Martin Lol Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 What? He's only been charged as it stands, which he's denied. He hasn't actually been banned yet so there isn't anything to appeal. The charge is effectively the ban, which he can either accept or deny - which he has - running the possible risk of a 4 match ban. It doesn't work like that as far as I know. If they find him guilty tomorrow, he then has the option of appealing the ban handed out to him, which is when the ban can be extended. Wullie has got it right, the charge attracts a 3 match ban, the player can accept the ban or contest it. If he contests it and is found guilty, the FA may or may not make it a 4 match ban for a 'frivolous appeal'. If the ban is increased to 4 matches, the player can appeal against the addition of the extra match ban. If that appeal is unsuccessful, the ban could be further increased to 5 matches. There is no right to appeal after that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spider Jerusalem Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 I'd be using video footage of the foul on Williamson by Bedtner and be saying that he was just attempting what another alleged top class referee from this league deemed to be a legal challenge, and clashed heads accidentally. To be honest though, Elmander was about as believable as that stupid twat that's currently on the news with her feinting spurts, lying down 'knocked out' to get the ref's or media's attention. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 confirmed 3 match ban http://www.nufc.co.uk/articles/20101124/williamson-decision-upheld_2281670_2229327 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 how did they prove it was a deliberate headbutt yet couldnt prove that Huddlestone stamped on that player Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Willo is an NUFC player whilst Huddlecunt is a Spurs player. That's how. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 how did they prove it was a deliberate headbutt yet couldnt prove that Huddlestone stamped on that player because the fa suck up to the "important clubs" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 how did they prove it was a deliberate headbutt yet couldnt prove that Huddlestone stamped on that player Because Willos was and because they favor bigger teams and national team players? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Lol Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Surprised it wasn't judged as a frivolous appeal tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
quayside Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 They have handed out bans to big club players before - didn't Rio get a 4 match ban (including 1 for a frivolous appeal) so I'm not sure the favouring big clubs argument has much to it. The Huddlestone decision is more likely to be down to incompetence tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Martin Lol Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 They have handed out bans to big club players before - didn't Rio get a 4 match ban (including 1 for a frivolous appeal) so I'm not sure the favouring big clubs argument has much to it. The Huddlestone decision is more likely to be down to incompetence tbh. Quite possibly. Hudd still maintains that it was accidental but there's no reason he couldn't have been putting that defence to an FA disciplinary committee panel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 They don't miss a trick when it comes to us. I'm still wondering why Dempsey wasn't charged for elbowing Bosingwa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 No point in lashing out with your hands, elbows or head, best way is to tackle someone and break their legs. This season has proven that, hopefully we'll learn from this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Am I the only one who doesn't care that he's suspended? He's worse than Campbell and Taylor. My only concern is that if one these two are nowhere near fit and Perch has to start. Then Ill be seriously worried. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Am I the only one who doesn't care that he's suspended? He's worse than Campbell and Taylor. My only concern is that if one these two are nowhere near fit and Perch has to start. Then Ill be seriously worried. http://www.dailyhaggis.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/o_rly.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Am I the only one who doesn't care that he's suspended? He's worse than Campbell and Taylor. My only concern is that if one these two are nowhere near fit and Perch has to start. Then Ill be seriously worried. http://www.dailyhaggis.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/o_rly.jpg Oh really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Based on what? I'm curious. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisMcQuillan Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 I reckon Kadar would be ahead of Perch in the order of things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Based on what? I'm curious. Based on the way they've played last time I've seen them. Campbell has been good every time he has come on and Taylor was good last time he played. Williamson on the other hand has been good but he gets lucky, and I've said this a long time and at the end he didn't get lucky and got what he deserved. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 In the most part Willamson and Coloccini have been impeccable since they were put together last year and a major part of our promotion. This year i have yet to see either of them make a Bramble esq error, there have been a few minor slip-up's but nothing more than you would suspect from a mid-table side. They have also dealt with some good teams too. The Bolton game was a poor team performance all round and i suspect the lack of defensive cover and inability to keep the ball had alot to do with the result, even if Colo and Williamson had poor individual games. There are still huge question marks over whether Sol is fit enough to play in a premiership defence or whether Stevie Taylor is capable of stringing a few games (let alone decent ones) together. Therefore Coloccini and Williamson will be a huge miss. I reckon in three games time we will desperate for them to return. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 Based on what? I'm curious. Based on the way they've played last time I've seen them. Campbell has been good every time he has come on and Taylor was good last time he played. Williamson on the other hand has been good but he gets lucky, and I've said this a long time and at the end he didn't get lucky and got what he deserved. Agree Campbell has looked good in the very limited amount of appearances he's made, its impossible judge if 'he gets lucky' as you claim Williamson does. People keep referring to his appearances for Arsenal last season but it's difficult to judge given he had much, much better midfield in front of him. As for Taylor it's difficult to know if he's matured while he's been injured but beforehand he was the same rash impulsive player we've had on the books for years. Don't get me wrong both have their qualities but it remains to be seen just how good they are at this present time. As for Williamson I'm not sure how he gets lucky. He's very limited on the ball but to me he's solid if not unspectacular Premier League centre back. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 In the most part Willamson and Coloccini have been impeccable since they were put together last year and a major part of our promotion. This year i have yet to see either of them make a Bramble esq error, there have been a few minor slip-up's but nothing more than you would suspect from a mid-table side. They have also dealt with some good teams too. The Bolton game was a poor team performance all round and i suspect the lack of defensive cover and inability to keep the ball had alot to do with the result, even if Colo and Williamson had poor individual games. There are still huge question marks over whether Sol is fit enough to play in a premiership defence or whether Stevie Taylor is capable of stringing a few games (let alone decent ones) together. Therefore Coloccini and Williamson will be a huge miss. I reckon in three games time we will desperate for them to return. They've shipped 20 goals in 14 games this season? Williamson 3 more at Chelsea. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 And 4 more against Arsenal. There's room for improvement, certainly. I'm amazed we've not seen Campbell partner Colo at some point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 In the most part Willamson and Coloccini have been impeccable since they were put together last year and a major part of our promotion. This year i have yet to see either of them make a Bramble esq error, there have been a few minor slip-up's but nothing more than you would suspect from a mid-table side. They have also dealt with some good teams too. The Bolton game was a poor team performance all round and i suspect the lack of defensive cover and inability to keep the ball had alot to do with the result, even if Colo and Williamson had poor individual games. There are still huge question marks over whether Sol is fit enough to play in a premiership defence or whether Stevie Taylor is capable of stringing a few games (let alone decent ones) together. Therefore Coloccini and Williamson will be a huge miss. I reckon in three games time we will desperate for them to return. They've shipped 20 goals in 14 games this season? Williamson 3 more at Chelsea. Hardly a million miles from the teams around us though is it? Had we not shipped five against Bolton we would be almost identical with the likes of Bolton, Stoke, Spurs etc (goals conceded wise). Which in the context of where we were when those two were put together, is pretty decent. Don't get me wrong, i want us to improve but those two have been steady for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 To throw some sort of paradox into the mix: I hope Campbell is as good as the hope for him is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted November 24, 2010 Share Posted November 24, 2010 I don't see Taylor/Campbell being an improvement on Colo/Willamson, i'd like to be wrong though. I bet Perch fucking plays. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now