lovejoy Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 they are not related, but are past business partners, and may even have some current partnership dealings. the guy who owns BNS telecoms (Garry Moat) is a pretty wealthy fella. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mouldy_uk Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 As I'm bored, from the BNS website: Barry Moat Non-Executive Chairman Barry Moat, founder and former Chief Executive of Premier Direct Group plc, joined BNS in October 2004. He was appointed non executive chairman in October 2008. Barry is not related to the Chief Executive Garry Moat. Garry Moat Chief Executive Garry Moat founded BNS in 1996 following several senior sales positions within communications hardware and engineering businesses. He has held the position of Chief Executive since the incorporation of BNS. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 http://h.imagehost.org/0080/garry_moat_0.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie jamie Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Freddy is not in with anyone There will be significant developments today Will update later when I know and understand there is nothing on the chron website Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 Garry and Barry Moat. Sounds like a wrestling tag team from Wigan. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
clintdempsey Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 It would probably be Mr. Sale of the Daily Mail who'll break it, wouldn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lovejoy Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Why should we believe you? How do you know .com? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. I never believe anything I read on .com after I attempted to get an article published and after some bullshitting from me, they did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Trying to paint Keegan as the devil again, and to blame for EVERYTHING that's gone wrong, perhaps? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Trying to paint Keegan as the devil again, and to blame for EVERYTHING that's gone wrong, perhaps? Well, it's working so far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Why should we believe you? How do you know .com? Actually thinking now, its complete bollocks, we reduced our 40m overdraft to 20m meaning there is 20m left. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Trying to paint Keegan as the devil again, and to blame for EVERYTHING that's gone wrong, perhaps? The actual article on there doesnt blame KK though, its accusing Ashley of scaremongering. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Trying to paint Keegan as the devil again, and to blame for EVERYTHING that's gone wrong, perhaps? The actual article on there doesnt blame KK though, its accusing Ashley of scaremongering. I didn't mean .com, I meant these supposed 'insiders'. The story has got out to a few places. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 HAs anyone noticed that picture of roy keane on their makes him look like hes iraqi? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Why should we believe you? How do you know .com? Actually thinking now, its complete bollocks, we reduced our 40m overdraft to 20m meaning there is 20m left. Our overdraft LIMIT was £40m(may have been £39m) its highily unlikely we were on the limit for so many months. No way it would have taken so long to sell in that case. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 The overdraft was £39m (confirmed on .cock), and the reports were that we were using £25m of it. Barclays wanted both of these figures reducing considering our relegation, and particularly if someone with significantly less disposable cash (ie Moat) took over. Barclays have probably been begging Ashley to stay. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Why should we believe you? How do you know .com? Actually thinking now, its complete bollocks, we reduced our 40m overdraft to 20m meaning there is 20m left. Our overdraft LIMIT was £40m(may have been £39m) its highily unlikely we were on the limit for so many months. No way it would have taken so long to sell in that case. I never said we were at our LIMIT. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Trying to paint Keegan as the devil again, and to blame for EVERYTHING that's gone wrong, perhaps? Huh? How would the club benifit from releasing a story that their incompetence might see the club go into administration. Just more tabloid tosh imho. ADMINISTRATION! Find out more in your soopa sooraway SUN! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Trying to paint Keegan as the devil again, and to blame for EVERYTHING that's gone wrong, perhaps? Huh? How would the club benifit from releasing a story that their incompetence might see the club go into administration. Just more tabloid tosh imho. If they blame Keegan they're absolving themselves of incompetence... Probably agree with your second point anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 HAs anyone noticed that picture of roy keane on their makes him look like hes iraqi? You're joking, yeah? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 .com claim 'club insiders' claim (lot of claims i know) that the keegan payout could force us into administartion. Trying to paint Keegan as the devil again, and to blame for EVERYTHING that's gone wrong, perhaps? Huh? How would the club benifit from releasing a story that their incompetence might see the club go into administration. Just more tabloid tosh imho. If they blame Keegan they're absolving themselves of incompetence... Agree with your second point like. How would Keegan winning all that compo put the blame on Keegan. It would put it at the feet of those that allowed the money grabbing gittm to have a case, no? People love these evil conspiracies, but honesly, it's just more tabloid toss man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
relámpago blanco Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 HAs anyone noticed that picture of roy keane on their makes him look like hes iraqi? You're joking, yeah? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
clintdempsey Posted September 24, 2009 Share Posted September 24, 2009 HAs anyone noticed that picture of roy keane on their makes him look like hes iraqi? You're joking, yeah? Looks more iranian to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts