Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, TheBrownBottle said:

It’s a wee bit different.  BR took over one of the world’s richest clubs, we also were by absolutely no means certain to go down.  It’s hard to make that claim given he came in in September.  We also qualified for Europe in 11 of 14 seasons before Ashley rocked up - it wasn’t exactly unusual. 

 

Agreed but I think the fit was perfect and no other manager wpuld of turned it around. It reminded me of fergie leaving Man Utd, no one has had same success but SBR came in after 2 big appointments and did a great job.

 

But that season it felt like there was a shift and a devide in dressing room and board level that could of left us in big trouble.

 

I think KK and SBR both go down as club legends and rightly so.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, andycap said:

The alan pardew stand should be a priority. ? 


Just because he finished 5th doesn’t mean he deserves a statue. You seem to be conveniently forgetting that he also finished 5th bottom the following season. His inability to control players with any ego (ie. Ben Arfa) sucked out whatever enjoyment there was left when watching his style of ‘football’. I appreciate everyone is entitled to their own opinion but I think you’re way off thinking Pardew deserves a statue mate. :thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MrRaspberryJam said:


Just because he finished 5th doesn’t mean he deserves a statue. You seem to be conveniently forgetting that he also finished 5th bottom the following season. His inability to control players with any ego (ie. Ben Arfa) sucked out whatever enjoyment there was left when watching his style of ‘football’. I appreciate everyone is entitled to their own opinion but I think you’re way off thinking Pardew deserves a statue mate. :thup:

You on the wind up lad ? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

When you look at Newcastle's whole history its evident we undervalue certain managers/players just because of how long ago Newcastle were actually winning things. 

 

Colin veitch is probably head and shoulders above others when you look at what he actually achieved as a player for us yet how many people actually know who he was? 

 

I think save stands and statues for those who actually reached the pinnacle. KK is a legend but I think he might be a bit embarrassed by his own standards (remember he didn't want to do a lap of honour for finishing second) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pancrate1892 said:

When you look at Newcastle's whole history its evident we undervalue certain managers/players just because of how long ago Newcastle were actually winning things. 

 

Colin veitch is probably head and shoulders above others when you look at what he actually achieved as a player for us yet how many people actually know who he was? 

 

I think save stands and statues for those who actually reached the pinnacle. KK is a legend but I think he might be a bit embarrassed by his own standards (remember he didn't want to do a lap of honour for finishing second) 

I know where you’re coming from - but this club doesn’t exist in its modern form without KK.  He was more than a manager & former player.  I’ve said it before, but this is the club that Kevin built.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

I know where you’re coming from - but this club doesn’t exist in its modern form without KK.  He was more than a manager & former player.  I’ve said it before, but this is the club that Kevin built.  

Totally agree mate, easily persuaded! Probs more hinted toward SBR era

 

The club wouldn't be what it is now without Keegan, absolutely agree

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

It’s a wee bit different.  BR took over one of the world’s richest clubs, we also were by absolutely no means certain to go down.  It’s hard to make that claim given he came in in September.  We also qualified for Europe in 11 of 14 seasons before Ashley rocked up - it wasn’t exactly unusual. 


we did get in through the back door or on a technicality a few times mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, NUFC91 said:

 

Aye and any fan who had a go at it SBR were idiots and his comments were absolutely spot on. We had'nt won anything in years and he came in to a club certain to be relagated and had European football all within such a short space of time. The dressing room comment always me laugh as those who thought they were above him probably peaked career wise under him and we got significantly worse after he left.

 

What Howe has done for us is unbelievable but Sir Bobby did the same hence why he deserves his statue. However I agree Keegan deserves one.

 

SBR came in during September with 32 games left to play and a more than capable squad at his disposal.

 

It's ridiculous to suggest we were certain to be relegated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Wallsendmag said:

 

SBR came in during September with 32 games left to play and a more than capable squad at his disposal.

 

It's ridiculous to suggest we were certain to be relegated.

Yep.  Given, Solano, Ferguson, Dyer, Speed, Shearer, Lee etc

 

Gullit was sacked in August - there was plenty of time left :) 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, TheBrownBottle said:

Balls to a statue - I still say rename the East Stand.  Or have both. 

No thanks. Don't mind a Keegan suite or whatever but we have our stand names. Leazes, Gallowgate, East stand and Milburn

Link to post
Share on other sites

Leazes was called the Sir John Hall Stand when it was rebuilt in 1993 and the Gallowgate End was called the Exhibition Stand when it was rebuild in 1994 before both being renamed back to their original names in years to come.

 

Wouldn't object to the East Stand being renamed after Keegan. He deserves it imo. As has been mentioned he, above all, shaped the club into what it is today.

 

All of us who were watching pre 1992 with 13/14,000 others will vouch for that. He literally changed everything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, madras said:

No thanks. Don't mind a Keegan suite or whatever but we have our stand names. Leazes, Gallowgate, East stand and Milburn

The old west being called the Milburn is more recent than my birth.  A rebuilt East stand in particular would need a new name.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Wallsendmag said:

Leazes was called the Sir John Hall Stand when it was rebuilt in 1993 and the Gallowgate End was called the Exhibition Stand when it was rebuild in 1994 before both being renamed back to their original names in years to come.

 

Wouldn't object to the East Stand being renamed after Keegan. He deserves it imo. As has been mentioned he, above all, shaped the club into what it is today.

 

All of us who were watching pre 1992 with 13/14,000 others will vouch for that. He literally changed everything.

Did anyone call them that ? I'm one of those that was there then (it was more than that btw, we were down to that in the David Barton days) and I'm not in favour of rena.ing stuff that already has a name.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, madras said:

Did anyone call them that ? I'm one of those that was there then (it was more than that btw, we were down to that in the David Barton days) and I'm not in favour of rena.ing stuff that already has a name.

 

We had loads of sub 15k crowds in the 90/91 season. I was stood in all them. Crowds picked up in 91/92 but still remember a game v Cambridge where the crowd was 13k and 14k v Southend. They didn't even bother opening the Leazes End v Southend!

 

Edited: Just checked and we had 8 sub 15k crowds in the 90/91 season.

 

 

Edited by Wallsendmag

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Wallsendmag said:

 

We had loads of sub 15k crowds in the 90/91 season. I was stood in all them. Crowds picked up in 91/92 but still remember a game v Cambridge where the crowd was 13k and 14k v Southend. They didn't even bother opening the Leazes End v Southend!

There were some, not as many as the early 80s. Rarely seemed that low when in the ground.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, madras said:

There were some, not as many as the early 80s. Rarely seemed that low when in the ground.

 

I'd have to disagree. Looked completely dead in that 90/91 season and for parts of the 91/92 season. I'm too young to remember the really early 80s, I started going in 83/84.

 

https://youtu.be/XzP_aZu2w74?si=1iSsBUto5fJ5lJli

 

 

Edited by Wallsendmag

Link to post
Share on other sites

No single person did more for this club in my lifetime than Keegan… but it wasn’t just the club, it was like he grabbed the whole city by the scruff of the neck and lifted it… and not once but twice… the sheer joy, hope and excitement he brought with him was unbelievable…

In his time as a player st. James was bouncing and away games were class… Man City home and away… Liverpool 0-4, all the promotion games… fuckin loved every minute of it as a young lad…

And when he came back as manager he did exactly the same thing…

So whether it’s a statue, stand I’m not bothered as long as we do something .. love the bloke me… love him..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...