Jump to content

et tu brute

Member
  • Posts

    6,057
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by et tu brute

  1. Funny as fuck seeing them going post to post from total faux outrage, to their total delight highlighting our signings are not becoming of an expected top club (even though the window hasn't officially opened). Which is the most important I wonder? . I'm putting money on the faux outrage being the outright winner come the end of the transfer window
  2. Couldn't give a fuck what you think to be honest
  3. Santon was better going forward. And, as mentioned Williams and Enrique also. Targett didn't really show anything to me in an attacking sense, though solid defensively.
  4. Shame was going to buy all the kits, but not a chance in hell with that monstrosity on the front of it. Might look at the knocked off ones without any logis, but if not then maybe next year
  5. I still say we should take them to the anti-competition courts and it's blatantly restrain of trade and anti-competitive.
  6. I don't blame the player (currently), just think we need to move straight on to the next.
  7. Well looks like the bookmark is not worth keeping then. For what it's worth I just don't agree with you in terms of your valuation to what we could have got this year with a new spinsor, but we will leave it there as we won't even find out now.
  8. Any player who is showing any sign of being reluctant to join, should be binned from the list immediately and then move onto the next on the list
  9. Proves nothing in relation to that, it's obvious the contract can't be broken. You said they would get no more than 10 million, we will have to wait and see on that when a new sponsor is announced. As I said it's already bookmarked for when they do actually get a new sponsor
  10. If a Middle East state was going to go directly against PIF to get at the Saudi state (they won't), they would choose one of the top 6 clubs. The faux (I thought they would all walk away if Middle East owners owned their club) mackems are broken and this is just the start. The news today was amusing and also illustrated that their little French owner is a bulkshit merchant. They just don't get the fact that he doesn't want to risk owning the club in it's entirety; and only has a 41% ownership stake, is a massive red flag. It's great that Bill and Ben are willing to sell to anyone (they make their money so won't give a fuck) just to piss their fans off at best and at worst leave that club in serious trouble in the future. Long may it continue.
  11. It's not the same shade of blue as the Fun88 badge (using colour picker tool), Just have to find out tomorrow.
  12. If he is seen to be that good a prospect, then I would say yes. I don't know what he's like as I said.
  13. Which then begs the question, if he's that good, why haven't they already signed him? Don't know anything really about the player, as I don't really watch other leagues.
  14. I honestly take no notice of journalists nowadays (some more than others) with their constant speculation and poo-pooing each other for nothing more than clickbait headlines. I'm confident that the owners will get the necessary recruitments in this summer; and most importantly recruitments with the required level of quality to move us forward.
  15. Wouldn't take any notice of that fucker on anything. Is he still stating that only 50 million is available (he said the same in January). One thing is for absolute certain, is that bald cunt will be getting nothing from the owners.
  16. We don't know what the budget is or what their intentions are. All I'm saying it's a massive risk having a person as the main striker who has missed half the games due to injury. Time will tell what happens.
  17. I'm not sure the owners (or me) agree with that mind. Wilson has only played half the games available in his time here. You just can't rely on that he won't get a major injury, and then run the risk of having to play the young lad as the main striker instead of easing him in. I saw the same thing happen to Tomasson. Wood is just not up to scratch either.
  18. I just posted that from some legal site https://www.thelegalside.co.uk/amp/co-ownership-issues-in-european-football-red-bull
  19. Need another striker in if that's the case as you just can't rely on Wilson with his injury record and Wood is just plain shit
  20. Don't think they are still actual owners, but found a way round it to pacify UEFA However, prior to the competitions commencement, Red Bull relinquished their ownership of Salzburg and became sponsors, however the club crest, stadium and all things associated to Red Bull still pretty much remained the same, whilst RB Leipzig remained owned by Red Bull (per Sky).28 Apr 2021
×
×
  • Create New...