Happy Face Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 NEWCASTLE owner Mike Ashley and managing director Derek Llambias have been busy early on in the transfer window . . . in Las Vegas. While United manager Chris Hughton started his bid to sign the players to boost the club’s priceless promotion campaign, his bosses flew to the States at the start of the week. Hughton has been promised money to spend in January, but will have needed to confer with Newcastle’s top brass on whether to up his bid for Leeds striker Jermaine Beckford. The purpose of Ashley and Llambias’ trip to the world’s gaming capital is unknown, although Llambias is a former boss of now-closed London casino 50 St James and once managed a similar club in Vegas. While the duo were away, the Newcastle United Supporters’ Trust’s attempt to buy Ashley out picked up pace, with Newcastle City Council revealing it will consider giving the fans’ bid its official backing. Newcastle’s search for new firepower is becoming ever more urgent as the Championship chasing pack hunt them down. And the Sunday Sun understands that promotion rivals West Brom are lining up a bid for Leicester City hotshot Matty Fryatt. http://www.sundaysun.co.uk/sport/newcastle-utd/newcastle-utd-news/2010/01/10/ashley-and-llambias-head-off-to-las-vegas-79310-25565574/ I'm sorry I don't follow the US league too closely, but I'm pretty sure Vegas isn't a hotbed of young football talent. Whether the trip is business or pleasure it once again shows that the managing director and owner of our club do not see us as their priority and continue only to say what they want us (and the manager) to hear, but fail miserably every time it comes to taking action to make good on those promises. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 It's just a holiday; NUFC means nothing to them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Thought they would have email and phones in Vegas by now ? Still, if this implies that they won't be able to sanction any deals then nobody should be leaving which has to be good. Surprised Chelsea ever buy ANYONE the amount of time Abramovic spends on his yacht. Maybe he's got a phone though ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Thought they would have email and phones in Vegas by now ? Still, if this implies that they won't be able to sanction any deals then nobody should be leaving which has to be good. Surprised Chelsea ever buy ANYONE the amount of time Abramovic spends on his yacht. Maybe he's got a phone though ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Hope they don't lose the transfer kitty on the slots... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Do you lot want new players in or not? The £1.5mill we had for Beckford was the lot, it was put on the wheel last night, he has to raise funds somehow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Thought they would have email and phones in Vegas by now ? Still, if this implies that they won't be able to sanction any deals then nobody should be leaving which has to be good. Surprised Chelsea ever buy ANYONE the amount of time Abramovic spends on his yacht. Maybe he's got a phone though ? I couldn't give a fuck if Ashley is away, all he has to do is say yes or no. I'd have thought Llambias should be around to haggle and for contract negotiations though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Thought they would have email and phones in Vegas by now ? Still, if this implies that they won't be able to sanction any deals then nobody should be leaving which has to be good. Surprised Chelsea ever buy ANYONE the amount of time Abramovic spends on his yacht. Maybe he's got a phone though ? I couldn't give a f*** if Ashley is away, all he has to do is say yes or no. I'd have thought Llambias should be around to haggle and for contract negotiations though. Just another crap article written by a woeful lazy journalist who can't be bothered to find a real story. Shouldn't worry about it as it will make zero difference to who we end up buying or selling whether they're in Las Vegas, Longbenton or Lima. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Thought they would have email and phones in Vegas by now ? Still, if this implies that they won't be able to sanction any deals then nobody should be leaving which has to be good. Surprised Chelsea ever buy ANYONE the amount of time Abramovic spends on his yacht. Maybe he's got a phone though ? I couldn't give a f*** if Ashley is away, all he has to do is say yes or no. I'd have thought Llambias should be around to haggle and for contract negotiations though. Just another crap article written by a woeful lazy journalist who can't be bothered to find a real story. Shouldn't worry about it as it will make zero difference to who we end up buying or selling whether they're in Las Vegas, Longbenton or Lima. It won't make a difference only because we weren't going to sign anyone anyway. The point is they spout bollocks about giving the manager their full backing and doing everything in their power to get the players he wants....and when Beckford's put in a transfer request they fuck off to Vegas. What happens if Leeds decided to take the offer on the table. Beckford drives up for talks, gets hoyed on a teleconference call by the receptionist and gets a pissed up Llambias using his mobile at a Tom Jones show going "I fucking love you Beckham! hic! We'll give you £2,000 a week or fuck off!" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I thought we wanted the manager to be in charge of transfers anyway? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macca888 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Isnt the bloke Charnley in charge of contracts and admin at the club now? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I thought we wanted the manager to be in charge of transfers anyway? Completley different matter tbh. Who would want hughton doing contracts? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobby_solano Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Isnt the bloke Charnley in charge of contracts and admin at the club now? hopefully i wonder if that statement hughton made about assuring the fans we'd be trying to sign players was put out to try to diffuse fat mike and decca's bender in vegas?[ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I thought we wanted the manager to be in charge of transfers anyway? Maybe we should appoint a Director of Football Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I thought we wanted the manager to be in charge of transfers anyway? Completley different matter tbh. Who would want hughton doing contracts? Fair point I suppose, although I imagine Ashley and Llambias aren't going to be in Vegas permanently. Don't know anything about Charnley, what's his role? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I thought we wanted the manager to be in charge of transfers anyway? Maybe we should appoint a Director of Football Now we're talking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I thought we wanted the manager to be in charge of transfers anyway? Completley different matter tbh. Who would want hughton doing contracts? Fair point I suppose, although I imagine Ashley and Llambias aren't going to be in Vegas permanently. Of course not. But there's only 4 months of the year when they can do ANYTHING to help the first team. The other 8 months it's down to Hughton and his playing staff. Even in the Summer there's a good month or two when no deals are being done. Basically, Llambias only has August and January in which to support his manager. It would be nice if he could dedicate one sixth of his working year to the club when it needs him. Of course he chooses not to. He just spends the last day of the window at the training ground telling SSN he's doing all he can working around the clock when he's spent the previous month doing sweet FA. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I hear us signing Rooney rsets on Ashley rolling a pair 6's Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PCW1983 Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 [flash=200,200] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 I thought we wanted the manager to be in charge of transfers anyway? Completley different matter tbh. Who would want hughton doing contracts? Fair point I suppose, although I imagine Ashley and Llambias aren't going to be in Vegas permanently. Of course not. But there's only 4 months of the year when they can do ANYTHING to help the first team. The other 8 months it's down to Hughton and his playing staff. Even in the Summer there's a good month or two when no deals are being done. Basically, Llambias only has August and January in which to support his manager. It would be nice if he could dedicate one sixth of his working year to the club when it needs him. Of course he chooses not to. He just spends the last day of the window at the training ground telling SSN he's doing all he can working around the clock when he's spent the previous month doing sweet FA. I'm with you, if Ashley and Llambias really have anything to do with signings on a day-to-day basis, or actually intend for the club to buy anyone, then they should be available. To be honest though, this could just be a long weekend or anything, and they could still be available on the phone. I just don't think it's a massive deal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shayno Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 No, but it's where the girls, drugs and fatty foods are. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 To be honest though, this could just be a long weekend or anything, and they could still be available on the phone. I just don't think it's a massive deal. Its all about perception though isnt it. Flying off to Vegas just doesnt give the impression that they are concentrating on the Transfer Window - whether it be rightly or wrongly. Fans, I think, like to know that their top boys are in their offices working on things. MA & DL seem incapable of avoiding this kind of thing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 Fat bastards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 To be honest though, this could just be a long weekend or anything, and they could still be available on the phone. I just don't think it's a massive deal. Its all about perception though isnt it. Flying off to Vegas just doesnt give the impression that they are concentrating on the Transfer Window - whether it be rightly or wrongly. Fans, I think, like to know that their top boys are in their offices working on things. MA & DL seem incapable of avoiding this kind of thing. It's not that they are incapable of avoiding it, it's that we seem to be uniquely obsessed enough with all things negative for the rags to warrent bringing up shit nothing stories like this about us to fret over. It should in my opinion be relegated to the 'media hates us' thread, not get unnecessarily wound up by. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Face Posted January 11, 2010 Share Posted January 11, 2010 To be honest though, this could just be a long weekend or anything, and they could still be available on the phone. I just don't think it's a massive deal. Its all about perception though isnt it. Flying off to Vegas just doesnt give the impression that they are concentrating on the Transfer Window - whether it be rightly or wrongly. Fans, I think, like to know that their top boys are in their offices working on things. MA & DL seem incapable of avoiding this kind of thing. It's not that they are incapable of avoiding it, it's that we seem to be obsessed enough with all things negative for the rags to warrent bringing up shit nothing stories like this that by rights should be relegated to the 'media hates us' thread. I'm shocked it's only the Sunday Sun that's picked up on it because I think it's a fucking disgrace. If we have a major release at work, I tend not to use my annual leave around that time because it's a bit of a busy period and I want to be available and at my best. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now