r0cafella

Will sesko settle for being a rotation option at a Europa league side?

In terms of FFP totally fine. They have massive revenues and that sweet harry Kane FFP margin. For spurs, the issue has generally been the owners don’t spend up to the limit iirc.

Oh, I’ve read all those quotes from those firms before, on here as well I’m sure. I commented not long ago that populous keep pitching for the job That being said, fair play I’m glad you found it worthwhile.

The article is just everything that’s been discussed on here. Let’s see in a couple of weeks when the study is released.

They are meant to be but they have players who they can offload for decent fees ESR probably being the prime candidate. Also the new FFP rules are great for Arsenal when they come in.

Indeed it can’t, whatever is decided we will have a lot of unhappy people mind.

I think we know expansion is possible, it’s just expensive for what we get and doesn’t resolve issues regarding lack of facilities/ opening new revenue streams.

Haha, personally I don’t think we will go for a Cm this summer, if we do though I’d imagine it’d because Bruno has gone.

Chelsea are meant to want 50m for him, paying that for what would be a squad player would obviously be madness. Let’s focus on resources on area we are more in need of.

The fact they did the same with Rice last year is probably why they feel so entitled.

Isn’t that what Tonali is?

Conor Gallagher could never replace what Bruno gives us.

For sure, I mean his piece is obviously a pre cursor to it and speculating regarding the outcome. I hope they publish the study so we can all draw our own conclusions as well.

Thanks for sharing but nothing which hasn’t been debated endlessly since on here.

It’s that time of year where the press pick random name and pick random number and put them in a sentence, I wouldn’t worry too much.

Paul Mitchell seems a good fit on the face of it. Only potential negative is the amount of jobs he’s had, could end up back in an Ashworth situation

Gallagher would be such a poor use of our limited resources.

This is obviously false, FFP is the great protector which stops clubs from going bust.

I think we need to make a distinction here; FMV is only a thing for related party transactions, anything which isn’t related party would be deemed FMV by default. So, although Fabinho was an overpay in my opinion, in actuality he went for his actual value which was what some mug was willing to pay. For ASM, his transfer with obviously influence by FMV, but with that being said, we didn’t get any better offers.

Me too, we need him to shine so can we cash in.

Aye, giving Manchester another tax payer funded stadium has to be an absolute no go in the eyes of any government. It makes literally no sense and provides tax payers with zero value.

Aye, can play the last 20 minutes when Isak is tired.

All of which we will get the most from a related party deal. We simply don’t have the same pull as the big 6. When the premier league was booming we were relevant for one season. The rest we were scratching around almost getting relegated.

Which other avenues? You think anyone was offering more than say Sela or Noon?

Your missing the point, we could have though, the point tcd is making is inflated sponsors would occur via linked parties, nobody in the right mind would give us such valuations. If anything our owners have shown they are extremely happy to play ball, to me it appears we are a legit investment for them and not a PSG or a city.