Fatwax Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 For fielding a weakened team against Man Utd back on December 15th. What a load of bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Which they dont have to pay Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatwax Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 So they've been handed a fine but they don't have to pay the fine? How exactly does that work? My parking fines definitely aren't the same. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 So they've been handed a fine but they don't have to pay the fine? How exactly does that work? My parking fines definitely aren't the same. Depends who gave you the parking fine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 It's suspended so if they do it again, it'll cost them. It's stupid really. What about all those close season games when the title has been wrapped up and the likes Man U don't field their strongest side? Pathetic ruling. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 This has set a precedent which now has to be upheld for all teams. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jayson Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Michael Owen wouldn't even bother bending over to pick that up. Whats the point in fining teams tiny amounts??? Personally i dont think Mick done anything wrong but if you are going to fine a team then send out a message. What a load of shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fatwax Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Yeah but aren't teams also meant to field the strongest possible team in the cups aswell? We all know Arsenals policy when it comes to things like the league cup... the fine stinks of trying to look like the governing body actually has some power so poke the little teams whilst they coil out a terror turd over the billy big bollocks of the leagues. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 I expect a flood of fines for nearly every club in the Premier League now, especially the top four!! Well I don't, obviously. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Icke - Son of God Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Does this mean we're going to get fined every time Nicky Butt makes an appearance? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Does this mean we're going to get fined every time Nicky Butt makes an appearance? That's just the incentive we need TBH. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boosden Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Good. I bet £10 on a draw for that game, Livid when i seen the team Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Good. I bet £10 on a draw for that game, Livid when i seen the team Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Good. I bet £10 on a draw for that game, Livid when i seen the team That was probably what swung the decision. Justice at last! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Too small a punishment. Way too small. Difference between the top teams and the likes of Wolves is that Man Utd and Rsenal's reserves can beat most PL teams, Wolves' reserves cannot. They blatantly threw the game, weakened top "four" teams still expect to win, and do just that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Too small a punishment. Way too small. Difference between the top teams and the likes of Wolves is that Man Utd and Rsenal's reserves can beat most PL teams, Wolves' reserves cannot. They blatantly threw the game, weakened top "four" teams still expect to win, and do just that. exactly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Stephen927 Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 McCarthy might be able to get away with it by saying who can judge what is considered a weakened team. But I'm sure at the time he explained what he was doing.. I can't remember. McCarthy is a cunt. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Too small a punishment. Way too small. Difference between the top teams and the likes of Wolves is that Man Utd and Rsenal's reserves can beat most PL teams, Wolves' reserves cannot. They blatantly threw the game, weakened top "four" teams still expect to win, and do just that. exactly. Just like when Man Utd got beat off West Ham saving them and Liverpool got beat off Fulham effectively saving them? Am sure you will just shrug such team selections off with ease if it ever hampers us Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hakka Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Not sure what I think of this, but put down my initial thoughts. In my opinion, if the club want to field a weakened side for a strategic reason then they should come clean about it before the game and also pay the money back to the Wolves fans who went to the game. Nobody should be conned in to paying money to supporting a team that is purposely undermining itself. It is a bit gay to throw in the towel before even trying, but on the other side of this I can understand that it's almost a certainty in probability terms that they would have been beaten no matter what side they put out. Of course there is always a chance they could have nicked a draw or even a cheeky 0 - 1, but it's more likely they would have lost. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Hmm, strange that. I don't remember Man Ure getting a fine for doing similar against Hull on the last day of last season, or any other time a top 4 club does it, or even something similar in the League Cup. One rule one............and all that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 What a load of bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Amir_9 Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 What a fucking load of tosh, what about Man. United against Hull last game of last season eh? Have they looked at the side they fielded? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ishmael Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Can't understand this at all. It would mean that Liverpool would suffer a fine every time Babel enters the pitch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mowen Posted February 18, 2010 Share Posted February 18, 2010 Pathetic. Should have been a much more severe punishment. I'd fucking love it if they go down by one point now, wonder how McCarthy will justify not trying against a team that got beaten at home by Leeds then. Would serve the wonky nosed cunt right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now