Parky Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Kids these days seem to be more interested in playing computer football then the real thing. When I was a kid we'd spend most evenings outside kicking a ball around because we had nothing else to do, now kids just want to go into a room and play football on a computer against mates who want to do the same thing. I'm not saying our coaching isn't a fault but I do think the pool of young players is smaller than it used to be. Think that's part of the picture as well. Some of the heart has gone out of the domestic game and has been replaced by hair gel and alice bands ( I wonder where they came from??) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Laughing stock of Europe. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Only 4 teams in Europe can laugh at us tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmelads Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Thing Hodgson and England made the most of an extremely messy buildup to the tournament. Whatever people say about Lampard, and a lot of bollocks has been said down the years by tabloid journos, he's a massive danger in the right areas, he can play people in and his presence was missed. Gerrard did his best but we needed someone else in midfield, a cool head capable of a defence splitting pass, switching the play quickly or striking from distance and Lampard ticks those boxes. Parker is a pretty limited player but he does what he's told and gives his all. It typified England's performance here and throughout the tournament - disciplined but lacking skill or flair. Hodgson will come out of it with credit and he deserves to. Looking at the England squad we had to play the way we did, we're in a period of transition with a weaker generation of players than the previous one and injuries throughout the team. We were a penalty shootout away from the semis. I think the Germans have been overhyped this time around and struggled against Portugal but they will have a major advantage with 2 days' extra rest, not to mention the extra time the Italians played. Credit to Italy, the better team went through. At least England leave with their heads held high and have something to build upon for 2014. By then, new players will come through and we should be able to attack it with a stronger squad. We've had just the same type of displays at previous tournaments when Lampard was in the side playing at his supposed peak. It's complete bollocks to think he'd have made any difference now when he's nowhere near the player he was. Don't think he'd have made much difference because we were outplayed across the field. But we lacked any composure in midfield which was actually my point. It maybe your point but it's not what you wrote. Yes it is, you've even highlighted it in bold. We needed someone else in midfield, a cool head capable of a defence splitting pass, switching the play quickly or striking from distance. Pirlo was the difference in that respect but I'm not saying Lampard would have filled that gap. It was merely another injury loss England didn't need in a tough game and Hodgson made best of what he had available. We rode our luck a bit and fought hard but we just didn't have the quality espescially in midfield. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 England's dismal failure at the World Cup can be blamed on the Premier League's inability to promote home-grown talent, according to the president of Spain's La Liga. José Luis Astiazarán has questioned the number of young foreign players at Premier League clubs and said the principal reason Spain have reached Sunday's final against Holland is that "77.1%" of footballers in their domestic league are Spanish-qualified, a direct result of home-grown players being given the opportunity in their clubs' first teams. In the Premier League fewer than 40% of players are English. "In La Liga there are 77.1% Spanish players, 16.7% European and 6.7% non-European," Astiazarán said. "Our strategy is to work very hard with young home-grown players and to try to have a mix between them and experienced players. "Why is it not a high number of foreign players in La Liga? Because we invest more and more in young Spanish players than in young foreign players. England has many times taken young players from outside who are 14, 16 years old. These kind of players are not English. This is one of the most important differences between Spain and England. We invest in young Spanish players. In Arsenal, Liverpool, Manchester United there are a lot of young Spanish, French and Italian players – maybe this is why at the moment you are not creating young English players. "These [young foreign] players cannot play for the English national team. It's good to have goalkeepers from outside. But how many English goalkeepers are in the Premier League?" Astiazarán said that unlike their English counterparts, Spanish clubs take youth development very seriously and are prepared to give young players opportunities in their first teams. "Spanish teams are working with a very serious strategy in the formation of young players," he said. "The players who become attached to clubs are from the local area and there is a fidelity [each way] and they start playing in the first division at 16 or 17." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe_F Posted June 24, 2012 Share Posted June 24, 2012 Thing Hodgson and England made the most of an extremely messy buildup to the tournament. Whatever people say about Lampard, and a lot of bollocks has been said down the years by tabloid journos, he's a massive danger in the right areas, he can play people in and his presence was missed. Gerrard did his best but we needed someone else in midfield, a cool head capable of a defence splitting pass, switching the play quickly or striking from distance and Lampard ticks those boxes. Parker is a pretty limited player but he does what he's told and gives his all. It typified England's performance here and throughout the tournament - disciplined but lacking skill or flair. Hodgson will come out of it with credit and he deserves to. Looking at the England squad we had to play the way we did, we're in a period of transition with a weaker generation of players than the previous one and injuries throughout the team. We were a penalty shootout away from the semis. I think the Germans have been overhyped this time around and struggled against Portugal but they will have a major advantage with 2 days' extra rest, not to mention the extra time the Italians played. Credit to Italy, the better team went through. At least England leave with their heads held high and have something to build upon for 2014. By then, new players will come through and we should be able to attack it with a stronger squad. We've had just the same type of displays at previous tournaments when Lampard was in the side playing at his supposed peak. It's complete bollocks to think he'd have made any difference now when he's nowhere near the player he was. Don't think he'd have made much difference because we were outplayed across the field. But we lacked any composure in midfield which was actually my point. It maybe your point but it's not what you wrote. Yes it is, you've even highlighted it in bold. We needed someone else in midfield, a cool head capable of a defence splitting pass, switching the play quickly or striking from distance. Pirlo was the difference in that respect but I'm not saying Lampard would have filled that gap. It was merely another injury loss England didn't need in a tough game and Hodgson made best of what he had available. We rode our luck a bit and fought hard but we just didn't have the quality espescially in midfield. Which you said was Lampard ffs. "We missed his presence"...He "ticks the boxes" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Think that's part of the picture as well. Some of the heart has gone out of the domestic game and has been replaced by hair gel and alice bands ( I wonder where they came from??) Things change and we're generally a load of lazy bastards now. I played most of my football on school fields but you can't do that now because most fields have massive fences up to keep kids off them, it's crazy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Class interviews on SSN. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Kids these days seem to be more interested in playing computer football then the real thing. When I was a kid we'd spend most evenings outside kicking a ball around because we had nothing else to do, now kids just want to go into a room and play football on a computer against mates who want to do the same thing. I'm not saying our coaching isn't a fault but I do think the pool of young players is smaller than it used to be. we are going to sound like a pair of old farts here like but when they do play it's 'organised', club games, club training. you rarely see a large, get some mates together type game on a field now, not that this on its own would right things but it seems the desire to play is being lost. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 FWIW, talking about penalties http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/9238/63227270.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ohmelads Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Thing Hodgson and England made the most of an extremely messy buildup to the tournament. Whatever people say about Lampard, and a lot of bollocks has been said down the years by tabloid journos, he's a massive danger in the right areas, he can play people in and his presence was missed. Gerrard did his best but we needed someone else in midfield, a cool head capable of a defence splitting pass, switching the play quickly or striking from distance and Lampard ticks those boxes. Parker is a pretty limited player but he does what he's told and gives his all. It typified England's performance here and throughout the tournament - disciplined but lacking skill or flair. Hodgson will come out of it with credit and he deserves to. Looking at the England squad we had to play the way we did, we're in a period of transition with a weaker generation of players than the previous one and injuries throughout the team. We were a penalty shootout away from the semis. I think the Germans have been overhyped this time around and struggled against Portugal but they will have a major advantage with 2 days' extra rest, not to mention the extra time the Italians played. Credit to Italy, the better team went through. At least England leave with their heads held high and have something to build upon for 2014. By then, new players will come through and we should be able to attack it with a stronger squad. We've had just the same type of displays at previous tournaments when Lampard was in the side playing at his supposed peak. It's complete bollocks to think he'd have made any difference now when he's nowhere near the player he was. Don't think he'd have made much difference because we were outplayed across the field. But we lacked any composure in midfield which was actually my point. It maybe your point but it's not what you wrote. Yes it is, you've even highlighted it in bold. We needed someone else in midfield, a cool head capable of a defence splitting pass, switching the play quickly or striking from distance. Pirlo was the difference in that respect but I'm not saying Lampard would have filled that gap. It was merely another injury loss England didn't need in a tough game and Hodgson made best of what he had available. We rode our luck a bit and fought hard but we just didn't have the quality espescially in midfield. Which you said was Lampard ffs. "We missed his presence"...He "ticks the boxes" Hang on what's your point exactly? I don't think Lampard's the player he was, nor do I think he'd have made much of a difference in this match in all honesty. But I do think we missed him, we were desperate for a cool head in possession, someone with the technique to control a ball in tight space, take shots from distance and spray the ball out wide and for all his flaws, Lampard does that well. We could have done with Barry ahead of Henderson as well. My point was obvious, and has been repeated twice now. I can't be arsed repeating it again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 FWIW, talking about penalties http://img16.imageshack.us/img16/9238/63227270.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Thing Hodgson and England made the most of an extremely messy buildup to the tournament. Whatever people say about Lampard, and a lot of bollocks has been said down the years by tabloid journos, he's a massive danger in the right areas, he can play people in and his presence was missed. Gerrard did his best but we needed someone else in midfield, a cool head capable of a defence splitting pass, switching the play quickly or striking from distance and Lampard ticks those boxes. Parker is a pretty limited player but he does what he's told and gives his all. It typified England's performance here and throughout the tournament - disciplined but lacking skill or flair. Hodgson will come out of it with credit and he deserves to. Looking at the England squad we had to play the way we did, we're in a period of transition with a weaker generation of players than the previous one and injuries throughout the team. We were a penalty shootout away from the semis. I think the Germans have been overhyped this time around and struggled against Portugal but they will have a major advantage with 2 days' extra rest, not to mention the extra time the Italians played. Credit to Italy, the better team went through. At least England leave with their heads held high and have something to build upon for 2014. By then, new players will come through and we should be able to attack it with a stronger squad. We've had just the same type of displays at previous tournaments when Lampard was in the side playing at his supposed peak. It's complete bollocks to think he'd have made any difference now when he's nowhere near the player he was. Don't think he'd have made much difference because we were outplayed across the field. But we lacked any composure in midfield which was actually my point. It maybe your point but it's not what you wrote. Yes it is, you've even highlighted it in bold. We needed someone else in midfield, a cool head capable of a defence splitting pass, switching the play quickly or striking from distance. Pirlo was the difference in that respect but I'm not saying Lampard would have filled that gap. It was merely another injury loss England didn't need in a tough game and Hodgson made best of what he had available. We rode our luck a bit and fought hard but we just didn't have the quality espescially in midfield. Which you said was Lampard ffs. "We missed his presence"...He "ticks the boxes" tbf he'd have been a better option off the bench than Henderson Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 @SamWallaceIndy: Joe Hart completed more passes (45) than any other England player tonight. Depressing says it all really Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Joe Hart of all players worthy of a mention? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 look at the one against Reading. He's not even looking at the ball. The Ashley's can only fucking dream. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 we are going to sound like a pair of old farts here like but when they do play it's 'organised', club games, club training. you rarely see a large, get some mates together type game on a field now, not that this on its own would right things but it seems the desire to play is being lost. I had a couple of mates who went on to become professional footballers, both learned to play on a field with a disorganised kick-about, it's as if we coach the game out of players now, rather than into them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chicago_shearer Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Having the most enjoyable, profitable and televised league in the world but wondering if it would be terribly impolite to ask the foreign club owners to do more to encourage youth development in the country they profit from. Very English. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Too late to look at the whole article so will just pick a point, he mentions the lack of English keepers in the Premier League. The champions have an English keeper. Scott Carson, Chris Kirkland, Paul Robinson and Rob Green have all played in the league in the last couple of years. If a keeper is that good I am sure he can displace those, let alone some of the weaker non-English keepers in this league and even the Championship. We took a keeper playing in league 2 and according to Wiki (I know) only played 12 games ahead of a young English keeper playing for the Scottish champions. If there were good young English keepers slipping through the big clubs or already playing in lower leagues I am sure they would work their way up to prominence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 look at the one against Reading. He's not even looking at the ball. The Ashley's can only fucking dream. Still think the one in the 5-1 was the best. Side fucking netting. I watched the shootout against Partizan the other day, he's the only one who nailed his penno. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 look at the one against Reading. He's not even looking at the ball. The Ashley's can only f***ing dream. Still think the one in the 5-1 was the best. Side f***ing netting. I watched the shootout against Partizan the other day, he's the only one who nailed his penno. its 'cos he's cool as fuck. If he'd been in the squad tonight he would have stopped, swapped hats 10 times then sent Buffon the wrong way. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 I hope someone tells Balotelli that Shearer said he's won nowt, so he can pay him a visit and compare medals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 I hope someone tells Ballotelli that Shearer said he's won nowt, so he can pay him a visit and compare medals. Cringeworthy comment that one. You can tell he realised after he said it anarl. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayson Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Ameobi walks around lazily like he could careless, Balo takes half a year when he needs to hurry his finish. Both ignore pressure, penalties are made for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted June 25, 2012 Share Posted June 25, 2012 Ameobi walks around lazily like he could careless, Balo takes half a year when he needs to hurry his finish. Both ignore pressure, penalties are made for them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts