-
Posts
8,364 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Groundhog63
-
Fuck me sideways. Who, out of our squad, would you "rotate" ffs We've 15 players then it's Murphy etc etc
-
County Lines tho ??
-
Newcastle United v West Ham United: 04/02/23 @ 17:30 (Sky Sports)
Groundhog63 replied to HaydnNUFC's topic in Football
Felt like the former on the Wednesday morning. Feel like the latter now. Need to carry on the momentum, go into it high in confidence and high in league status -
Wor Flags: visit worflags.org.uk/donate to support future displays
Groundhog63 replied to wor jackie's topic in Football
"Why should all the physically impaired have all the fun?!!!" -
Wor Flags: visit worflags.org.uk/donate to support future displays
Groundhog63 replied to wor jackie's topic in Football
Need to sack him off and get this bloke in. Can hear him now..... "DON'T STAND UP COS YOU COULD DIE" -
Plus they're back together ???
-
Worst day of my life Then
-
Anyone watched Road Cops? Scratters from all over the country, stealing cars, rampaging around the place, wiping out all sorts then totalling the car their in. Bizzies get a hold of them and young Cayden from Consett is done for driving whilst disqualified, pissed and twoking. Gets another extended ban and a £50 fine. Jail? My arse? He was probs just sat in the driving seat listen to Talkshite till his lass finally rocked up.
-
Aye, I get that. If it was my daughter, without knowing the full sp, I'd be instigating the "know someone" mechanism. He'd not be able to play football again even if someone wanted him. I was just considering her needs. She didn't want it out and was "devastated" it was. Any other parental involvement should be behind closed doors. Her father may well be a cunt. I'm not too fond of Amy Winehouse's old fella or Megan Markle's. Based on tittle, tattle obvs ?
-
Newcastle United v West Ham United: 04/02/23 @ 17:30 (Sky Sports)
Groundhog63 replied to HaydnNUFC's topic in Football
Morning after the semi final I was, genuinely, relaxed about this game and the forthcoming Bournemouth, Liverpool games. Woke up this morning and the usual (last 14 months) pre-match adrenaline has kicked in. Might have a can -
Works the other way to. For eg, Stanley Johnson was/is a bit "handsy" with his wife. Son, Alexander Boris de Pfeffel, has a track record of similar, even with his current. Charles was shagging his married mistress before and all through his marriage. Son William has followed that path. Learnt behaviour ?
-
Not sticking up for her father BUT did he not say in that statement that SHE didn't want it released & was devastated it had been? I'm a dad but, thankfully, not to daughters. I'd be panicking every time she left the house. Either way, when they're adults, you can't pick their partners just a) advise and b) be there for them when it goes Pete Tong Unless you "know someone" of course. Then you get them kneecapped.
-
Hypothetically he could've driven the car from the Hilton underground car park to the front door for his gf to then drive on public highways.....er......
-
Tbf it does rhyme with "Paedo" "Giro" & "I shag me sister and so does me bro"
-
Talking of Shields and music, I see that Shak has been outed as a Gooner ?
-
Got the CD ?????
-
The law's a frustrating process both in its working and, for the "hang em" brigade, quite often with its outcomes. Perhaps deliberately so. I follow a few experts. Azfal being one. Read all, so far, The Secret Barrister books.(*) When you take the emotional/morality aspect away from any case and focus, purely, on the law it's more easily understood. * fully fledged Internet barrister me like. Just for the wig ?
-
Foggy has a hotline to Ten Hag on speed dial, lads. Fair doos.
-
In relation to Greenwood, rather than Castore, isn't it the case that he's innocent. Was going to quotation the "innocent" but, in the eyes of the law he is. Unfortunately. Don't mean to go all Azfal in the search for likes from Neville but he's innocent, now, IN THE EYES OF THE LAW. Likewise, the CPS not progressing the case doesn't mean he's NOT GUILTY of the offence. Just they deem it unlikely they could prove otherwise. The former but would mean, legally, he's entitled to his wedge. Notwithstanding "Disrepute" fault.
-
No it wasn't. The interview was the icing on the cake. He was toast anyway.
-
That's more accurate than Youtube's auto. All over the gaff, that. Like the bit in bold. Means business. Plus he's got a coffee machine and has nee idea how it grafts
-
Go on settings Select Subtitles Select Auto translate Select English Thank me later