nufcnick

“As much” as 85% of turnover is the worry, if clubs in Europe have a lower allowable %, the league is fucked.

Can’t play as he’s on loan

No barnes

That won’t work and no one would ever want to qualify for Europe or challenge for a cup(unless you were given a 3 year grace period), as you would instantly need to cut your bills from 85% to 70%, whilst needing a bigger squad to play in Europe, ie a £300m turnover allows a spend of £255m which overnight would become an allowable spend of £210m, £45m would be a catastrophic cut to any teams spending.

This is why I'm certain we will move stadiums, we generate about £25-30m per season in fan attendances but less than a 1/4 of that is from our 57 corporate Boxes, a new stadium would give us not only at least 3x the corporate boxes but also the extra fan revenue, you could more than double what we make to £70m+

This ^^^ any new rules are always going to be more beneficial to the status quo, it will be interesting to see if they align with UEFA’s punishments for breaching the rules as most are financial based.

UEFA aren’t starting at 70% so I wouldn’t expect the PL to, I’m guessing they will both start at 90% meaning our cap would be £270m this year

Not a chance, currently more likely to be Chelsea, as it fucks them with their stupid contracts and they will be well over 80% wages and transfers to turnover

I don’t think it does TBH

It’s a wages and transfers to turnover, uefa implement it at 90% this year, 80% next year finishing at 70% of turnover, we currently run a about 75% so as long as the PL follow uefa we’re fine and have some room to move

Couldn’t happen to a more deserving bunch of fans

Are you backward, it’s a red all day long

Villa imploding, I dont know how f I’m happy or sad if they fail to qualify for the CL, on one hand it gives the Sly6 a bloody nose, but on the other it puts them in trouble of FFP breaches meaning we could nick a few of their players, and the way spurs play they will run into massive injury problems with the extra games

There is no one that wants rid of the rules implemented by the sly6 more than me, but the first question by any judge would be “why did you sign up to the rules season after season, if you thought they were illegal” there is a reason why they haven’t been challenged already, especially by Manchester City and their lawyers as it’s almost a get out of jail free card.

People keep saying that but never seem to then follow through, as a club why would you willingly sign up to something you think is illegal over and over again

It’s not that it’s a tough nut to crack, it’s that teams knowingly and willingly sign up to abide by the FFP/P&S rules at the start of every season, it’s kind of hard to go to a court and convince a judge that something isn’t fair when you willingly sign up to it every single year

Is it? 9 points isn’t insurmountable

Any chance of sharing, it’s paywalled

Even in the new rules FMV still only applies to related party transactions, it will never apply to non related parties because you would then have the sly6 calling into question each others deals

We don’t have to pass FMV with Adidas because PIF have no ownership of them

He’s always in the mud, he got lucky once or twice, and now he thinks he’s septic peg

You have added adidas to 22/23, adidas doesn’t start til the 24/25 season

In this instance, I think we would be pretty nailed on to get £40m+ for him

If the reports are true they have to sell £100m of homegrown talent by the 31st June, or there massively in the shit, lot of people saying that’s why spurs pulled the plug on Conor Gallagher for £60m in January as they think they will get him for under £40m in June. They don’t have much left to sell after him though to balance the books until 25/26

20/21 £37.3m loss 21/22 £0.4m profit 22/23 £119.6m loss Total £156.5m loss £51.5m over the £105m threshold. dont think that will account for allowed deductibles though