TRon Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 so i take it he is not coming here anymore ? It's all speculation atm, the general consensus is that it might go to Monday before it's settled. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest sicko2ndbest Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 30 pages in 15 hours. This is going to take off like the club sale thread, with just as little happening Is he selling then Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 This board would be a lot more fun if people stopped using it to feed their meglomaniac egos. I fixed your post for you. Not directed specifically at you, but more to all the stupid internet battles going on in the football section. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 This board would be a lot more fun if people stopped using it to feed their meglomaniac egos. I fixed your post for you. Not directed specifically at you, but more to all the stupid internet battles going on in the football section. I agree, too many people on here think that they are ITK, and that we are the only club to provide a future and developement for players like Moses. Face, hardly any of you know what the hell is going on, and that we currently have severe competition for Moses and we cannot assume that we are in pole position. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pie Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 This board would be a lot more fun if someone ever presented a decent arguement as to how i'm wrong instead. That's it Dave, score some more easy points, pathetic. Is he a gutless scumbag? He's right, it's rare anyone ever actually tries to debate with him, they get 2-3 posts in, then call him arrogant, obnoxious, or something similar. I'm not debating if he's arrogant or obnoxious, but at least he quotes facts. I did provide sufficient infomation for him to have a debate. Unfortunately, he chose not to respond. That's because you ended up agreeing with me. Nope, I did ask you to engage your brain though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Is it just me that thinks Moses - 9 looks mint? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Is it just me that thinks Moses - 9 looks mint? As much as your DP. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Moses-10 would be better. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Is it just me that thinks Moses - 9 looks mint? See my earlier post in this thread , we had God in Shearer in the 9 Shirt, then Methuselah in Martins , now Moses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Is it just me that thinks Moses - 9 looks mint? See my earlier post in this thread , we had God in Shearer in the 9 Shirt, then Methuselah in Martins , now Moses. :lol: Ridiculous, man! If anyone is Methuselah it's Geremi anyway. Blame the Cameroonians for once. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
macca888 Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Moses - 10 due to the 10 commandments, maybe? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 Oooh! New thread title, something to keep us interested until more news comes out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 This thread title isn't exciting Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 This thread title isn't exciting I thought he signed, for a half-second there! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 30 pages in 15 hours. 87 by the time he signs for a premiership team. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 This thread title isn't exciting I thought he signed, for a half-second there! That would be "Victor Moses signs on a 3.5 year deal" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 This board would be a lot more fun if someone ever presented a decent arguement as to how i'm wrong instead. That's it Dave, score some more easy points, pathetic. Is he a gutless scumbag? He's right, it's rare anyone ever actually tries to debate with him, they get 2-3 posts in, then call him arrogant, obnoxious, or something similar. I'm not debating if he's arrogant or obnoxious, but at least he quotes facts. I did provide sufficient infomation for him to have a debate. Unfortunately, he chose not to respond. That's because you ended up agreeing with me. Nope, I did ask you to engage your brain though. Because I think we badly need a new striker? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LesPaul Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 This board would be a lot more fun if someone ever presented a decent arguement as to how i'm wrong instead. That's it Dave, score some more easy points, pathetic. Is he a gutless scumbag? He's right, it's rare anyone ever actually tries to debate with him, they get 2-3 posts in, then call him arrogant, obnoxious, or something similar. I'm not debating if he's arrogant or obnoxious, but at least he quotes facts. I did provide sufficient infomation for him to have a debate. Unfortunately, he chose not to respond. That's because you ended up agreeing with me. Nope, I did ask you to engage your brain though. Because I think we badly need a new striker? No, you said we have no strikers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 It's blatantly obvious that isn't what I meant. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 I think we'll sign him for £5m on Monday. Just a hunch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pie Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 This board would be a lot more fun if someone ever presented a decent arguement as to how i'm wrong instead. That's it Dave, score some more easy points, pathetic. Is he a gutless scumbag? He's right, it's rare anyone ever actually tries to debate with him, they get 2-3 posts in, then call him arrogant, obnoxious, or something similar. I'm not debating if he's arrogant or obnoxious, but at least he quotes facts. I did provide sufficient infomation for him to have a debate. Unfortunately, he chose not to respond. That's because you ended up agreeing with me. Nope, I did ask you to engage your brain though. Because I think we badly need a new striker? Nope, because you said that it was "obvious" that that was the position that needed strengthening. Their are other areas that need it too, thus, it can be justifiably claimed that it is not "obvious". To re-cap the points would be a waste of time and energy because I am not sure you have the slightest interest in debate or any opinion but your own. Feel free, however, to look back and consider them. Just try it with an open mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crumpy Gunt Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 I think we'll sign him for £5m on Monday. Just a hunch. Getting Geremi out the door might ease the financial burden. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 I think we'll sign him for £5m on Monday. Just a hunch. Getting Geremi out the door might ease the financial burden. Can't do any harm, can it? £65k a week off the wage bill will free up some cash... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 This board would be a lot more fun if someone ever presented a decent arguement as to how i'm wrong instead. That's it Dave, score some more easy points, pathetic. Is he a gutless scumbag? He's right, it's rare anyone ever actually tries to debate with him, they get 2-3 posts in, then call him arrogant, obnoxious, or something similar. I'm not debating if he's arrogant or obnoxious, but at least he quotes facts. I did provide sufficient infomation for him to have a debate. Unfortunately, he chose not to respond. That's because you ended up agreeing with me. Nope, I did ask you to engage your brain though. Because I think we badly need a new striker? Nope, because you said that it was "obvious" that that was the position that needed strengthening. Their are other areas that need it too, thus, it can be justifiably claimed that it is not "obvious". To re-cap the points would be a waste of time and energy because I am not sure you have the slightest interest in debate or any opinion but your own. Feel free, however, to look back and consider them. Just try it with an open mind. If you think that 9 league goals between our 3 fit strikers doesn't make it our biggest priority, I'm not sure what more I can say. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pie Posted January 29, 2010 Share Posted January 29, 2010 This board would be a lot more fun if someone ever presented a decent arguement as to how i'm wrong instead. That's it Dave, score some more easy points, pathetic. Is he a gutless scumbag? He's right, it's rare anyone ever actually tries to debate with him, they get 2-3 posts in, then call him arrogant, obnoxious, or something similar. I'm not debating if he's arrogant or obnoxious, but at least he quotes facts. I did provide sufficient infomation for him to have a debate. Unfortunately, he chose not to respond. That's because you ended up agreeing with me. Nope, I did ask you to engage your brain though. Because I think we badly need a new striker? Nope, because you said that it was "obvious" that that was the position that needed strengthening. Their are other areas that need it too, thus, it can be justifiably claimed that it is not "obvious". To re-cap the points would be a waste of time and energy because I am not sure you have the slightest interest in debate or any opinion but your own. Feel free, however, to look back and consider them. Just try it with an open mind. If you think that 9 league goals between our 3 fit strikers doesn't make it our biggest priority, I'm not sure what more I can say. As I said, read what I have said then come back with some semblance of sense. I very much doubt you will find me to have said I am entirely happy with our attackers, but I will be intrigued for you to show me where I have. You are thinking too much like a kid with a packet of top trumps and sounding then pontificating like Alan Green. That wasn't a compliment just in case you get confused again. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now