Guest firetotheworks Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Frank Lampard! Are you serious!?? Yes, completely. Cole - cunt Terry - cunt Gerrard - cunt Rooney - cunt Rio - a bit of a cunt Barry - cunt Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest palnese Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Plus, wankers like Fat Frank having a word in the ear. Wtf!? If there's one player in the England squad who doesn't come across like a wanker, it's Frank Lampard. Cheated on his wife though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Plus, wankers like Fat Frank having a word in the ear. Wtf!? If there's one player in the England squad who doesn't come across like a w*****, it's Frank Lampard. Cheated on his wife though? ...and? How many people have done that? It doesn't mean it's right, but it happens, footballers aren't immune to it. On the other hand John Terry cheats on his wife with his best friend and team mates girlfriend. Steven Gerrard smacks someone in a bar, Ashley Cole cheats on his wife, and is a greedy bastard, Rio Ferdinand misses drugs tests, Wayne Rooney cheats on his pregnant wife with prostitutes, and Andy Carroll himself has obviously had his daft moments. And Frank Lampard's the wanker? Christ Almighty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 If what Christine Bleakley said in the papers over the weekend is true, Lampard most definitely isn't a wanker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
J7 Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 To be fair, I was more talking about Lampard having a word in his ear, telling him Chelsea is the place to be etc. My worry wasn't thinking about Rooney whisking Andy away to Soho for some prossy, or John Terry introducing him to his dad to sell him some coke. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Anyone who cheats on Cheryl Tweedy has got to be the biggest fool in the world. :-p Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 To be fair, I was more talking about Lampard having a word in his ear, telling him Chelsea is the place to be etc. Maybe Andy Carroll can tell some of the England players they should come play at Newcastle... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Wonder if any of the Ingerland squad will act awkward towards Carroll. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Wonder if any of the Ingerland squad will act awkward towards Carroll. Doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who would give a fuck anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fugazi Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 twitter:@andycarrollsex Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
broonalegeordie Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Wonder if any of the Ingerland squad will act awkward towards Carroll. Doesn't strike me as the kind of guy who would give a fuck anyway he'd just glass the cunts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Lamps is one of the few current England players I don't really dislike. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Lamps is one of the few current England players I don't really dislike. I agree, he seems like a top bloke tbh. I don't mind Crouch, Defoe or Ledley King either but we do have a lot of cunts in our national team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 A Wallpaper from Sky. 1024 x 768 - http://img.skysports.com/10/10/800x600/1024x768_2520073.jpg 1280 x 1024 - http://img.skysports.com/10/10/Others/1280x1024_2520095.jpg 1600 x 1200 - http://img.skysports.com/10/10/Others/widescreen_2520096.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 tried to have a discussion with a mackem on Saturday night about Andy Carroll. Admittedly he was bias as fuck against 'wor Andy' but the point I tried to put across was about Carroll in relation to 'the Crouch option'. Crouch is forever spoken about as 'giving us [England] something different' and/or 'providing an alternative'. So, says I, 4 England strikers for a squad, 'Rooney, Defoe, Crouch, Bent, yes?' 'Yes' replies mackem. 'OK' I continue, 'but what if Crouch is unavailable for selection? Who is picked instead?' With Bent already picked, mackem begins to fumble around for answers. 'Do you agree we'd still need the 'alternative option' Crouch provides?' I ask. 'Yeah' replies mackem, while trying to swallow a mouthful of cheesy chips. 'OK, so who?' I ask again. 'Whey....Kevin Davies probably' he answers. 'At 33' I ask, 'he is our answer, the future?' 'Well for the time being' I'm told. 'But what about 2012? He'll be 35 or so, and 37 for 2014 in Brazll'. I'm put in my place by mackem, 'we'll sort that when the time comes. Whoever it is, it shouldn't be Carroll!'. I wasn't implying pick Carroll now, but I think its only a matter of time. There's not a great deal of excellent English striking talent about, and for as long as we use Crouch as an example of 'offering something different' with his height, it will only take an injury to him for Carroll to be selected, if he isn't on Saturday night. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 A Wallpaper from Sky. 1024 x 768 - http://img.skysports.com/10/10/800x600/1024x768_2520073.jpg 1280 x 1024 - http://img.skysports.com/10/10/Others/1280x1024_2520095.jpg 1600 x 1200 - http://img.skysports.com/10/10/Others/widescreen_2520096.jpg Why can't they start to realize people don't have small screens like that anymore? Come on! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Icke - Son of God Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 A Wallpaper from Sky. 1024 x 768 - http://img.skysports.com/10/10/800x600/1024x768_2520073.jpg 1280 x 1024 - http://img.skysports.com/10/10/Others/1280x1024_2520095.jpg 1600 x 1200 - http://img.skysports.com/10/10/Others/widescreen_2520096.jpg Coloccini is off to suck his finger. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Why is Roeder getting involved?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Icke - Son of God Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 tried to have a discussion with a mackem on Saturday night about Andy Carroll. Admittedly he was bias as fuck against 'wor Andy' but the point I tried to put across was about Carroll in relation to 'the Crouch option'. Crouch is forever spoken about as 'giving us [England] something different' and/or 'providing an alternative'. So, says I, 4 England strikers for a squad, 'Rooney, Defoe, Crouch, Bent, yes?' 'Yes' replies mackem. 'OK' I continue, 'but what if Crouch is unavailable for selection? Who is picked instead?' With Bent already picked, mackem begins to fumble around for answers. 'Do you agree we'd still need the 'alternative option' Crouch provides?' I ask. 'Yeah' replies mackem, while trying to swallow a mouthful of cheesy chips. 'OK, so who?' I ask again. 'Whey....Kevin Davies probably' he answers. 'At 33' I ask, 'he is our answer, the future?' 'Well for the time being' I'm told. 'But what about 2012? He'll be 35 or so, and 37 for 2014 in Brazll'. I'm put in my place by mackem, 'we'll sort that when the time comes. Whoever it is, it shouldn't be Carroll!'. I wasn't implying pick Carroll now, but I think its only a matter of time. There's not a great deal of excellent English striking talent about, and for as long as we use Crouch as an example of 'offering something different' with his height, it will only take an injury to him for Carroll to be selected, if he isn't on Saturday night. Carroll is a better option that Crouch because he's is actually good in the air. Crouch shrinks about two foot when required to jump for a header. Not that you'll get a Tackem to admit that mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 I have to say it feels good to have the new exciting young English player at our club for a change. Been reading other forums and many other fans would love to sign him but think he's out of their price range . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colocho Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Chelsea, Man Utd or Liverpool. Don't think he'd be stupid enough to consider City. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 tried to have a discussion with a mackem on Saturday night about Andy Carroll. Admittedly he was bias as f*** against 'wor Andy' but the point I tried to put across was about Carroll in relation to 'the Crouch option'. Crouch is forever spoken about as 'giving us [England] something different' and/or 'providing an alternative'. So, says I, 4 England strikers for a squad, 'Rooney, Defoe, Crouch, Bent, yes?' 'Yes' replies mackem. 'OK' I continue, 'but what if Crouch is unavailable for selection? Who is picked instead?' With Bent already picked, mackem begins to fumble around for answers. 'Do you agree we'd still need the 'alternative option' Crouch provides?' I ask. 'Yeah' replies mackem, while trying to swallow a mouthful of cheesy chips. 'OK, so who?' I ask again. 'Whey....Kevin Davies probably' he answers. 'At 33' I ask, 'he is our answer, the future?' 'Well for the time being' I'm told. 'But what about 2012? He'll be 35 or so, and 37 for 2014 in Brazll'. I'm put in my place by mackem, 'we'll sort that when the time comes. Whoever it is, it shouldn't be CarrollPlay for the mags!'. I wasn't implying pick Carroll now, but I think its only a matter of time. There's not a great deal of excellent English striking talent about, and for as long as we use Crouch as an example of 'offering something different' with his height, it will only take an injury to him for Carroll to be selected, if he isn't on Saturday night. What he meant Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kenton Magpie Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 As good as Carroll has been for us this year I reckon a England call so soon will go to the lads head and with that will come a number of issues on and off the pitch Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 Maybe he'll just stay here.. who knows could happen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted November 9, 2010 Share Posted November 9, 2010 As good as Carroll has been for us this year I reckon a England call so soon will go to the lads head and with that will come a number of issues on and off the pitch I agree. I think his act needs to mature on the pitch as well. He can be a bit naive in his decision-making and still has a bit to learn. But he has the talent to be an international player. Obviously. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts