Guest BooBoo Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 Much rather KK was back than Kinnear, thats for sure Na. Neither are right for the club and Kinnear is easier to get rid of. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? Ask KK himself, he always said it was his third spell at the club, but dont worry, i know how you younguns dont like to count anything that happened before the prem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 Ask KK himself, he always said it was his third spell at the club, but dont worry, i know how you younguns dont like to count anything that happened before the prem. What?... has nothing to do with anything that's been said. Just arguing for the sake of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 Ask KK himself, he always said it was his third spell at the club, but dont worry, i know how you younguns dont like to count anything that happened before the prem. ... has nothing to do with anything that's been said. Just arguing for the sake of it. just correcting people, who making statements for the sake of it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? Ask KK himself, he always said it was his third spell at the club, but dont worry, i know how you younguns dont like to count anything that happened before the prem. Be quiet. And leave. There's a good boy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 I'm like a batterred wife on this one to be honest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? Ask KK himself, he always said it was his third spell at the club, but dont worry, i know how you younguns dont like to count anything that happened before the prem. Be quiet. And leave. There's a good boy. you dont know what your talking about, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? Ask KK himself, he always said it was his third spell at the club, but dont worry, i know how you younguns dont like to count anything that happened before the prem. Be quiet. And leave. There's a good boy. you dont know what your talking about, Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
M4 Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? Ask KK himself, he always said it was his third spell at the club, but dont worry, i know how you younguns dont like to count anything that happened before the prem. Be quiet. And leave. There's a good boy. you dont know what your talking about, clown Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? You never come back for a second spell. It was a daft decision by Cashley and it backfired predictably. Thrice would be a joke too far. i take it you dismiss his first time here as a player? What on earth has that got to do with his managerial career? Ask KK himself, he always said it was his third spell at the club, but dont worry, i know how you younguns dont like to count anything that happened before the prem. Be quiet. And leave. There's a good boy. you dont know what your talking about, clown lol Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JamesyJazz Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 No way would i want KK back. Love the guy for what he did first time round but i think he is too old fashioned to get us back to were we were yeah, its far better hanging around the bottom three than the top three. You reckon Keegan would have us "hanging around" the top 3 if he was still here?!! Behave man. No way would i want KK back. Love the guy for what he did first time round but i think he is too old fashioned to get us back to were we were yeah, its far better hanging around the bottom three than the top three. You reckon Keegan would have us "hanging around" the top 3 if he was still here?!! Behave man. No way would i want KK back. Love the guy for what he did first time round but i think he is too old fashioned to get us back to were we were yeah, its far better hanging around the bottom three than the top three. You reckon Keegan would have us "hanging around" the top 3 if he was still here?!! Behave man. id give you a good bet he'd be nearer the top three than the bottom three, if he was allowed to choose his own players, ... I reckon if Keegan had still been here we would be way up above where we are now.The mere fact that KK just bu**ered off,left the players on a major downer,that took a good while for them to get over and just left everyone else to get on with it.That,along with Ashleys total mishandling of the situation,then yeah we would have had a more stable and happy team n fans. KK has had his time,we have to move on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Could we reset the poll on this one after the tribunal findings? For the record yes 100% Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmonkey Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 In a flash. Premiership mid table at the end of next season with him in charge of his own squad. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 YES Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slugsy Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alan Shearer 9 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 SIGN HIM SIGN HIM NOW VINDICATED HE TURNED DOWN £28 MILION FOR THE FANS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 SIGN HIM SIGN HIM NOW VINDICATED HE TURNED DOWN £28 MILION FOR THE FANS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Alan Shearer 9 Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 SIGN HIM SIGN HIM NOW VINDICATED HE TURNED DOWN £28 MILION FOR THE FANS Would you rather keep Hughton and be relegated again after the last performance? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 No. Fuck off you money grabbing cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 Hmmm, I don't know. It would definitely bring a big smile to my face but think maybe we need to move on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnnypd Posted October 2, 2009 Share Posted October 2, 2009 wouldn't say no, considering our position, but i'd want us to look at other managers too. if, at the end of the interview process, he proves to be the best candidate and wants the job then i would have no qualms in giving it to him, but i wouldn't just offer it simply because he is KK. looking at it pragmatically he has proven ability in bringing sides up and stabilising them in the new division, which is what we need atm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now