Jump to content

Danny Simpson (now retired)


Recommended Posts

If Simpson isn't removed from the side when Colo is fit, Pardew wants shooting.

 

???

 

I don't really think Perch is clearly better. Marginally on recent form maybe.

 

Perch is comfortably a better footballer than Simpson and he's shown it for the last year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Rey Mysterio

If Simpson isn't removed from the side when Colo is fit, Pardew wants shooting.

 

???

 

I don't really think Perch is clearly better. Marginally on recent form maybe.

 

To me it's quite obvious Perch is the much better option until we sign a quality RB. The gulf in class when he played there at the end of last season whilst Simpson was injured was a breath of fresh air.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Danny Simpson have shown over a larger period now that he's utter average/prone to be shit. Santon is quite new to Premier League, and also only 21. I guess it's not fair to only criticize the one, but you catch my drift.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Simpson isn't removed from the side when Colo is fit, Pardew wants shooting.

 

???

 

I don't really think Perch is clearly better. Marginally on recent form maybe.

 

Perch is comfortably a better footballer than Simpson and he's shown it for the last year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Simpson isn't removed from the side when Colo is fit, Pardew wants shooting.

 

???

 

I don't really think Perch is clearly better. Marginally on recent form maybe.

 

Perch is comfortably a better footballer than Simpson and he's shown it for the last year.

Yep
Link to post
Share on other sites

Really hope we buy Debuchy, anyway. Would improve us a lot, even from the little I've seen of him.

 

Tbh any fullback that is comfortable in possession and can contribute to the attack would improve us a lot, not just Debuchy.

 

Although Debuchy is clearly my first choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Whey, we'll have to agree to disagree. Perch right now is playing brilliantly, and he looks to have improved a lot, but I'm still not sure he's really a better fullback than Simpson. Like I say, it's marginal rather than clear.

 

Perch is much more comfortable on the ball. He would fit in better than Simpson for what we are trying to do now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Santon really is young and been out for the most part after his breakthrough season. People slag it off like Lennon was a shit winger wich he by any means is not. Lennon is actually quite good at getting crosses in. But in all Santon has to play every week to gain experience to handle players like that. Simpson just isn't in par technically to give that extra up field that we need.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perch is a better footballer, that's without question. That does not mean to say he's a better RB. Perch is verasatile player and does a good job in filling in postions when needed. If Perch is better than Simpson i'm pretty confident Pardew would have found this out last year and dropped Simpson for Perch. Until he does, i'm all for Simpson at Rb till we sign someone with more quality.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simpson wasn't that bad on Saturday, some of the criticism is way over the top.

 

He is generally a poor footballer and nowhere near good enough for where we want to be though, if we don't buy a fullback before the end of the window it'll be a massive balls up.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Perch plays comfortably well in each position hes played in so far. Of course he is a better RB. He has any defensive qualitities that Simpson possesses and none of the frailties in terms of confidence on the ball. I've no qualms in calling that. Simpson had a decent enough game tbh on Saturday despite some silly moments but Perch just oozes calm and confidence whereever hes put....aside from positional sense and intelligent passing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simpson is pretty clearly the victim of confirmation bias in that people only watch for the mistakes he makes. And then those mistakes are magnified because of their opinion of him. Rarely does he get credit for the positive things he does (which he does do).

 

He is poor. Its the lack of pace and absolute zero recovery when beaten by his man. You are right about him doing good things.

Hitler did good stuff to, gets rather overlooked somewhat though.

 

:jones:

 

That analogy is a combination of :serious: and :facepalm:

 

Mind-numbingly awful.

 

Good comparison imo.

 

Simpson will never be Time Magazine's man of the year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simpson is pretty clearly the victim of confirmation bias in that people only watch for the mistakes he makes. And then those mistakes are magnified because of their opinion of him. Rarely does he get credit for the positive things he does (which he does do).

 

He is poor. Its the lack of pace and absolute zero recovery when beaten by his man. You are right about him doing good things.

Hitler did good stuff to, gets rather overlooked somewhat though.

 

:jones:

 

That analogy is a combination of :serious: and :facepalm:

 

Mind-numbingly awful.

 

Good comparison imo.

 

Simpson will never be Time Magazine's man of the year.

 

nor is he worth making a thousand narrratives and docs about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No idea why so much study of nazism and ww2 still goes on, such an industry for academics on a subject that has been studied to death, what more could there possibly to learn? Sorry history grad here...

 

and to relate it to simpson...erm.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

No idea why so much study of nazism and ww2 still goes on, such an industry for academics on a subject that has been studied to death, what more could there possibly to learn? Sorry history grad here...

 

and to relate it to simpson...erm.

 

Oh you know, did some good things and some bad things  :laugh:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simpson gets way too much stick on here than he should. I'd go as far as saying that Simpson is one of the better right full backs we've had in recent years, especially considering we've had the likes of Carr, Ramage and Edgar playing there, but what does make Simpson stand out, is that he blatantly isnt as good as a footballer as the rest of the team and is the weak link.

 

Good full backs are a 'must' for what we're aiming for. They turn a good side into a top side. A quality right back who has the attacking quality Simpson lacks and the improvement of Santon would see us come on leaps and bounds as a side I reckon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...