Dinho lad Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 shit decision if we're not getting in a replacement! What use would be a replacement for someone rubbish who doesn't play? We need a striker whether Xisco fucks off or not. you're disagreeing with me there and then agreeing again. what the fuck you're on?? Eh? You're saying this is a shit decision if someone else doesn't come in. And what makes you think that Xisco wasn't going to play a part in this season, before today? we're not exactly blessed with quantity or quality upfront, are we? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,11678_5528072,00.html Xisco heads back to Spain Henrique seals loan switch By Chris Burton Last updated: 31st August 2009 Racing Santander have sealed loan deals for Newcastle forward Xisco and Barcelona defender Henrique. Spanish ace Xisco only moved to England in September 2008 but struggled to make an impact in a Magpies side which slipped out of the Premier League. He has also been plagued by injuries and was unable to fulfil his potential while on Tyneside. The 23-year-old has agreed a season-long deal with Racing. Henrique is also set to spend the remainder of the 2009/10 campaign in Santander. The 21-year-old Brazilian, who is yet to force his way into first-team reckoning at Barca on a regular basis, spent last season on loan at German outfit Bayer Leverkusen. Both men will join up with their new team-mates upon passing a medical. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Lets face it, Xisco was a non-player being payed however many thousand a week to play training games against our starting XI, so we aren't really losing a player as the the managers have all rather played other players/youngsters/new formations/players out of position over playing Xisco, and therefore we are just saving money as best as we can. What makes you think they're paying all his wages? This way, they get a player and we still pay him to do fuck all, but this time he's not there if we need to throw him on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
clintdempsey Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Francisco Jiménez Tejada XISCO was born in Santa Ponsa, Palma de Mallorca, 26 June 1986. Measured 186 centimeters and weighs approximately 84 pounds. No wonder he's looked so fucking weak. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 shit decision if we're not getting in a replacement! What use would be a replacement for someone rubbish who doesn't play? We need a striker whether Xisco fucks off or not. you're disagreeing with me there and then agreeing again. what the fuck you're on?? Eh? You're saying this is a shit decision if someone else doesn't come in. And what makes you think that Xisco wasn't going to play a part in this season, before today? we're not exactly blessed with quantity or quality upfront, are we? The fact that he's only played 45mins so far? I know we're not blessed with quantity or quality up front, but Xisco leaving doesn't change that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 shit decision if we're not getting in a replacement! What use would be a replacement for someone rubbish who doesn't play? We need a striker whether Xisco fucks off or not. you're disagreeing with me there and then agreeing again. what the fuck you're on?? Eh? You're saying this is a shit decision if someone else doesn't come in. And what makes you think that Xisco wasn't going to play a part in this season, before today? we're not exactly blessed with quantity or quality upfront, are we? Because he only gets on if two out of Shola, Carroll, Ranger and Nolan aren't available/need to come off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 shit decision if we're not getting in a replacement! What use would be a replacement for someone rubbish who doesn't play? We need a striker whether Xisco fucks off or not. you're disagreeing with me there and then agreeing again. what the fuck you're on?? Eh? You're saying this is a shit decision if someone else doesn't come in. And what makes you think that Xisco wasn't going to play a part in this season, before today? we're not exactly blessed with quantity or quality upfront, are we? The fact that he's only played 45mins so far? I know we're not blessed with quantity or quality up front, but Xisco leaving doesn't change that. Surely the option of having him there to come on is better than having to play a midfielder up front? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 shit decision if we're not getting in a replacement! What use would be a replacement for someone rubbish who doesn't play? We need a striker whether Xisco fucks off or not. you're disagreeing with me there and then agreeing again. what the fuck you're on?? Eh? You're saying this is a shit decision if someone else doesn't come in. And what makes you think that Xisco wasn't going to play a part in this season, before today? we're not exactly blessed with quantity or quality upfront, are we? The fact that he's only played 45mins so far? I know we're not blessed with quantity or quality up front, but Xisco leaving doesn't change that. Surely the option of having him there to come on is better than having to play a midfielder up front? The current manager doesn't think so, and I tend to agree with him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Lets face it, Xisco was a non-player being payed however many thousand a week to play training games against our starting XI, so we aren't really losing a player as the the managers have all rather played other players/youngsters/new formations/players out of position over playing Xisco, and therefore we are just saving money as best as we can. What makes you think they're paying all his wages? This way, they get a player and we still pay him to do fuck all, but this time he's not there if we need to throw him on. Obviously they're paying at least a significant portion of his wages, otherwise there's no fucking point of loaning him out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 shit decision if we're not getting in a replacement! What use would be a replacement for someone rubbish who doesn't play? We need a striker whether Xisco fucks off or not. you're disagreeing with me there and then agreeing again. what the fuck you're on?? Eh? You're saying this is a shit decision if someone else doesn't come in. And what makes you think that Xisco wasn't going to play a part in this season, before today? we're not exactly blessed with quantity or quality upfront, are we? The fact that he's only played 45mins so far? I know we're not blessed with quantity or quality up front, but Xisco leaving doesn't change that. Maybe that's because shola and caroll are our first choice front 2, no?? Injuries, suspensions or bad form... and we're fucked! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 all our managers stubbornly wouldn't pick xisco, so he may as well go to reduce our wage bill. now we just have to get rid of the other invisible player (geremi) and replace them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Lets face it, Xisco was a non-player being payed however many thousand a week to play training games against our starting XI, so we aren't really losing a player as the the managers have all rather played other players/youngsters/new formations/players out of position over playing Xisco, and therefore we are just saving money as best as we can. What makes you think they're paying all his wages? This way, they get a player and we still pay him to do f*** all, but this time he's not there if we need to throw him on. Obviously they're paying at least a significant portion of his wages, otherwise there's no f***ing point of loaning him out. This is Newcastle United remember. We're probably paying his wages in full and giving them £6m for the burden of taking him for the year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 shit decision if we're not getting in a replacement! What use would be a replacement for someone rubbish who doesn't play? We need a striker whether Xisco fucks off or not. you're disagreeing with me there and then agreeing again. what the fuck you're on?? Eh? You're saying this is a shit decision if someone else doesn't come in. And what makes you think that Xisco wasn't going to play a part in this season, before today? we're not exactly blessed with quantity or quality upfront, are we? The fact that he's only played 45mins so far? I know we're not blessed with quantity or quality up front, but Xisco leaving doesn't change that. Maybe that's because shola and caroll are our first choice front 2, no?? Injuries, suspensions or bad form... and we're fucked! Ranger and Nolan also play ahead of him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Lets face it, Xisco was a non-player being payed however many thousand a week to play training games against our starting XI, so we aren't really losing a player as the the managers have all rather played other players/youngsters/new formations/players out of position over playing Xisco, and therefore we are just saving money as best as we can. What makes you think they're paying all his wages? This way, they get a player and we still pay him to do f*** all, but this time he's not there if we need to throw him on. Obviously they're paying at least a significant portion of his wages, otherwise there's no f***ing point of loaning him out. This is Newcastle United remember. We're probably paying his wages in full and giving them £6m for the burden of taking him for the year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 all our managers stubbornly wouldn't pick xisco, so he may as well go to reduce our wage bill. now we just have to get rid of the other invisible player (geremi) and replace them. Brilliant So they didn't pick him out of principle? As opposed to what they saw of him that we didn't (training et all)? Ok. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 If we got rid of all of our shit players we'd only have 5 left tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 shit decision if we're not getting in a replacement! What use would be a replacement for someone rubbish who doesn't play? We need a striker whether Xisco fucks off or not. you're disagreeing with me there and then agreeing again. what the fuck you're on?? Eh? You're saying this is a shit decision if someone else doesn't come in. And what makes you think that Xisco wasn't going to play a part in this season, before today? we're not exactly blessed with quantity or quality upfront, are we? The fact that he's only played 45mins so far? I know we're not blessed with quantity or quality up front, but Xisco leaving doesn't change that. Maybe that's because shola and caroll are our first choice front 2, no?? Injuries, suspensions or bad form... and we're fucked! Ranger and Nolan also play ahead of him. Ok, say Smith or Guthrie or Barton get injuries, suspension etc..... who's going to replace them? Oh yeah Nolan.......and who the fuck is going to replace Nolan, then? And what's this relience on nile ranger thing? Is he even ready yet? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 all our managers stubbornly wouldn't pick xisco, so he may as well go to reduce our wage bill. now we just have to get rid of the other invisible player (geremi) and replace them. Brilliant So they didn't pick him out of principle? As opposed to what they saw of him that we didn't (training et all)? Ok. he probably was rubbish in training, but there were times when the whole youth team would get on the bench ahead of him, which was strange. was he really THAT bad? and then there were the rumours last season of one more game triggering a payment - although he's played for us this season so maybe its wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 If we got rid of all of our shit players we'd only have 5 left tbh 5? Always said you were too optimistic! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Jimenez and Wise to thank for this fiasco of a player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 If we got rid of all of our shit players we'd only have 5 left tbh 5? Always said you were too optimistic! I picked that out of the air. If I thought about it I'd struggle to get to five Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Jimenez and Wise to thank for this fiasco of a player. Keegan only bought the good ones Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Libertine Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Jimenez and Wise to thank for this fiasco of a player. "When I flew in on Monday, the club presented me to Kevin Keegan. He talked to me in a bit of detail about his plans for the footballing development of the club. 'That was an important moment for me in my decision to accept this incredible turn of events." if keegan didnt want him he had a funny way of showing it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest wshmag Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Good, he's shit & queer Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TheKingOfNewcastle Posted August 31, 2009 Share Posted August 31, 2009 Jimenez and Wise to thank for this fiasco of a player. if keegan didnt want him he had a funny way of showing it. He resigned the next day. Good enough way of showing it for me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now