NG32 Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 We should make it a bootable offence to ask for a ban............. http://blog2.sidz.id.au/images/toobdnatrab-xp052.jpg NOBS Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PM Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Posting in this thread should be a bannable offence. Oh.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Posting in this thread should be a bannable offence. Oh.... Fucking ban everyone for a month, go on . do it! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Libertine Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 We should make it a bootable offence to ask for a ban............. http://blog2.sidz.id.au/images/toobdnatrab-xp052.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Offshore Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 ...should never have left the Dell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 We should make it a bootable offence to ask for a ban............. http://blog2.sidz.id.au/images/toobdnatrab-xp052.jpg I take it you originally didn't realise that website has a ban on hotlinking and thus replaces any hotlinked image with a massive 'I HAVE A SMALL PENIS' image? What confuses me the most is that you chose not to edit your post. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 What is it that really caused their financial strife? Was it just the new stadium or were / are their wages still unsustainable in that leage? Got a fair old slice of cash out of the Walcott and Bale sales. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Sad. Tbh. Quite liked Southampton. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Neil Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Sad. Tbh. Quite liked Southampton. Why are you posting on-topic? :frantic: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
La Parka Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Leeds mag is a cunt. Fucking cunt of a cunt. O shit ban meh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 We all hate Leeds scum, We all hate Leeds scum Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest getcarter Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Why is it that Southampton are being punished, but West Ham, whose parent company Hansa is also bankrupt, seem to be getting away with it scot free? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Why is it that Southampton are being punished, but West Ham, whose parent company Hansa is also bankrupt, seem to be getting away with it scot free? Cos we all know that West Ham can get away with anything from bankruptcy to fielding illegable players without as much as a raised eyebrow.... Seriously though Does this mean that Hansa is not West Ham's parent company? Is West Ham really the illegitimate child of football? Find out in our next gripping installment..... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Why is it that Southampton are being punished, but West Ham, whose parent company Hansa is also bankrupt, seem to be getting away with it scot free? Very odd that!!They seem to get away with a lot don't they..wonder if Brooking has pulled a few strings Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Why is it that Southampton are being punished, but West Ham, whose parent company Hansa is also bankrupt, seem to be getting away with it scot free? 1.The Holding Company has no income of its own; all revenue and expenditure is derived from the operation of Southampton Football Club Limited (SFC) and the associated stadium company. 2.The Holding company is solvent in its own right. It only becomes insolvent when account is taken of the position of SFC and the other group companies. 3.The three entities (the Holding Company, SFC and the stadium company) comprise the football club and they are inextricably linked as one economic entity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Why is it that Southampton are being punished, but West Ham, whose parent company Hansa is also bankrupt, seem to be getting away with it scot free? because West Ham has been somehow magically able to pay for all of their shit, Southampton haven't. it's kind of sad how there's been all this talk of them being bankrupt, yet they still manage to outspend us in the transfer market. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest gggg Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 A big lesson to be learnt here. Doing 'a Leeds' is very dangerous, doing 'a Southampton' is equally dangerous, and pointless. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mistle17 Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Controversy and club decisions apart, I think its a great shame to see another club like Southampton drop to the 3rd tier... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Apparently in 2003 Gordon Strachan knocked back the chance to sign two French Second Division players who would have cost £3m between them. There names were Florent Malouda & Didier Drogba. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ebolarama Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Apparently in 2003 Gordon Strachan knocked back the chance to sign two French Second Division players who would have cost £3m between them. There names were Florent Malouda & Didier Drogba. Wenger missed the boat with Drogba too. So it goes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 People forget Drogba was a no one until that season with Marsielle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mistle17 Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Apparently Sheffield United turned down the chance to sign Diego Maradonna as he was too expensive. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE5 Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Apparently in 2003 Gordon Strachan knocked back the chance to sign two French Second Division players who would have cost £3m between them. There names were Florent Malouda & Didier Drogba. so much for professional expertise. Of course, this is a manager who thinks he's good because he beats one team to a title. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 What's ridiculous is the fact that West Ham are in the same situation as Southampton (holding company in admin) yet nothing at all has happened to them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GG Posted April 23, 2009 Share Posted April 23, 2009 Apparently in 2003 Gordon Strachan knocked back the chance to sign two French Second Division players who would have cost £3m between them. There names were Florent Malouda & Didier Drogba. so much for professional expertise. Of course, this is a manager who thinks he's good because he beats one team to a title. It ought to be noted that Rupert Lowe vetoed the signing of Drogba on account of wage demands and attitude and I believe the other player was Emmanuel Adebayor (who was refused a work-permit) as opposed to Malouda. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now