Infinitely Content

That's a myth, nobody ever did. Whereas Michael Jackson, bangers for days, bhaisaab.

I've still got Jacko on my playlist PYT is just too good isn't it. Decent point, but where I’m from as a far bigger part of me than a musician or band. Personally it defines me far more. Still conflicted though. I know what you mean, I guess there's an element of personal value structures tied into that too. For me personally, art is as big a part of my life as just about anything else. But regardless, that was the point I was touching on, that inner conflict that is very complex, and the apparent ability of some to not succumb to any of that and just divorce any attachment. It's interesting to me because when I'm heavily invested into something, the prospect of changing my relationship with that thing is a challenging one and certainly not something that can be done with immediate effect; as if that thing of value pervades multiple areas of your life which is quite likely, that's a lot of untangling to do.

I've still got Jacko on my playlist PYT is just too good isn't it. Notwithstanding the awful taste in music, he wasn’t proved guilty of anything though he likely is a massive nonce. I don’t listen to Lostprophets anymore, even though dragon vs shinobi ninja is a legit banger Had on a sec, you can't say somebody has an awful taste in music for mentioning Michael Jackson then go on to reference Lost Prophets as good

I've still got Jacko on my playlist PYT is just too good isn't it.

I'm curious as to whether those willing and able to divorce themselves from any emotional attachment to the club in lieu of the takeover apply that to other areas of their life too? For instance art, if you love a musician and then discover they've done something or stood for something that doesn't align with your moral values, can you immediately divorce yourself from any attachment to that piece of art? I find it almost impossible to do so, I'm just wondering how with some it's literally 1's and 0's, a kind of robotic-ness with no murky or nuanced middle ground. Genuinely curious as to whether this takeover is an exceptional situation and that even if they wanted to still love the club, they simply couldn't, or are people just cutting emotional ties with immediate effect? (if that's even possible, I'm not so sure)

Aren't Liverpool owned by Americans?

I wouldn't be so sure, big news in today as Christian Atsu is beaten by Trent Alexander-Arnold on Fifa 20. Atsu opted for a front 2 of himself and Saint-Maximin. No faith in Joelinton. Sickening.

Really like Murphy

Diogo Dalot at RB would be good. Ole willing to sell.

Do we have any football friends ? The Mad Mistake, the Sunderland youtuber. He talks us up a fair bit, I rate him.

Like a takeover advent calendar.

Are you honestly comfortably being in a position where you're trying to point out the supposed hypocrisy of Amnesty International? I don't mate I didn't click the article, just talking shite about Mike.

Hope they wrote to them about Mike Ashley's human rights record too.

Rafa >

Aye it's decent like. Assuming neither of them are Newcastle fans? They have good knowledge of our players and the current fans view if not.

"I'm glad you ask, am from wal'send he's from wal'send"

Something moved fast then? Ties in with reports of a meeting tomorrow Shirley not, the Bald Oracle has already dismissed tomorrow's alleged meeting... Shame nobody has invented any way to have virtual meetings.. no

I've no idea who Manu is but I believe him 100%.

Class shout.

I was so fucking proud of this club that day. The result, the support, the players at the end, Rafa.

Rafa. Bielsa, Luis Enrique? But Rafa.

Had on, I've been out the loop choosing to ignore this bout of takeover talk, but this happening?

Agreed.

Eh? Not sure how that’s remotely synonymous, and I didn’t mention Chopra, I said news - meaning articles.