JB Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 I hear it 10p in every fourth £5 of a fee over £6.8m less than what he received in the second installment in the third quarter of the last tax deductable annum. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Again, I can't see him signing for the cockneys when he is supposed to have been 'home sick' since he moved to Liverpool. Don't forget that he would be reunited with his buddy, Kevin Nolan. The Dream Team reunited . It would be a good move for all concerned really. Carroll would fit in well with Allardyce's ethos. Go on then Sullivan/Gold/Brady, make Carroll an offer he can't refuse so that he doesn't end up back here! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Recoba Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 The opinions on here are different to the ones I have heard in real life. The first poll is much more reflective of general opinion I reckon. People would quite like him back. Who really thinks we would consider £20 million? We are opportunistic and looking to rape Liverpool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 West Ham have stepped up their interest in Liverpool striker Andy Carroll by making a bid that could potentially break the club's transfer record. The fresh offer would see Carroll initially move on loan with a commitment to buy the 23-year-old next summer in a deal worth more than £15m. However, it is understood he does not view West Ham as a serious option. The England international's preference, should he be forced to leave Anfield, is still to return to Newcastle United. The Tyneside club, who retain a strong interest in the player, are monitoring the situation. so basically what we already had rejected but with a lot more risk for Liverpool Yup as I've said a few times the porn barons have season tickets to sell and what better way than create false hope of signing a "big name" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 The opinions on here are different to the ones I have heard in real life. gets me every time that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 West Ham have stepped up their interest in Liverpool striker Andy Carroll by making a bid that could potentially break the club's transfer record. The fresh offer would see Carroll initially move on loan with a commitment to buy the 23-year-old next summer in a deal worth more than £15m. However, it is understood he does not view West Ham as a serious option. The England international's preference, should he be forced to leave Anfield, is still to return to Newcastle United. The Tyneside club, who retain a strong interest in the player, are monitoring the situation. so basically what we already had rejected but with a lot more risk for Liverpool money offered than we did. Yup as I've said a few times the porn barons have season tickets to sell and what better way than create false hope of signing a "big name" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Mirror reckon they've offered £17m as the permanent fee. They also reckon ours was £13m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Mirror reckon they've offered £17m as the permanent fee. They also reckon ours was £13m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 What they offer is irrelevant if Carroll doesn't want the move. The club could accept any offer but if he digs his heels in then he goes nowhere. Literally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
olliemort Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 13 million is too much for him evermind 17 million. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Given that Joe fucking Allen is being talked about as a £10million player, Carroll is probably valued correctly as circa £15million. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 He would do well at West Ham because they would build a side around him. Here he should be a backup player and that isn't going to help his career. Would keep West Ham where they belong, just below mid-table. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 17m for a striker that scored 4 league goals last season and didn't miss too much of the season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Given that Joe f***ing Allen is being talked about as a £10million player, Carroll is probably valued correctly as circa £15million. Joe Allen is 100x the footballer Carroll will ever be. I'd pay 10m for Allen and not even blink. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 That's it, I'm getting out of here. *slams door* Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuy_O Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 What has Joe Allen done to achieve such a price tag though? 15 million is an outragous fee if Liverpool are paying it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 What has Joe Allen done to achieve such a price tag though? 15 million is an outragous fee. I never said he's worth that much but he's a miles better footballer than Carroll that's for damn sure. Sure his price is inflated but whose isn't these days? unlike Carroll he has ability just because Liverpool look like signing him don't mean i have to completely ignore that and pretend he's s***. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 I thought we'd in effect bid 13 million, it's a pr stunt and alot of bollocks imo. Do we have to break our club record now to compete? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
toontownman Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Mirror reckon they've offered £17m as the permanent fee. They also reckon ours was £13m. Aside from the fact it is the Mirror it sounds about right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuy_O Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Not saying he's rubbish and he will no doubt be perfect for what Rodgers has planned, but your talking about someone who had a decent season and nothing more than that (imo). Thought Liverpool would have learned their lesson by now with Henderson. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Thought he was poor tonight (Allen) Ramsey should be starting ahead of him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 I didnt realise the icelandics took over again, theyll no doubt match his wages and give him a 5 year deal, why worry to them itll only be 37 million quid, easily affordable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Thought he was poor tonight (Allen) Ramsey should be starting ahead of him. Didn't watch the game but i have seen enough for Swansea that shows his quality and unlike Henderson ( terrible comparison) he can actually pass forwards, create and dribble. Henderson is just awful. Besides i'm pretty sure most players look awful under the coaching of Stuart f*cking Pearce Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Thought he was poor tonight (Allen) Ramsey should be starting ahead of him. Didn't watch the game but i have seen enough for Swansea that shows his quality and unlike Henderson ( terrible comparison) he can actually pass forwards, create and dribble. Henderson is just awful. Besides i'm pretty sure most players look awful under the coaching of Stuart f*cking Pearce Tonight was my first real live watch of him, I expected more, but one swallow and all that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stuy_O Posted July 26, 2012 Share Posted July 26, 2012 Thought he was poor tonight (Allen) Ramsey should be starting ahead of him. Didn't watch the game but i have seen enough for Swansea that shows his quality and unlike Henderson ( terrible comparison) he can actually pass forwards, create and dribble. Henderson is just awful. Besides i'm pretty sure most players look awful under the coaching of Stuart f*cking Pearce This I wholeheartedly agree with. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts