The College Dropout Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 Except he's 6'0 and can impose himself physically on a match. Also good in the air. Gets stuck in properly too. He wouldn't need Colback to hold his hand (apparently). Also 6 years younger than Anita. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ElCid Posted September 1, 2015 Share Posted September 1, 2015 I would assume McClaren could clearly see that CM wasn't a pressing need, so pressured for transfers in other areas. It's not about playing 30-40 yard passes and it's not about being physically dominant. How many times does Tiote get turned by agile opponents. I want my CM's to keep the ball and control the tempo of the game above all else. That means short, sharp passes, to move the opposition around the pitch. Anita and Colback are the best we have at doing that. Wijnaldum might be better but we don't know yet. I'll point out again that Spurs finished 5th with Benteleb and Mason playing CM. They are not fundamentally better than Anita-Colback. I'm not saying you have to agree with playing them both, but if you fail to grasp the rationale behind doing so, then I don't hold out much hope. Tiote has given 10 times more good performances for this club than either Anita and Colaback and against the so called better teams also. I won't even go on about agile opponents cos if you think Anita and Colaback are better at stopping these players then you're just talking utter s***. Anita and Colback short sharp passes are you for real - I must have missed the bids coming from Barcelona. Mason and Benteleb are not the best I agree but still a lot better than Anita and Colback (Benteleb actually played in the 4- 0 and 3 - 1 victories last season so your point again is mute). Please name me one game when these two have dominated midfield even one game please do and don't say West Ham last year as they were not even giving 100% that game If you fail to grasp the rationale that by continuing to play Colback and Anita in midfield to the detriment of the team then your clueless - what makes it even funnier is that you contradict yourself be saying you wouldn't play both either and yet still argue the point - LAUGHABLE!! Let's see in another six matches if these two play what the results are and the league position the team is in as we won't be out of the bottom 3 if they are playing every game. Do you read? Colback and Anita are the best that WE have. Would it be nice to go out and buy Busquets and Modric? Yes, absolutely but it isn't going to happen. I'm speaking about the CURRENT squad we have here. Otherwise we all might as well just pick our world XI's and blame McClaren for not banging on the door hard enough. My point is not redundant just because someone played in a team that beat Alan Pardew and John Carver. Anita and Colback are comparable players to Mason and Benteleb and Tottenham were able to finish 5th. As Triggs points out, this was largely because of Harry Kane (and others), but we have players of that quality in Sissoko, De Jong, Thauvin, Mitrovic, Wijnaldum, etc. The fact is, you can do well as a team with average players starting at CM as long as they know their jobs. What I said was, I wouldn't play just one of Colback-Anita, as neither is good enough defensively to play as a single anchor. You do with a midfield of average players starting in midfield as long as they know they job what a total pile of shit and these two are the best out of our current squad total bollocks are they. The Tottenham players are better end of and nothing you will say will change that. If you play average players you get beat ffs man you really are on a different planet, they are being totally dominated in every game. Let's see after 10 games who is right and wrong because if these two are playing in those games we will be in the bottom 3 and you can bookmark that also. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AY Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Colback and Anita played against Spurs last season when we won there btw.. I think Anita has played well in the new system, drops deep between centre halves in the build up and allows the fullbacks to push up. The worrying thing is Colback cannot receive a ball and play it forward. Bentaleb is not really rated among Spurs fans that I know either. Still don't think both should play. Both like to choose the easy pass too often. But we have decent players in midfield, need fullbacks and a striker to replace Cisse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Colback and Anita played against Spurs last season when we won there btw.. I think Anita has played well in the new system, drops deep between centre halves in the build up and allows the fullbacks to push up. The worrying thing is Colback cannot receive a ball and play it forward. Bentaleb is not really rated among Spurs fans that I know either. Still don't think both should play. Both like to choose the easy pass too often. But we have decent players in midfield, need fullbacks and a striker to replace Cisse. This is the real issue with the system and players we have, Anita could do what Colback is doing just as well but the reverse isn't true. Such a shame this is what we're stuck with in CM like. The answer has to be to drop the ginger knacker and bring Perez in as an ACM to start getting at the other team a bit. Relieve the pressure that way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AY Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 I think Wijnaldum will drop a bit deeper very soon. Either De Jong or Perez as a no 10 in that case. Perez hopefully. The formation may change to 4-3-3 soon anyway, or 4-1-4-1 like againt ManU. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Billy Whitehurst was his best man back in their Hull days together according to the Chronicle today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzza Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Agree completely, wijnaldum needs to drop into the two middle player section and one of anita or colback get dropped. bring ayoze or SDJ into the No10 spot. Probloem solved, we all see it clearly apart from Mclaren who thinks Wiji's position os No10 (Wiji has said his preferred place). He is playing very well in that position also, bit of a conundrum really, would be good to try it out though... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Didn't know Billy Whitehurst was his best man. Saw him play and he was a hard nut. Was there when he gave two fingers to the crowd in his last game - not many around like him these days. I was there too, and proud to say I was in that section of the crowd he gave the two fingered salute to. He deserved all the abuse he got, absolute donkey of a player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Bentaleb is a decent unit, decent in the air and gets across the pitch with ease. Mason too, can cover ground very well. I think that's a big problem with these two, they look fine when we are sitting deep and defending, but it means we are limited when it comes to pushing teams onto the back foot, I just don't think they have either the physicality or the legs to go box to box. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 I do not understand why we would sign Wijnaldum to play as #10. At the beginning of the season we had Perez, De Jong & Cabella that could play there. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DebuchyAndTheBeast Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 I would assume McClaren could clearly see that CM wasn't a pressing need, so pressured for transfers in other areas. It's not about playing 30-40 yard passes and it's not about being physically dominant. How many times does Tiote get turned by agile opponents. I want my CM's to keep the ball and control the tempo of the game above all else. That means short, sharp passes, to move the opposition around the pitch. Anita and Colback are the best we have at doing that. Wijnaldum might be better but we don't know yet. I'll point out again that Spurs finished 5th with Benteleb and Mason playing CM. They are not fundamentally better than Anita-Colback. I'm not saying you have to agree with playing them both, but if you fail to grasp the rationale behind doing so, then I don't hold out much hope. Spurs have a lot of physical midfielders and I remember them making us look like boys at SJP two seasons ago when we had Sissoko and Anita as CMs. The lack of physical presence in our midfield was apparent on Saturday when both of our CMs were always yards away from the Arsenal player with the ball . That's because even if they did press they would always struggle to put in a tackle against a big guy without fouling Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 I do not understand why we would sign Wijnaldum to play as #10. At the beginning of the season we had Perez, De Jong & Cabella that could play there. Who said we signed him to play number 10? Our number 10 will be De Jong. Wijnaldum is just filling in because De Jong is working his way back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Away Toon Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Well Wijnaldum said he was signed to play number 10 and that's certainly where he wants to play. He was specifically quoted as saying he didn't want to play as a winger or in centre midfield. Thauvin actually said the same thing. De Jong can pretty much only play as a 10. I'm sure that Perez wants to play as a 10. Pretty crowded that number 10 spot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Well he's played 10 thus far. Could do with him at CM. Really doubt that's the plan though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Away Toon Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 The plan certainly shouldn't be Anita and Colback. Well soon find out if McClaren has any balls or he's just another negative safety first boring idiot like Pardew. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Didn't know Billy Whitehurst was his best man. Saw him play and he was a hard nut. Was there when he gave two fingers to the crowd in his last game - not many around like him these days. I was there too, and proud to say I was in that section of the crowd he gave the two fingered salute to. He deserved all the abuse he got, absolute donkey of a player. Had some poor forwards then - Mavis Reilly and Tony Cunningham to name but two. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Yep, you could see why Beardsley pissed off when he was surrounded by these cart horses Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Of all our "hard" players over the years I can't think of anyone close to Bad Billy. Anyone disagree? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 2, 2015 Share Posted September 2, 2015 Of all our "hard" players over the years I can't think of anyone close to Bad Billy. Anyone disagree? Heard some stories about McNamee and Ollie Burton and I actually think Kevin Scott was up for it, always first on the scene and protective of his team mates when things got ugly, his problem was he was so polite in play. No one bullied Shearer and apparently if Benny Kristensen could be roused he was mean, Kevin Dillon had a reputataion that it seemed he was trying to live down when he came here, Joey Barton was/is a pussy in comparisson. On the pitch Billy wasn't that hard but he had a reputation, put him in the car park with a Shearer could be interesting, as much because Shearer could take it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
merlin Posted September 3, 2015 Share Posted September 3, 2015 Of all our "hard" players over the years I can't think of anyone close to Bad Billy. Anyone disagree? Heard some stories about McNamee and Ollie Burton and I actually think Kevin Scott was up for it, always first on the scene and protective of his team mates when things got ugly, his problem was he was so polite in play. No one bullied Shearer and apparently if Benny Kristensen could be roused he was mean, Kevin Dillon had a reputataion that it seemed he was trying to live down when he came here, Joey Barton was/is a pussy in comparisson. On the pitch Billy wasn't that hard but he had a reputation, put him in the car park with a Shearer could be interesting, as much because Shearer could take it. Both McNamee and Burton were hard cases - McNamee more obviously, I once saw him get booked for a clattering foul on Alan Clarke of Leeds and McNamee had only been on the field as a sub for a couple of minutes. He was a decent CB though and intimidating for opposition forwards - he often weighed in with crucial goals too, saw him score against Spurs after just about battering his way into their penalty area after working a 1-2 with Pop Robson(I think) and there was that never-to-be forgotten moment when he swung from the Sunderland cross-bar at Roker Park after scoring there...I think it was a 3-3 draw after we had been behind. Burton was a more cultured defender and he had decent ball skills but he could be very nasty on the quiet....always thought him and Moncur were our best defensive pairing during the Fairs Cup run. Some real hard cases around at that time...Chopper Harris of Chelsea, Peter Storey at Arsenal and of course, Tommy Smith(Liverpool)and Norman Hunter/Jackie Charlton at Leeds. Some of these guys wouldn't last 5 minutes with today's rules/refs.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted September 3, 2015 Share Posted September 3, 2015 Billy Whitehurst was just as hard on the pitch, he was a beast and terrified people. You read back on old players that mention the hardest player they have played against and it was always Billy's name that came up. It was him that also destroyed Bracewells leg when he was at Everton. He was out for about 2 years. I do remember a game against Birmingham when the left back was kicking lumps out of Paul Stephenson (only a young kid at the time) and after yet another foul, Whitehurst went over and started talking to Stephenson and pointing at the left back. You could literally see the left backs arse falling off, especialy when Whitehurst worked his way over that side of the pitch. Was glorious to see as a young kid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stottie Posted September 3, 2015 Share Posted September 3, 2015 I started watching football in the 1970s and it was completely different then. Among Leeds players, Gordon McQueen wasn't a standout hardman, but stick this into Youtube for a look at what a bad-tempered game was like back then. In a high-profile game I think you could be looking at a 10-game ban for that now. "Barca vs Leeds 1975 MCQueen sending off" He actually contests the decision! Even nice guys like Keegan had to be up for it, as witnessed by him trading blows with Billy Bremner in the Charity Shield (!) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted September 3, 2015 Share Posted September 3, 2015 I started watching football in the 1970s and it was completely different then. Among Leeds players, Gordon McQueen wasn't a standout hardman, but stick this into Youtube for a look at what a bad-tempered game was like back then. In a high-profile game I think you could be looking at a 10-game ban for that now. "Barca vs Leeds 1975 MCQueen sending off" He actually contests the decision! Even nice guys like Keegan had to be up for it, as witnessed by him trading blows with Billy Bremner in the Charity Shield (!) Gordon McQueen's daughter scrubs up well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallsendmag Posted September 3, 2015 Share Posted September 3, 2015 Of all our "hard" players over the years I can't think of anyone close to Bad Billy. Anyone disagree? Kilcline would be up there but Billy Whitehurst used to beat up gypsies in his spare time so I reckon he would take it like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted September 9, 2015 Share Posted September 9, 2015 Sounds good to me: http://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/steve-mcclaren-plots-attacking-re-10015882 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now