ChrisJbarnes Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 just seen this on the fulham website: "The ratings are based on the following criteria; verbal support in acceptable form and covert recognition of outstanding play by opponents. Points are deducted for persistent foul abusive language, persistent abuse of Officials' decisions and aggressive threatening conduct towards opposing fans." another reson to hate chelsea, as if there werent enough. 1 Fulham 32 266 8.31 2 Portsmouth 32 265 8.28 3 Newcastle United 32 264 8.25 4 Wigan Athletic 32 263 8.22 5 Arsenal 32 262 8.19 6 Manchester United 32 261 8.16 7 Manchester City 32 259 8.09 8 Blackburn Rovers 32 258 8.06 9 Derby County 32 257 8.03 10 Tottenham Hotspur 32 257 8.03 11 Sunderland 32 256 8.00 12 Everton 32 254 7.94 13 Liverpool 32 253 7.91 14 Birmingham City 32 253 7.91 15 West Ham United 32 253 7.91 16 Middlesbrough 32 252 7.88 17 Reading 32 247 7.72 18 Bolton Wanderers 32 244 7.63 19 Aston Villa 32 239 7.47 20 Chelsea 32 238 7.44 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1878 Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 I thought we'd be lower than that. Especially on ref's decisions- STILL haven't had a pen this season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
healthyaddiction Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 chelsea are fulhams 'local rivals' so as it's from a fulham forum you have to accept there is a decent amount of bias just as the fact that fulham are top. Unless this was done independantly but i'd find that surprising given the relative positions i just explained. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 Just as well "Abusive language to own teams manager" wasnt par tof the criteria or else we woudl have been totally knackered Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearer9 Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 Surely the lack of "persistent foul abusive language, persistent abuse of Officials' decisions and aggressive threatening conduct towards opposing fans" is because there's nobody at Fulham games? Which should in turn mean bad things for the "verbal support in acceptable form and covert recognition of outstanding play by opponents" section... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 (Another) load of fucking shite 'league table'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 chelsea are fulhams 'local rivals' so as it's from a fulham forum you have to accept there is a decent amount of bias just as the fact that fulham are top. Unless this was done independantly but i'd find that surprising given the relative positions i just explained. It hadnt even registered thet Fulham were top and were therefore the best fans Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisJbarnes Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 chelsea are fulhams 'local rivals' so as it's from a fulham forum you have to accept there is a decent amount of bias just as the fact that fulham are top. Unless this was done independantly but i'd find that surprising given the relative positions i just explained. "The tables are compiled from marks awarded by The Premier League Match Delegates. " also its on the home page not the forum, so id expect it to make a little sense. not that you can really work out who the nicest fans are by awarding points. still looks like what most would expect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 I thought we'd be lower than that. Especially on ref's decisions- STILL haven't had a pen this season. why dont you send some videos bitching to the FA like you did last year? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1878 Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 I thought we'd be lower than that. Especially on ref's decisions- STILL haven't had a pen this season. why dont you send some videos bitching to the FA like you did last year? Cause it didn't work, obviously. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 (Another) load of f****** s**** 'league table'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRC Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 If it wasn't for Alan Smith we would be top by a longway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted April 8, 2008 Share Posted April 8, 2008 I thought we'd be lower than that. Especially on ref's decisions- STILL haven't had a pen this season. Should start playing AJ a bit more then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pinkeye Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 Based on some of the dead atmospheres we have had and the abuse screamed at Fat Sam early on in the season I am very surprised that we are not on negative points in that league. Also based on whos opinion are the points awarded and deducted, I cannot say that I have ever heard of this measuring stick before.......... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UV Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 If it wasn't for Alan Smith we would be top by a longway Does he just sit in the crowd swearing at the ref these days like? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted April 9, 2008 Share Posted April 9, 2008 I thought we'd be lower than that. Especially on ref's decisions- STILL haven't had a pen this season. Should start playing AJ a bit more then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now