Kid Icarus

I know, I was just mocking the whole greggs craic tbh

Aye fair play to Forest, that £25m plus addons for Gibbs-White looks a massive bargain now.

Hahahahaha Greggs hahahahaha

Howe's going to run out of steam again if he doesn't stop trying to do everything

No-one genuinely thinks he's a fucking crytonazi or doing harm do they? Please tell me no one's being serious

Tbf, I think we got on to this because someone posted that she was only where she is for 2 reasons...

Not the same as each other, but it's a bit like comparing the abuse Dianne Abbott gets vs what Zarah Sultana gets imo. The amount varies, but they both get blatany more abuse than you would expect someone white or male to get, and often from exactly the people you'd expect to be giving it. Then when it's highlighted they're 'playing the race card'

If his past posts are anything to go by, TCD was saying those are the main 2 reasons she gets stick above and beyond what you'd otherwise expect. Don't disagree tbh.

No one questions Danny Murphy's position based on his gender and race though do they? It's that he's an ex-player, jobs for the boys etc.

25 appearances is very misreading when he started 12 matches That's why per 90 is a better metric (providing they've still played a decent amount)

Worst use of HH in world history

We're not far away from future generations trying to claim Klose was a better international footballer than Ronaldo because they've checked the stats and can see that he scored more goals at World Cups. That 5th and two mid-table finishes are similar. They hide everything like.

It's 90 minutes and so belongs very firmly in the Twitter bullshit thread, not least because the prat who runs it has a weird dislike for ASM.

This is so weird. I do the web content for the school he's in and did a presentation to them last November about how the high website numbers we get on his profile could be inflated due to mistaken identity with... https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/lorenzo-chiesa/profil/spieler/823330

We should have learned the lesson pretty clearly from VAR that with good intentions come negative consequences or side effects. What I'm reading here is a repeat of the pre-VAR points about how this will obviously sort everything out, but in this case I think the negative consequences are much easier to spot.

You don't think it would just change from pedantry over the first point of an attacker being offside to the last point of them being onside? So instead of arguing over an attacker's toe, we're arguing over their heel? Imo the daft pedantry will still be there like, VAR's still going to check.

As in there has to be a separation between players yeah.

That was never the reality like, it was never literal.

Qatar vs Equador? That was offside though. Wenger's idea in theory might sound easier to see, but I don't think that will at all be the case in practice. The infinitesimal line that we're scrutinising has just moved. The assistant refs decision will still be checked and they'll still delay their decision. They'll just need to defend better is just ignoring the issue really. It's a huge, unfair advantage for the attacker that makes holding a defensive line almost impossible.

Not really, I just want the existing system but with the system that was used at the World Cup, which worked brilliantly. This system that Wenger's proposing won't make the line drawing any easier and makes it nigh on impossible for defenders to hold a defensive line/play attackers offside.

£10 bet that if you asked him to describe communism he'd describe capitalism

Come again?

Why can't they just give us hawkeye ffs Seems like they're doing everything to avoid going for the best, simplest, quickest solution. These alternatives do literally nothing to stop the problem and will likely cause new ones.

Howey and Bez's Tino porn video story changes every time they tell it