FFP constricted world.

Arsenal are a club looking to take the step to becoming a tier 1 side. If Mbappe is off to Madrid who higher than Arsenal would be in for him? In terms of a fee, we would definitely listen to offers at say 120m. 200m is never happening again.

Yeah the Arsenal thing confuses me a bit I keep hearing conflicting information about how the finances are for them. according to the athletic this is where they are. In the Premier League profit and sustainability regulations (PSR), clubs are permitted to make overall losses no greater than £105million over a three-season period. Although Arsenal’s combined losses exceed this figure, the leeway clubs were granted as a consequence of the pandemic means they are still in a relatively comfortable position. There has been significant expenditure since then and Arsenal have indicated that financial regulations were a factor in their decision not to enter the January transfer market. This may have been to ensure they could spend significantly in the summer of 2024. that being said, I do feel they have the pulling power if they can finance the deal.

Wouldn’t worry, the sources quoted here would be laughed off if it was bad news.

Yea absolutely, for me though if we take an option which still requires extensive balloting at the end of it we’ve failed in what we should have been trying achieve.

Guys, Guler isn’t coming here as he wasn’t last year. Don’t waste your energy.

You can be banned for a season too, this had happened before but it takes a few serious breaches. PSG are the perfect example, they’ve lost 600m euro in the last 3 years yet here we are. They had Messi Neymar and Mbappe on payroll ffs.

Some of them are and they are punished accordingly. The big difference here is Uefa isn’t so draconian with punishments. The premier league has only recently become so draconian because of our emergence. As you will note the league was silent when Chelsea and City were doing it. Basically the big boys club is full now so something had to be done.

What’s the source for this relaxing or related party stuff?

Yes because it stops the mega clubs running away into the distance. It limits how far ahead they can get.

Wow I’m shocked they agreed to it, the proposal is as stupid as FFP lol.

FFP for you but not for me, the sky 6 classic.

I mean a regulator makes no sense if your the PL or its members, why have someone else influence your business?

That rule won’t be changing.

I’m a bit concerned the the fa haven’t issued any punishments.

Just give the ball to Isak, he will sort it.