Jump to content

Mike Williamson (now unemployed)


Recommended Posts

Aye good point, getting a significantly better player for that position would be pricey.

 

Arsenal have spent a fortune on players who are about as good if not worse.

 

Squillaci and Koscielny were poor buys. Consider Samba, he cost something ridiculous like £500,000.

 

We need a big, physical defender, who can pass the ball on the deck to play alongside Colo imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aye good point, getting a significantly better player for that position would be pricey.

 

Arsenal have spent a fortune on players who are about as good if not worse.

 

Squillaci and Koscielny were poor buys. Consider Samba, he cost something ridiculous like £500,000.

 

We need a big, physical defender, who can pass the ball on the deck to play alongside Colo imo.

 

True, if we could get someone like Samba it would be amazing.

 

But I wouldn't want to replace Williamson with a useless lump just for perceived 'physical presence'. The great thing about Samba is that he's actually good... not just big.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Williamson's fine if our ambition is to hover around mid-table.

 

If we want to progress he should be a squad player.

 

I've got loads of time for him though as he seems a decent, honest pro.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Punk,tdeans whatever,Williamson did not win every aerial ball on Saturday.Far from it.

 

This. Got seriously bailed out several times by Colo and, fair play to the young 'un, Ferguson.

Anyone who says different can't have been at the game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gary Cahill is too expensive, but I'd love him to partner Colo. Big and steady, yet a good footballer who can pass it well.

 

The type of defender we'd ideally have alongside Colo.

 

Not sure about that. I'd rather a 'stop it at all costs' type like Carragher, but a better version, clearly. We have Colo for the composure and quality on the ball.

 

As for Williamson, I echo what Tooj has already said. He's a great pro and a reliable enough defender for where we currently want to be.

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could need a samba-kind of stopper. But it's not the department we need to be prioritize right now. Imo it's more important to buy a rb that could challenge Simpson. Talylor is mainly a cd and not a rb. And Perch is not good enough.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Man of the match with good margins imo. One of the best games I've seen from him. Won every header. Good positioning resulted in him snapping up a couple of through ball attempts. And he was even cool with the ball.. Had some couple of nice passes to central midfield, but also did it simple when necessary. The difference between him and Taylor was noticeable today.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Quite possibly the best of a bad bunch.

 

Not according to madras who thought he was worse than Taylor. :idiot2:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite possibly the best of a bad bunch.

 

Not according to madras who thought he was worse than Taylor. :idiot2:

 

:lol:  He was our best player with a solid margin imo. He looks better for each game...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quite possibly the best of a bad bunch.

 

Not according to madras who thought he was worse than Taylor. :idiot2:

where do i say anyone was worse than anyone else, truth is i thought everyone done ok except for colo, for whom the game seemed to pass by without making any mistakes.

 

think on it, taylor seemed to be marking bent, bent had a very quiet game. most of defending is getting into positions where the oppo doesn't want to pass to the bloke you're marking because the risk of losing the ball is too great due to the player being well marked and that doesn't mean standing on his toes type of defending. someone said something about williamson winning everything in the air....and so he should with it all being down the middle against bent,agbonlahor and young. on the subject of agbonlahor, didn't he get in the gap between centre halves and simpson a few times and was allowed to run on for a while, you'd expect the 'spare' centre half to cover that, we didn't and on one occasion the spare centre half was trying to cover the pass inside allowing him a free shot at goal which harper saved.

 

taylor had a decent game and kept one of the best 'fox in the box' type forwards very quiet, sorry if it wasn't spectacular enough to earn plaudits, unfortunatly for some, good defending has to be spectacular to be recognised.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...