johnnypd Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Nani's lucky he didnt break his leg, he lifts it from the ground/shifts his weight onto the other leg a split second before carragher's impact, and even then he makes a deep cut in his flesh. had his foot been planted he'd be looking at a ben arfa or aaron ramsey type lay off. incredible that such thuggery was only met with a yellow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pilko Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 I've said it before and I'll say it again but nobody in football deserves to take a nasty fall down some stairs more than that arsehole Dalglish. Completely agree. The man is an absolute fucking parasite. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Plus he's usurped the "Wenger fist pumps" as the manager with the most irritating goal celebration. He should be poisoned! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Nani's lucky he didnt break his leg, he lifts it from the ground/shifts his weight onto the other leg a split second before carragher's impact, and even then he makes a deep cut in his flesh. had his foot been planted he'd be looking at a ben arfa or aaron ramsey type lay off. incredible that such thuggery was only met with a yellow. Yeah. It was a pretty clear-cut red card, and the injury could have been a lot worse. On the other hand, if Nani had been wearing shin pads instead of playing cards, it might have just hurt a lot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 If Nani didn't hit the deck every time a player looked him in the eyes, players would be less inclined to want to snap the fucker. Just deserts tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 I'm not sure one win justifies another goal mind! You don't think a 3-1 win, at home to Manchester United, with a Kuyt hattrick, deserves another goal? Then what does? Winning the league? Aye but if you're going to give a goal everytime they beat someone or give one to Parky everytime they lose it would be mental. If they win their next two fair enough but you could argue Parky deserves two for them drawing with Wigan at home and getting hammered off West Ham! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 I'm not sure one win justifies another goal mind! You don't think a 3-1 win, at home to Manchester United, with a Kuyt hattrick, deserves another goal? Then what does? Winning the league? Aye but if you're going to give a goal everytime they beat someone or give one to Parky everytime they lose it would be mental. If they win their next two fair enough but you could argue Parky deserves two for them drawing with Wigan at home and getting hammered off West Ham! But it's not 'everytime they beat someone' - it's the league leaders Manchester United, who they walked all over. It's not like they beat Blackpool 1-0. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Kuyt scored a hatrick Carroll made his debut (and got a header on target woop woop woop) And they beat Man U 3-1 AND they annoyingly sung happy birthday to that cunt Dalglish whilst I was sat cringeing Goal of the season contender tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 I'm not sure one win justifies another goal mind! You don't think a 3-1 win, at home to Manchester United, with a Kuyt hattrick, deserves another goal? Then what does? Winning the league? Aye but if you're going to give a goal everytime they beat someone or give one to Parky everytime they lose it would be mental. If they win their next two fair enough but you could argue Parky deserves two for them drawing with Wigan at home and getting hammered off West Ham! But it's not 'everytime they beat someone' - it's the league leaders Manchester United, who they walked all over. It's not like they beat Blackpool 1-0. I just don't think that Liverpool have done well enough under Dalglish to be beating Parky 4-1. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chubby Jason Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Why such vitriol directed at Dalglish? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Why such vitriol directed at Dalglish? For no other reason that he's an absolute knob and who's fallen completely on his feet twice yet is heralded as a great manager, when he's nothing of the sort. He inherited a superb team at Liverpool that was so much better than anyone else at the time it was ridiculous from Bob Paisley, whilst at Blackburn was allowed to wield immense spending power. And he ruined a great NUFC side and played for a 0-0 draw in a Cup Final. As I say, a total knob. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 I'm not sure one win justifies another goal mind! You don't think a 3-1 win, at home to Manchester United, with a Kuyt hattrick, deserves another goal? Then what does? Winning the league? Aye but if you're going to give a goal everytime they beat someone or give one to Parky everytime they lose it would be mental. If they win their next two fair enough but you could argue Parky deserves two for them drawing with Wigan at home and getting hammered off West Ham! But it's not 'everytime they beat someone' - it's the league leaders Manchester United, who they walked all over. It's not like they beat Blackpool 1-0. I just don't think that Liverpool have done well enough under Dalglish to be beating Parky 4-1. Why not? Hodgson "masterminded" our worst start in half a century and had us flirting with relegation. Dalglish has got us up in the European places. We're averaging nearly twice as many points per match under Kenny, and we look like an entirely different side. Let's face facts: Parky appears to have met his match Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chubby Jason Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Why such vitriol directed at Dalglish? For no other reason that he's an absolute knob and who's fallen completely on his feet twice yet is heralded as a great manager, when he's nothing of the sort. He inherited a superb team at Liverpool that was so much better than anyone else at the time it was ridiculous from Bob Paisley, whilst at Blackburn was allowed to wield immense spending power. And he ruined a great NUFC side and played for a 0-0 draw in a Cup Final. As I say, a total knob. So really it's based on his failure on one cup final over a decade ago. I think he was sacked ridiculously early here. His record speaks for itself. He's a class manager. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Why such vitriol directed at Dalglish? For no other reason that he's an absolute knob and who's fallen completely on his feet twice yet is heralded as a great manager, when he's nothing of the sort. He inherited a superb team at Liverpool that was so much better than anyone else at the time it was ridiculous from Bob Paisley, whilst at Blackburn was allowed to wield immense spending power. And he ruined a great NUFC side and played for a 0-0 draw in a Cup Final. As I say, a total knob. So really it's based on his failure on one cup final over a decade ago. I think he was sacked ridiculously early here. His record speaks for itself. He's a class manager. The only good side he built was due mainly to the fact that Jack Walker could outbid every other club at the time. He started well for us, but it went downhill when he tried to change the side and his time at Celtic was a disaster. His time at Liverpool first time round was very difficult to judge as he inherited the best side in Europe at the time. I think he's one of the luckiest managers in history. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
midds Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 If Nani didn't hit the deck every time a player looked him in the eyes, players would be less inclined to want to snap the fucker. Just deserts tbh. Gobi fucker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest elbee909 Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 If Nani didn't hit the deck every time a player looked him in the eyes, players would be less inclined to want to snap the fucker. Just deserts tbh. Gobi fucker. Mojave a word with yourself man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magorific Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Why such vitriol directed at Dalglish? For no other reason that he's an absolute knob and who's fallen completely on his feet twice yet is heralded as a great manager, when he's nothing of the sort. He inherited a superb team at Liverpool that was so much better than anyone else at the time it was ridiculous from Bob Paisley, whilst at Blackburn was allowed to wield immense spending power. And he ruined a great NUFC side and played for a 0-0 draw in a Cup Final. As I say, a total knob. So really it's based on his failure on one cup final over a decade ago. I think he was sacked ridiculously early here. His record speaks for itself. He's a class manager. You clearly didn't sit through the 1997-98 season. He f**ked us right up. He bought the title with Blackburn when nobody else was spending big money and inherited probably the greatest club side of my lifetime at Liverpool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Why such vitriol directed at Dalglish? For no other reason that he's an absolute knob and who's fallen completely on his feet twice yet is heralded as a great manager, when he's nothing of the sort. He inherited a superb team at Liverpool that was so much better than anyone else at the time it was ridiculous from Bob Paisley, whilst at Blackburn was allowed to wield immense spending power. And he ruined a great NUFC side and played for a 0-0 draw in a Cup Final. As I say, a total knob. So really it's based on his failure on one cup final over a decade ago. I think he was sacked ridiculously early here. His record speaks for itself. He's a class manager. The only good side he built was due mainly to the fact that Jack Walker could outbid every other club at the time. He started well for us, but it went downhill when he tried to change the side and his time at Celtic was a disaster. His time at Liverpool first time round was very difficult to judge as he inherited the best side in Europe at the time. I think he's one of the luckiest managers in history. true at blackburn he really went about it like mourinho at chelsea, bringing in world stars like sherwood, gale, ripley etc. the only player they used finacial muscle to get was shearer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted March 7, 2011 Share Posted March 7, 2011 Flowers? Sutton? Batty? Even the likes of Paul fucking Warhurst! Any decent British player (this was mainly before English sides started scouring Europe on a regular basis) available and Blackburn were sniffing. Blackburn were the classic example of a team buying success. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Flowers? Sutton? Batty? Even the likes of Paul f***ing Warhurst! Any decent British player (this was mainly before English sides started scouring Europe on a regular basis) available and Blackburn were sniffing. Blackburn were the classic example of a team buying success. they bought but those weren't top players, apart from shearer i can't remember them blowing man utd or liverpool out on prices to get anyone. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Chris Sutton was the Andy Carroll of his day, Batty was a league winner, Flowers was one of the top rated English keepers of his era. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 Chris Sutton was the Andy Carroll of his day, Batty was a league winner, Flowers was one of the top rated English keepers of his era. chris sutton was still deciding wheteher he wanted to play up front or centre half. none of the supposed top clubs came in for him as opposed to blackburn beating them off. batty was a league winner...so was lee chapman, doesn't mean the bigger clubs wanted him. blackburn bought but biought well as opposed to doing a chelsea and beating everyone else off with cash. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 I find myself disgareeing with Otter completely for the first time in about a year. Well done, mate, What a good poster you've become. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 I find myself disgareeing with Otter completely for the first time in about a year. Well done, mate, What a good poster you've become. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldtype Posted March 8, 2011 Share Posted March 8, 2011 I find myself disgareeing with Otter completely for the first time in about a year. Well done, mate, What a good poster you've become. I don't know which part is more creepy, the content of the post itself or the fact that Ronaldo typed a smiley face. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now