madras Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Howay thejapanexperience you know you want to post something. I can see you there. He's got you on ignore. I'm sure he's not the only one. he's no spork74 mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Howay thejapanexperience you know you want to post something. I can see you there. He's got you on ignore. I'm sure he's not the only one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hughesy Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 The problem is that if Carroll is sold, the club won't see any of the cash. We all know where it will be going.... where ? Ashley's pocket. He wants the money back that he has loaned to the club - how else is he going to get it back? other than assumption and wild accusations has that ever been proven? He didn't give us it as a gift, I'm sure. And he can't just go "Ah, cheers. I'll have that." and withdraw it to from the bank. If it's 'debt' or 'loan' then there are regulations to follow about repayments and so on. He can't just take it. Well - that does depend entirely on the terms of the loan agreement. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 The problem is that if Carroll is sold, the club won't see any of the cash. We all know where it will be going.... where ? Ashley's pocket. He wants the money back that he has loaned to the club - how else is he going to get it back? other than assumption and wild accusations has that ever been proven? He didn't give us it as a gift, I'm sure. And he can't just go "Ah, cheers. I'll have that." and withdraw it to from the bank. If it's 'debt' or 'loan' then there are regulations to follow about repayments and so on. He can't just take it. Maybe not, but there's nothing to stop him just using the money to keep the club running. It takes £20m of outside investment every year. Well yeah, but that's not what Big Geordie was saying. It not being spent on transfer is slightly different to the naive suggestion that it's going straight into Ashley's pockets. I don't see the difference, personally. In that scenario it wouldn't be going into the playing staff and would help Ashley's pocket instead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 The problem is that if Carroll is sold, the club won't see any of the cash. We all know where it will be going.... where ? Ashley's pocket. He wants the money back that he has loaned to the club - how else is he going to get it back? other than assumption and wild accusations has that ever been proven? He didn't give us it as a gift, I'm sure. And he can't just go "Ah, cheers. I'll have that." and withdraw it to from the bank. If it's 'debt' or 'loan' then there are regulations to follow about repayments and so on. He can't just take it. Maybe not, but there's nothing to stop him just using the money to keep the club running. It takes £20m of outside investment every year. Well yeah, but that's not what Big Geordie was saying. It not being spent on transfer is slightly different to the naive suggestion that it's going straight into Ashley's pockets. I don't see the difference, personally. In that scenario it wouldn't be going into the playing staff and would help Ashley's pocket. do you not think money for the club should come through the club and not out of a benefactors pocket ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Howay thejapanexperience you know you want to post something. I can see you there. He's got you on ignore. I'm sure he's not the only one. he's no spork74 mind. fuck me. 46 days online. Howay Sporky son/love. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 The problem is that if Carroll is sold, the club won't see any of the cash. We all know where it will be going.... where ? Ashley's pocket. He wants the money back that he has loaned to the club - how else is he going to get it back? other than assumption and wild accusations has that ever been proven? He didn't give us it as a gift, I'm sure. And he can't just go "Ah, cheers. I'll have that." and withdraw it to from the bank. If it's 'debt' or 'loan' then there are regulations to follow about repayments and so on. He can't just take it. Maybe not, but there's nothing to stop him just using the money to keep the club running. It takes £20m of outside investment every year. Well yeah, but that's not what Big Geordie was saying. It not being spent on transfer is slightly different to the naive suggestion that it's going straight into Ashley's pockets. I don't see the difference, personally. In that scenario it wouldn't be going into the playing staff and would help Ashley's pocket. do you not think money for the club should come through the club and not out of a benefactors pocket ? Yes. But then I don't believe the club is anywhere near as helplessly incapable as providing for itself as you do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 The problem is that if Carroll is sold, the club won't see any of the cash. We all know where it will be going.... where ? Ashley's pocket. He wants the money back that he has loaned to the club - how else is he going to get it back? other than assumption and wild accusations has that ever been proven? He didn't give us it as a gift, I'm sure. And he can't just go "Ah, cheers. I'll have that." and withdraw it to from the bank. If it's 'debt' or 'loan' then there are regulations to follow about repayments and so on. He can't just take it. Maybe not, but there's nothing to stop him just using the money to keep the club running. It takes £20m of outside investment every year. Well yeah, but that's not what Big Geordie was saying. It not being spent on transfer is slightly different to the naive suggestion that it's going straight into Ashley's pockets. I don't see the difference, personally. In that scenario it wouldn't be going into the playing staff and would help Ashley's pocket. do you not think money for the club should come through the club and not out of a benefactors pocket ? Yes. But then I don't believe the club is anywhere near as incapable as providing for itself as you do. then i hope the club spends it's money instead of his. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 The problem is that if Carroll is sold, the club won't see any of the cash. We all know where it will be going.... where ? Ashley's pocket. He wants the money back that he has loaned to the club - how else is he going to get it back? other than assumption and wild accusations has that ever been proven? He didn't give us it as a gift, I'm sure. And he can't just go "Ah, cheers. I'll have that." and withdraw it to from the bank. If it's 'debt' or 'loan' then there are regulations to follow about repayments and so on. He can't just take it. Maybe not, but there's nothing to stop him just using the money to keep the club running. It takes £20m of outside investment every year or we do a Portsmouth remember. It HAS taken around £20m a season, doesn't mean it will this season or the next and do a Portsmouth?, no I don't think so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Look up 'facetious'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Will I see your picture? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 Quite possible actually. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 I googled it and got this: http://fermentation.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c64d253ef0115700f848a970b-800wi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 "If you look up 'stupid' in the dictionary, you'll see a picture of your face" "Well I'm not the one that has to look up 'stupid' in the dictionary..." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted January 15, 2011 Share Posted January 15, 2011 "If you look up 'stupid' in the dictionary, you'll see a picture of your face" "Well I'm not the one that has to look up 'stupid' in the dictionary..." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 I googled it and got this: http://fermentation.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c64d253ef0115700f848a970b-800wi http://img593.imageshack.us/img593/6113/24262033.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 £30m is crazy money for Carroll mind. I echo what others have said, I wouldn't sell him at all as it puts a marker down of our ambition, especially with him being home grown. But £30m. Jesus. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 For £30m we could get a lot of new players......but not replace AC9 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 For £30m we could get a lot of new players......but not replace AC9 Definitely but that could be for the best. I, however, would not trust AP with £30m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Carroll might not be worth £30m but he is worth far more than £30m to us imo. He really should be the future of this club. We have a handful of fantastic players and the foundation to build something special. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest geordie01 Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 work in hotel newcastle players are stayin in tonight. word is he's definitely been sold! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Why would they stay in a hotel for a game 12 miles away? They stayed in London for the Stevenage match which is about 35 miles away Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 danny simpson tweeted earlier that they are in a hotel tonight Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 16, 2011 Share Posted January 16, 2011 Why would they stay in a hotel for a game 12 miles away? They stayed in London for the Stevenage match which is about 35 miles away Team bonding. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts