2sheds Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Exactly Prophet. Credit where credits due especially considering the materials he has at his disposal and the circumstances he's working under. To think he could get us promoted just for Shearer to stroll in and have another go does not make sense and is a poor way to treat anyone doing such a good job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frazzle Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Exactly Prophet. Credit where credits due especially considering the materials he has at his disposal and the circumstances he's working under. To think he could get us promoted just for Shearer to stroll in and have another go does not make sense and is a poor way to treat anyone doing such a good job. You're right, Hughton should be given a four year contract. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
2sheds Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Exactly Prophet. Credit where credits due especially considering the materials he has at his disposal and the circumstances he's working under. To think he could get us promoted just for Shearer to stroll in and have another go does not make sense and is a poor way to treat anyone doing such a good job. You're right, Hughton should be given a four year contract. 4 years? WTF? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Will people respect the man a little more now? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Will people respect the man a little more now? For getting the starting line-up wrong? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
EthiGeordie Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Will people respect the man a little more now? For getting the starting line-up wrong? Common Dave he is spot on the subs lus he have no other alternatives cause Marlon and Jonas didn't play whole game for quite a while now.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Two defensive line-ups at home on the bounce now. For no real reason. We'd just gone away and pummeled four past the keeper... there was no real reason to have two grafters in the midfield in Butt and Smith. Interesting to see what he does on Saturday but i hope he fucking goes for it this time. Bristol haven't won away from home. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayson Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Hard to tell much from just radio, but did seem more like a lack of performance rather than any major errors. Butt playing doesnt help, Geremi would probably get a game over him for most. Thats about it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 How difficult is it to stand in a dressing room with Butt and tell him that he's not playing because he's shit? Hardest thing in the world apparently. On the left in a diamond, fucking hell Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 For once, it wasn't his fault today. Made the right changes when I would have done the same. Starting line-up was a question mark, but it worked at Ipswich so... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 For once, it wasn't his fault today. Made the right changes when I would have done the same. Starting line-up was a question mark, but it worked at Ipswich so... it worked because Nolan was on fire. Despite Ipswich's woeful defence the two strikers didn't really trouble and Butt was his usual woeful self. The starting line-up tonight was horribly wrong and in truth they battered us for the first 20 minutes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 For once, it wasn't his fault today. Made the right changes when I would have done the same. Starting line-up was a question mark, but it worked at Ipswich so... it worked because Nolan was on fire. Despite Ipswich's woeful defence the two strikers didn't really trouble and Butt was his usual woeful self. The starting line-up tonight was horribly wrong and in truth they battered us for the first 20 minutes What do you expect Hughton to do? I know we were average bar that 5 minute period last Saturday, but we still won comfortably at 4-0. "I know we won comfortably at Ipswich lads, but I'm going to completely change it around tonight" - it just doesn't make sense to do it. Of course it wasn't the right line-up, but he had no real choice IYAM. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 the whole 'don't change a winning team' philosophy is rubbish tbh. Especially when you're playing 2 games in just over 3 days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 the whole 'don't change a winning team' philosophy is rubbish tbh. Especially when you're playing 2 games in just over 3 days. I don't particularly agree with it, but most managers do. Hughton was in a lose-lose situation, if he'd changed the team and shape and we'd had the same result, most would have blamed it on that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 For once, it wasn't his fault today. Made the right changes when I would have done the same. Starting line-up was a question mark, but it worked at Ipswich so... it worked because Nolan was on fire. Despite Ipswich's woeful defence the two strikers didn't really trouble and Butt was his usual woeful self. The starting line-up tonight was horribly wrong and in truth they battered us for the first 20 minutes The result against Ipswich did hide a few sins though. We haven't actually played very good football for a lot of the season but we have defended well and picked up the points. The midfield is still shite as it was last season which is why we end up playing long ball crap. At least Hughes is recognising that Butt is a liability now and subbing him early. Hopefully that means he will not be starting on Saturday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Hughes? If he though Butt was a liability he wouldn't be starting him twice in 3 days Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 Hughes? If he though Butt was a liability he wouldn't be starting him twice in 3 days Hughton (or Hughesy for short!) is basically a coach so he still finds it difficult to leave Butt out of the starting line up. At least he took him off early though, let's be thankful for small mercies. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thespence Posted September 30, 2009 Share Posted September 30, 2009 We play more long balls with a fella who played in a good footballing Spurs side than we did when we had the x-Wimbledon manager in charge. PLEASE NOTE THIS DOES NOT MEAN I WANT JFK BACK.............I AM JUST SAYING!!!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted October 1, 2009 Share Posted October 1, 2009 We play more long balls with a fella who played in a good footballing Spurs side than we did when we had the x-Wimbledon manager in charge. PLEASE NOTE THIS DOES NOT MEAN I WANT JFK BACK.............I AM JUST SAYING!!!! What makes me laugh is that he keeps coming out after the games and saying we didn't keep the ball as well as we would have liked. Ummm...well who's fault is that Chris? Keegan's side passed the ball on the deck because they were instructed to. If we are lumping the ball long when we aren't supposed to then it doesn't say much for the coaching standards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest toonlass Posted October 3, 2009 Share Posted October 3, 2009 manager of the month again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted October 3, 2009 Share Posted October 3, 2009 manager of the month again Got to admire the guy, doing a hell of a job in the circumstances. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted October 3, 2009 Share Posted October 3, 2009 Well deserved. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest prestonj1989 Posted October 3, 2009 Share Posted October 3, 2009 Did Nolan get the player of the month? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted October 3, 2009 Share Posted October 3, 2009 Nah Leon Best got it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now