r0cafella

He's just protecting his own interests the rules aren't fair nor logical.

100% he does.

Aye we've got little to no choice tbh, I think the fee is high but he's the profile we need and it's in short supply. But given the two clubs at the table (the last two with the prom invite and no date) we are getting bent over. It is what it is.

5/10 must do better.

Hmmm feels like we are being bent over here. Also in this market isak should be closer to 200m

They are expected too, doesn't say how much they are expecting to offer. Really confused how they are affording this, I guess the reporting was wrong.

Thanks for the correction I couldn't remember the exact price. Slightly concerning he's barely kicked on since we were last linked. Feels like a downgrade on Schar which is disappointing.

Como had this done at 20m euro E Earlier this window iirc

To add on, we better have a back up option because it went put all out eggs in the guehi basket again for it not to come off again then that would be rather stupid.

Only works if Guehi wants to come mind. Expect he will just sit it out at palace personally. Konate will go next summer and I think VVD is pretty much finished tbh.

Proper cartel shill is Ornstein.

Sounds fanciful at best. Not really believable given PIF love of overpaying for players from the PL.

The proposal for squad coat has sales amortized over 3 years iirc.

We still need revenue, regardless but under the current rules we can book the sale in the next financial year no issue.

Squad cost hasn't passed the vote as of yet.

It makes sense on specific circumstance. If he only wants to go to Liverpool and he's aware Liverpool aren't willing to pay the going rate (I actually think the going rate should be way north of 150 personally). When you look at it through that lens it makes perfect sense. Everyone else has spent up reducing the bidding. It can work out for the player too as as a lower fee might allow him to demand higher salary /bonuses.

Can never count out Chelsea

Sky will have Liverpool and Newcastle fans tuned in so it's a win for them.

It wouldn't be an issue to just do all of our spending in this financial year and sell him in the next one. It's a 3 year cycle after all. Obviously involves a degree of risk as if Isak were to get seriously injured the price could be impacted.

Aye, given Murphy and elanga are both very much suppliers he'd bang them in I reckon.

Id prefer Samu if we can't get Sesko.

Itk alert.

It's a clear contradiction indeed.

Let's see how it plays out, the offer they made was derisory and not worthy of considering. If they came back with say 130 +10 let's see if we have the same resolve. Again we shouldn't be selling to them period and with no exception, this is the second summer those cunts have derailed. I wouldn't do any deals with them period.