Fantail Breeze

Glad we’ve reverted back to our normal game plan: Defend -> give the ball to ASM and hope for something special -> defend

No atmosphere, the away team controlling the game, a lack of discontent with the Ashley ownership, Alex Hurst having the time of his life. It’s like Covid never happened. Just need them to boo ASM off the pitch because he’s not defended enough.

Oh I’d take the FA Cup in a heartbeat for us. I was probably talking about/looking at it from Leicester’s ‘plan’ point of view. What would help them continue to progress more?

Answered before I even posted

Win the FA Cup or qualify for the CL? What would people prefer? For us, I’d say the FA Cup. But Leicester recently tasted success with the PL win. Would the CL allow them to grow that little bit more? More money, attract better players/keep the ones they have?

Useless twat could’ve at least thrown a punch at the end there.

What’s this goal going to be disallowed for then?...

Surely those involved in Italian football, being the beacons of integrity, would never do such a thing.

Lampard has always rubbed people up the wrong way imo. Comes across as a smarmy know-it-all. That said, I have no feelings about wanting him to suceed or not.

Yup. The club never declared MBS as a director, so that’s not applicable.

On first name terms with Chris though...

Could’ve fucking booked him though. 7/1 ffs.

If you’re right - why do the PL believe they are in a position to defend? They’d have folded by now, if it was that straightforward.

I thought I heard the same before the FA Cup final too. Obviously was the case.

Really like Pulisic, don’t understand why he’s not consistently starting at Chelsea. The ball just sticks to his feet when he’s dribbling at players.

Their evidence submission, not the actual hearing, right? Unless I’ve interpreted that wrong. They can delay their evidence submission all they like as long as the hearing goes ahead in July.

Two posts in this thread = “absolutely fizzing”. I’ve shared my opinion and then responded to posts quoting me. That’s usually how a discussion/forum works. I’ve also posted in various other threads tonight about other subjects... Let’s just ignore that though.

I went with Werner at 7/1 as he’s such a petulant little fucker. He’s had two cards in his last six (including against Leicester the other day).

They’re not trying to delay arbitration, where is that from? They’re trying to get the CAT case thrown out before it’s even been heard though.

I don’t disagree they’re bent as fuck. But they’re also bent and snide enough to know what to do to cover their tracks and make them look like the innocent party.

Looks like you’ll only need to wait until July to hear them argue their case. It’s so ‘clear as day’ that the PL are willing to fight it in court. Rightio.

What’s the timescales for that? Is there one? If not, have they failed do that yet? Or are they still open for the takeover and objectively applying their rules to give the consortium every opportunity to comply...? I’m not claiming to be an expert, but the PL’s lawyers wouldn’t be defending it if it was as simple as you’re suggesting.

But then they’re open to a court case for rejecting it... so either way they cannot avoid it. They can win this case though and have all of their costs covered. Maybe they thought it’d be easier to win this one, than defend a rejection.

Where does the rule book say they have to reject it? They look incredibly uncertain of their decision. So much so they’re willing to fight it all the way (which we’ve been repeatedly told by you, they wouldn’t).