-
Posts
7,999 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Cf
-
Odd sub.
-
Murphy should have had an assist there.
-
These are really shit. Think we'll do them in the second half.
-
All hail VAR. Always liked it.
-
Good by Hall. Pass forwards didn't quite come off but recovered well.
-
Gordon does seem to lack that final pass at times.
-
He's off.
-
Fucks sake.
-
Good defending there shepherding him into a safe position.
-
How the fuck did that not go in???
-
How can an offside flag be broken?
-
3 points. 1 point here isn't good enough for top 4.
-
Big game this. League feels strong this year, and despite not a great start in terms of performances our position is decent. Anyone who falls away from the top 4 I don't think will be catching up easily. This is the sort of game that if you're not winning it you aren't finishing top 4.
-
That was a blatant a penalty as you'll ever see. Not even one game into the weekend and we have our VAR controversy already. What's the point of it?
-
We did what we needed to do and we are through. I'd have expected a bit more though. They were clearly there with no intention to win and just minimise the damage. But PL teams will do this too and this was a good chance to show we could beat the park the bus tactics and I didn't see anything to suggest we could against L2 opposition never mind PL.
-
Longstaff could have had an incredibly pointless red card there.
-
That looked painful.
-
Well now Wimbledon have to attempt to play football we might get some more out of this.
-
Just imagine we won all of these.
-
140 pages
-
What do you think VAR is? It's literally a human being watching a replay. People talk about "the technology". Apart from the semi-auto offside still to come the rest of it is a human being's opinion having watched a video replay. Something we could have been doing 20+ years ago. If the argument is "Video cameras are awesome" then yes I agree. I disagree with "Using video cameras to re-referee games is awesome".
-
VAR is the issue as the whole point of it is it's human's operating it. Remove the humans and you don't have VAR.
-
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cjd5l8ll7zko 2 things to call out here. "I have no choice. He's put me in an awful position. Dec, you need to go I'm afraid." Dec? Fuck off. You're the referee. He's not your mate. And in terms of the Bournemouth goal... "The VAR looked at this and decided that, in his professional opinion, that was in the area of the arm that has to be penalised below the bottom of the armpit. That's the important reference point. I don't think that's conclusive enough to intervene. "Equally, if the goal had been disallowed by the on-field officials, I don't think there's evidence here to say that there's no handball either. So again, it goes back to referee's call. It's an important concept. And for those factual matters you need evidence. It's very clear that the on-field call is wrong, I don't think we have it here." The ref clearly can't see where the ball hits so what you're saying here is don't use VAR and just allow a random arbitrary decision from on-field instead? Because apparently watching a video of a ball hitting the arm isn't "conclusive".