Dave Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Is it just me who doesn't like the look if the Nigerian bid? Apparently their latest offer is £200m which Ashley won't accept. They say they won't go higher because that will leave them with no funds for transfers, development etc. Waste of time if that's true. If that's right then it was obviously just a PR operation for NVA, because Ashley would never sell for that. Stress on the 'if' though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Is it just me who doesn't like the look if the Nigerian bid? I'm not convinced of any bid that needs to scrabble together enough funds to buy the club. Sounds like the Icelandic West Ham debacle. imagine how big their sofa is They're going to pay Martins in Naira (he sends most of it home to his family anyway) and re-invest the savings in re-branding the club Newgeria United. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MrSundlofer Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Wouldn't mind that Indian dude. "Do it like City" in a Arsenal way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 I don't particularly like the sound of consortiums that have been put together just to buy the club. It suggests that there won't be much in the way of funds to invest in the club, over and above what has been generated through income. I also worry whether divisions might appear between the various backers, at some stage. (Look at what's happened to Liverpool) I'd be happier with a leader who could impose a direction and, if necessary, take calculated risks. It seems to me that with these consortiums we'd be operating on a more strictly business model, and I've yet to see anything to get enthusiastic about. As Sir John Hall said, the corporate model doesn't really work for football. These people also seem to be dangling the carrot to the fans of bringing Keegan back, but Keegan likes to have access to the man with the purse strings, and to persuade him to cough up funds. As we've seen, he doesn't like working within a corporate structure. That's if you think it's right to bring Keegan back anyway, which I don't. Unless we're looking at some Abramovich-style sugardaddy, I can't see that they're going to offer us anything more than Ashley, and in fact, arguably less. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 I don't particularly like the sound of consortiums that have been put together just to buy the club. It suggests that there won't be much in the way of funds to invest in the club, over and above what has been generated through income. I also worry whether divisions might appear between the various backers, at some stage. (Look at what's happened to Liverpool) I'd be happier with a leader who could impose a direction and, if necessary, take calculated risks. It seems to me that with these consortiums we'd be operating on a more strictly business model, and I've yet to see anything to get enthusiastic about. As Sir John Hall said, the corporate model doesn't really work for football. These people also seem to be dangling the carrot to the fans of bringing Keegan back, but Keegan likes to have access to the man with the purse strings, and to persuade him to cough up funds. As we've seen, he doesn't like working within a corporate structure. That's if you think it's right to bring Keegan back anyway, which I don't. Unless we're looking at some Abramovich-style sugardaddy, I can't see that they're going to offer us anything more than Ashley, and in fact, arguably less. Absolutely spot on. If the "cockney mafia" was clueless about the "area" and the Geordie nation, then what on earth will a consortium from Nigeria know about it? Bringing back Keegan (under a consortium regime) will be a massive massive mistake that could spell the end for the club in the not so far future. Having said that, I will say it again, IMO Keegan is finished with football, and in particular, NUFC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Unless we're looking at some Abramovich-style sugardaddy, I can't see that they're going to offer us anything more than Ashley, and in fact, arguably less. What about the SAFC model with a front man backed by a group with enough money between them? Seems to be working. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slugsy Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Just to echo the reservations about consortium bids, particularly ones which are already talking about finite resources and still trying to rake money together. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Is it just me who doesn't like the look if the Nigerian bid? Apparently their latest offer is £200m which Ashley won't accept. They say they won't go higher because that will leave them with no funds for transfers, development etc. Waste of time if that's true. I can't fault them for trying to lowball someone who wants out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJS Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Absolutely spot on. If the "cockney mafia" was clueless about the "area" and the Geordie nation, then what on earth will a consortium from Nigeria know about it? Depends if they bring in someone to do the job day-to-day - like a Mort or a Quinn - as has been said a few times I think it was the perceived absentee landlord approach that people objected to rather than where the mafia were from as such. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChezGiven Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Is it just me who doesn't like the look if the Nigerian bid? Apparently their latest offer is £200m which Ashley won't accept. They say they won't go higher because that will leave them with no funds for transfers, development etc. Waste of time if that's true. I can't fault them for trying to lowball someone who wants out. Yeah, that letter was genius from Ashley. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LooneyToonArmy Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 just from the tribalshite website but copied from Guardian Nigerians yet to table offer to Newcastle lawyers 30.09.08 | tribalfootball.com The Nigerian consortium seeking to takeover Newcastle United is still to lodge their bid, it has been revealed. The Guardian says the identity of Newcastle United's prospective purchaser will not be unveiled publicly until the deal is as good as done. As one source close to the situation said: "Money talks but wealth is silent." However, the Nigerian consortium said to be mounting a bid is taking anonymity too far. Despite PR talk of an offer going in, no contact has been made with Newcastle's lawyers about the lodging of a £200m bond. Although there are a number of interested parties the Nigerian group, if one exists, can be discounted as a runner. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 just from the tribalshite website but copied from Guardian Nigerians yet to table offer to Newcastle lawyers 30.09.08 | tribalfootball.com The Nigerian consortium seeking to takeover Newcastle United is still to lodge their bid, it has been revealed. The Guardian says the identity of Newcastle United's prospective purchaser will not be unveiled publicly until the deal is as good as done. As one source close to the situation said: "Money talks but wealth is silent." However, the Nigerian consortium said to be mounting a bid is taking anonymity too far. Despite PR talk of an offer going in, no contact has been made with Newcastle's lawyers about the lodging of a £200m bond. Although there are a number of interested parties the Nigerian group, if one exists, can be discounted as a runner. Well at least they've had their week's free publicity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 just from the tribalshite website but copied from Guardian Nigerians yet to table offer to Newcastle lawyers 30.09.08 | tribalfootball.com The Nigerian consortium seeking to takeover Newcastle United is still to lodge their bid, it has been revealed. The Guardian says the identity of Newcastle United's prospective purchaser will not be unveiled publicly until the deal is as good as done. As one source close to the situation said: "Money talks but wealth is silent." However, the Nigerian consortium said to be mounting a bid is taking anonymity too far. Despite PR talk of an offer going in, no contact has been made with Newcastle's lawyers about the lodging of a £200m bond. Although there are a number of interested parties the Nigerian group, if one exists, can be discounted as a runner. Well at least they've had their week's free publicity. they haven't really as no-one knew who they were in the first place. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Can anyone find that article on the Guardian's website? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Unless we're looking at some Abramovich-style sugardaddy, I can't see that they're going to offer us anything more than Ashley, and in fact, arguably less. What about the SAFC model with a front man backed by a group with enough money between them? Seems to be working. That's a good point, but I'd add 'so far' on to 'seems to be working'. They bought the club cheap, made good choices with their Manager and Chief Exec, and invested well to bring about promotion and then keep the club there. The task of pushing on from where they're at is a different one altogether though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 i still dont think anything will come of the nigerian bid. load of cobblers if you ask me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Is it just me who doesn't like the look if the Nigerian bid? Apparently their latest offer is £200m which Ashley won't accept. They say they won't go higher because that will leave them with no funds for transfers, development etc. Waste of time if that's true. Its not a £200 million bid, that's the bond they were supposed to have lodged with a lawyer to show they were serious about buying the club. A kind of "here's the colour of our money" kind of thing. Not that I know anything about it personally just saying that's what the papers have said. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Perhaps the new owners want to bring in Keegan as Quinn and Shearer as Keane. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Hope this isn't true: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/everton/3107667/Everton-in-takeover-talks-with-Anil-Ambani-Football.html According to reports in the Mirror, Everton chairman Bill Kenwright is in the process of luring Ambani, the sixth richest man in the world with a reputed fortune of £20 billion, to buying the Goodison Park club. Ambani has already been linked with a move for Newcastle and Liverpool, but the possibility of a takeover in the blue half of Merseyside is more likely especially as Kenwright is known to be keen to step down from his current position. Speaking recently Kenwright said: "I do not want to be here next year. "I do not want to be standing in front of you saying, 'It's been another tough season' and 'I don't know where the money is'. I would sell tomorrow." Kenwright, a life-long Everton fan, is known to be keen to secure investment for the club so the team can compete with the so-called 'Big Four', which will require either extra funds beyond his means, or a cash injection to redevelop Goodison Park or move to new stadium. The takeover would doubtless please David Moyes as he seeks to close the gap on the top four clubs, and challenge for a place in the Champions League. Ambani, who is the chairman of the Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group, was voted Businessman of the Year in 2006 by Times Of India. Correct me if I'm wrong but Bill Kenwright doesn't own the club. He can sell Ambani his 33% stake but that wouldn't be enough to trigger a takeover. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Is it just me who doesn't like the look if the Nigerian bid? Apparently their latest offer is £200m which Ashley won't accept. They say they won't go higher because that will leave them with no funds for transfers, development etc. Waste of time if that's true. Its not a £200 million bid, that's the bond they were supposed to have lodged with a lawyer to show they were serious about buying the club. A kind of "here's the colour of our money" kind of thing. Not that I know anything about it personally just saying that's what the papers have said. Always got to bring colour into it haven't you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Is it just me who doesn't like the look if the Nigerian bid? Apparently their latest offer is £200m which Ashley won't accept. They say they won't go higher because that will leave them with no funds for transfers, development etc. Waste of time if that's true. Its not a £200 million bid, that's the bond they were supposed to have lodged with a lawyer to show they were serious about buying the club. A kind of "here's the colour of our money" kind of thing. Not that I know anything about it personally just saying that's what the papers have said. Always got to bring colour into it haven't you. Just can't help myself Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 I'm yet to be convinced about Ambiani and all these stories. With his kind of money, he could walk into just about any Premiership club - including Liverpool or Arsenal - and pick them up without making much of a dent in his wallet. Why all this drawn-out, fiddling around with a club like Everton? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Perhaps the new owners want to bring in Keegan as Quinn and Shearer as Keane. I think that idea has been floated before. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
A.C Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Davig Craig on SSN saying that it isn't true, and that he has talked with Chris Mort who is in North America. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted September 30, 2008 Share Posted September 30, 2008 Until any of the top 5 richest people in the world are rumoured to be interested in buying Newcastle I'm hoping 6th richest man in the world, Ambiani buys us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now