The Prophet Posted June 28, 2009 Share Posted June 28, 2009 A lot of people will see this as a no brainer. Would you rather be in City's position spending your way to the top, buying the best players in the buisness and in the eyes of some ruining the game. Throwing massive amounts of money at players will provide money and long term success but what happens if it all goes wrong, what if the backer loses interest or in the case of poor Gretna ends up on his death bed? Or would you rather be in our current position searching for an honest owner, looking to re-structure the foundations of the club and essentially provide long term success and stability? We're in a lower division, we're ownerless, we're managerless but surely once the owner of the club is in place for the long term things will begin to turn around at some stage. Personally for me it is a no brainer. I'd rather be up there with the riches, the success and the big league. Some people may feel differently but the only way to compete at the top is to spend silly money like Chelsea and Man City. I'd have no problem with it in the slightest especially compared to the situation we currently find ourselves in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!Register a new account
Already have an account? Sign in here.Sign In Now