Jump to content

Transfer Deadline Day Jan '10


Recommended Posts

12:35

 

Helen Dalby:

Lots of questions and speculation about the possible return of Darren Ambrose to Newcastle. We have nothing confirmed on this, and the understanding from our sports desk was that Hughton's priority today was to sign a centre forward.

 

Would f***ing love it. Certainly better than Best.

:dowie:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

You lot are f***ing arrogant as f*** at times, give me your point of view then.

 

Ambrose is a midfielder, Best is a striker. We need a striker more. What else you need to know?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You lot are f***ing arrogant as f*** at times, give me your point of view then.

 

Ambrose is a midfielder, Best is a striker. We need a striker more. What else you need to know?

i'm not sure we do need a striker more than a central midfielder.
Link to post
Share on other sites

You lot are f***ing arrogant as f*** at times, give me your point of view then.

 

Ambrose is a midfielder, Best is a striker. We need a striker more. What else you need to know?

 

Then why didnt you say this in the first place insead of the usual " :facepalm: is the only thing I have to put because it clearly describes everything", I know hes a striker and we need a striker, and Id be happier if we got him instead of Best, because even as a midfield player I see him more of a goal threat and much more creative as well, Id rather have him ahead of Smith. Because with him in the side I see us being more dangerous than our usual midfield and a striker as Best leading the attack.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

You lot are f***ing arrogant as f*** at times, give me your point of view then.

 

Ambrose is a midfielder, Best is a striker. We need a striker more. What else you need to know?

i'm not sure we do need a striker more than a central midfielder.

 

Our strikers have scored 5 goals in the last 7 league games of which we won just 1. I would say thats a bigger concern

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

You lot are f***ing arrogant as f*** at times, give me your point of view then.

 

Ambrose is a midfielder, Best is a striker. We need a striker more. What else you need to know?

 

Then why didnt you say this in the first place insead of the usual " :facepalm: is the only thing I have to put because it clearly describes everything", I know hes a striker and we need a striker, and Id be happier if we got him instead of Best, because even as a midfield player I see him more of a goal threat and much more creative as well, Id rather have him ahead of Smith. Because with him in the side I see us being more dangerous than our usual midfield and a striker as Best leading the attack.

 

The facepalm neatly showed you i disagreed.

 

Now you are suggesting a Ambrose/Nolan CM i should have just used one here as well to save the bother of replying tbh

Link to post
Share on other sites

You lot are f***ing arrogant as f*** at times, give me your point of view then.

 

Ambrose is a midfielder, Best is a striker. We need a striker more. What else you need to know?

 

Then why didnt you say this in the first place insead of the usual " :facepalm: is the only thing I have to put because it clearly describes everything", I know hes a striker and we need a striker, and Id be happier if we got him instead of Best, because even as a midfield player I see him more of a goal threat and much more creative as well, Id rather have him ahead of Smith. Because with him in the side I see us being more dangerous than our usual midfield and a striker as Best leading the attack.

 

The facepalm neatly showed you i disagreed.

 

Now you are suggesting a Ambrose/Nolan CM i should have just used one here as well to save the bother of replying tbh

 

Where on earth did I suggest a Ambrose/Nolan midfield

 

Id be content with,

 

Routledge - Guthrie - Ambrose - Jonas

 

        Lovenkrands - Amoebi

 

rather than the usual crap, with Best in the side to compete for a place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Roger Kint

Where on earth did I suggest a Ambrose/Nolan midfield

 

Id be content with,

 

Routledge - Guthrie - Ambrose - Jonas

 

        Lovenkrands - Amoebi

 

rather than the usual crap, with Best in the side to compete for a place.

 

The usual crap which with a decent striker would have us a long way clear by now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Where on earth did I suggest a Ambrose/Nolan midfield

 

Id be content with,

 

Routledge - Guthrie - Ambrose - Jonas

 

        Lovenkrands - Amoebi

 

rather than the usual crap, with Best in the side to compete for a place.

 

The usual crap which with a decent striker would have us a long way clear by now?

 

It got us to where we are now, im not daft and I know that, but lets face it weve been struggling lately and the weakest link in all of our matches this month has been our midfield.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barton will be back soon, a CM isn't the main priority.

 

Barton was dogshit and hardly contributed before he even got injured anyway, I dont even see him as the answer to our problems. Just a fitter, non-goal scoring less defensive version of Nolan and Smith combined, he can be creative and could quite easily be this leagues best midfielder by a mile if he wanted to tho.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barton will be back soon, a CM isn't the main priority.

 

Barton was dogshit and hardly contributed before he even got injured anyway, I dont even see him as the answer to our problems. Just a fitter, non-goal scoring less defensive version of Nolan and Smith combined, he can be creative and could quite easily be this leagues best midfielder by a mile if he wanted to tho.

 

that sentence hurt my head.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barton will be back soon, a CM isn't the main priority.

 

Barton was dogshit and hardly contributed before he even got injured anyway, I dont even see him as the answer to our problems. Just a fitter, non-goal scoring less defensive version of Nolan and Smith combined, he can be creative and could quite easily be this leagues best midfielder by a mile if he wanted to tho.

 

So what you appear to be saying is that Barton isn't like Nolan or Smith

In any way, shape or form

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barton will be back soon, a CM isn't the main priority.

 

Barton was dogshit and hardly contributed before he even got injured anyway, I dont even see him as the answer to our problems. Just a fitter, non-goal scoring less defensive version of Nolan and Smith combined, he can be creative and could quite easily be this leagues best midfielder by a mile if he wanted to tho.

 

that sentence hurt my head.

 

Tough, let me make it simpler for you, I cant see him becoming a major improvement from Nolan and Smith, but certainly will add something new to midfield, his form before he got injured suggested nothing special.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Barton will be back soon, a CM isn't the main priority.

 

Barton was dogshit and hardly contributed before he even got injured anyway, I dont even see him as the answer to our problems. Just a fitter, non-goal scoring less defensive version of Nolan and Smith combined, he can be creative and could quite easily be this leagues best midfielder by a mile if he wanted to tho.

 

So he's not good but he is good, I see what you mean.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...