JH Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 Imagine if we had the same rules here. Literally no one would have made it past Pardew's first week Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 Imagine if we had the same rules here. Literally no one would have made it past Pardew's first week no one would have made it past the first day of the possibility of Pardew Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 After being warned, yes. Then you are stopped from posting, i know you might say i'm splitting hairs but i dont think so. Its a pathetic way to run a blog, adhere to the rules such as the ones on here and 99% of other blogs yes, but to have to follow strict rules on what you can post, especially when what you post is what you think, involves no swearing, libel or legal problems etc. Its just a mental, mental deranged site, rather like Liverpool the club who you may just have got the gist that i hate more than Mrs bimpy. I'm getting the distinct impression that your dislike for Liverpool is colouring your view somewhat Sure, the moderation on here is laxer than on RAWK, but it's laxer on RAWK than a lot of other forums (CFCnet springs to mind). They're the RAWK mods, it's their forum, and they get to make the rules. Agree with them or not, they're consistent about locking threads that are critical but not constructive. By and large, they're just trying to run a forum, and posters who consistently cause the mods work by shit-stirring and filling the forum with crap will eventually run into the banhammer. Like I said, RAWK's a much bigger forum than N-O, and it's a lot more work trying to keep an eye on a few dozen idiots than two or three. That said, they didn't exactly cover themselves in glory with the whole Kenny and Suarez RAWK business. That was all very 1984. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 After being warned, yes. Then you are stopped from posting, i know you might say i'm splitting hairs but i dont think so. Its a pathetic way to run a blog, adhere to the rules such as the ones on here and 99% of other blogs yes, but to have to follow strict rules on what you can post, especially when what you post is what you think, involves no swearing, libel or legal problems etc. Its just a mental, mental deranged site, rather like Liverpool the club who you may just have got the gist that i hate more than Mrs bimpy. I'm getting the distinct impression that your dislike for Liverpool is colouring your view somewhat Sure, the moderation on here is laxer than on RAWK, but it's laxer on RAWK than a lot of other forums (CFCnet springs to mind). They're the RAWK mods, it's their forum, and they get to make the rules. Agree with them or not, they're consistent about locking threads that are critical but not constructive. By and large, they're just trying to run a forum, and posters who consistently cause the mods work by shit-stirring and filling the forum with crap will eventually run into the banhammer. Like I said, RAWK's a much bigger forum than N-O, and it's a lot more work trying to keep an eye on a few dozen idiots than two or three. That said, they didn't exactly cover themselves in glory with the whole Kenny and Suarez RAWK business. That was all very 1984. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 After being warned, yes. Then you are stopped from posting, i know you might say i'm splitting hairs but i dont think so. Its a pathetic way to run a blog, adhere to the rules such as the ones on here and 99% of other blogs yes, but to have to follow strict rules on what you can post, especially when what you post is what you think, involves no swearing, libel or legal problems etc. Its just a mental, mental deranged site, rather like Liverpool the club who you may just have got the gist that i hate more than Mrs bimpy. I'm getting the distinct impression that your dislike for Liverpool is colouring your view somewhat Sure, the moderation on here is laxer than on RAWK, but it's laxer on RAWK than a lot of other forums (CFCnet springs to mind). They're the RAWK mods, it's their forum, and they get to make the rules. Agree with them or not, they're consistent about locking threads that are critical but not constructive. By and large, they're just trying to run a forum, and posters who consistently cause the mods work by shit-stirring and filling the forum with crap will eventually run into the banhammer. Like I said, RAWK's a much bigger forum than N-O, and it's a lot more work trying to keep an eye on a few dozen idiots than two or three. That said, they didn't exactly cover themselves in glory with the whole Kenny and Suarez RAWK business. That was all very 1984. Oh we have a bigger forum. Pathetic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 RAWK Meltdown is possibly the only reason to use twitter. They boil down the more self-congratluatory, toe curlingly, cringeworthy posts and post them on twitter, some are so 'Liverpool' such as: 'We aimed for the ceiling. Rafa took us to the sky. We aimed for the moon and Rafa took us to the sun and our light was shining bright.' and.... 'Could you imagine Mr Alex Fergusons face when Rafa walked through the door. Shudders would be sent around Europe.' Sorry but Liverpool are THE only supporters that spout that sort of tripe. Eye=wateringly embarrassing and usually scrawled on banners as an accompaniment. Some of them are so up their own backside it's untrue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 'We aimed for the ceiling. Rafa took us to the sky. We aimed for the moon and Rafa took us to the sun and our light was shining bright.' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 After being warned, yes. Then you are stopped from posting, i know you might say i'm splitting hairs but i dont think so. Its a pathetic way to run a blog, adhere to the rules such as the ones on here and 99% of other blogs yes, but to have to follow strict rules on what you can post, especially when what you post is what you think, involves no swearing, libel or legal problems etc. Its just a mental, mental deranged site, rather like Liverpool the club who you may just have got the gist that i hate more than Mrs bimpy. I'm getting the distinct impression that your dislike for Liverpool is colouring your view somewhat Sure, the moderation on here is laxer than on RAWK, but it's laxer on RAWK than a lot of other forums (CFCnet springs to mind). They're the RAWK mods, it's their forum, and they get to make the rules. Agree with them or not, they're consistent about locking threads that are critical but not constructive. By and large, they're just trying to run a forum, and posters who consistently cause the mods work by shit-stirring and filling the forum with crap will eventually run into the banhammer. Like I said, RAWK's a much bigger forum than N-O, and it's a lot more work trying to keep an eye on a few dozen idiots than two or three. That said, they didn't exactly cover themselves in glory with the whole Kenny and Suarez RAWK business. That was all very 1984. Oh we have a bigger forum. Pathetic. Yeah, cos that's what I was saying Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 The irritating thing is the conceit that Liverpool fans are supposedly less inclined to moan about their manager than fans of other clubs do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted June 10, 2012 Share Posted June 10, 2012 After being warned, yes. Then you are stopped from posting, i know you might say i'm splitting hairs but i dont think so. Its a pathetic way to run a blog, adhere to the rules such as the ones on here and 99% of other blogs yes, but to have to follow strict rules on what you can post, especially when what you post is what you think, involves no swearing, libel or legal problems etc. Its just a mental, mental deranged site, rather like Liverpool the club who you may just have got the gist that i hate more than Mrs bimpy. I'm getting the distinct impression that your dislike for Liverpool is colouring your view somewhat Sure, the moderation on here is laxer than on RAWK, but it's laxer on RAWK than a lot of other forums (CFCnet springs to mind). They're the RAWK mods, it's their forum, and they get to make the rules. Agree with them or not, they're consistent about locking threads that are critical but not constructive. By and large, they're just trying to run a forum, and posters who consistently cause the mods work by shit-stirring and filling the forum with crap will eventually run into the banhammer. Like I said, RAWK's a much bigger forum than N-O, and it's a lot more work trying to keep an eye on a few dozen idiots than two or three. That said, they didn't exactly cover themselves in glory with the whole Kenny and Suarez RAWK business. That was all very 1984. Oh we have a bigger forum. Pathetic. Yeah, cos that's what I was saying Erm, joke hence the smile, and the fact that the "pathetic" quip is used a lot on here What happened to the famous scouse humour you all have, i know it doesn't exist, its complete bollocks, god damn Harry Enfield Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 Sorry. Tongue-in-cheek doesn't always survive transcription to text. A wink would have helped Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 Imagine if we had the same rules here. Literally no one would have made it past Pardew's first week The forum would have imploded like a black hole. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 'We aimed for the ceiling. Rafa took us to the sky. We aimed for the moon and Rafa took us to the sun and our light was shining bright.' Justice for the broken ceiling Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
maybe_next_year Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 RAWK Meltdown is possibly the only reason to use twitter. They boil down the more self-congratluatory, toe curlingly, cringeworthy posts and post them on twitter, some are so 'Liverpool' such as: 'We aimed for the ceiling. Rafa took us to the sky. We aimed for the moon and Rafa took us to the sun and our light was shining bright.' and.... 'Could you imagine Mr Alex Fergusons face when Rafa walked through the door. Shudders would be sent around Europe.' Sorry but Liverpool are THE only supporters that spout that sort of tripe. Eye=wateringly embarrassing and usually scrawled on banners as an accompaniment. Some of them are so up their own backside it's untrue. its like sir ricky sbragia, except they are actually serious Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Maul Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 'We aimed for the ceiling. Rafa took us to the sky. We aimed for the moon and Rafa took us to the sun and our light was shining bright.' :lol: Jesus wept Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 Imagine if we had the same rules here. Literally no one would have made it past Pardew's first week The forum would have imploded like a black hole. On the other hand, if there had been such a rule in place, you'd all now be able to say sagely, "I knew he was the right man for the job." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 Wacko, does your sig not now need changing? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 Liverpool supporting friends already calling him "Brendan". "Can't wait to see who Brendan will sign" "Have you seen Brendan's possession stats with Swansea? Only second to Barcelona in the whole of Europe" "I'm sure Brendan can convince Cavani and Ben Arfa that their future is at Anfield" I can't for the life of me imagine referring to the NUFC manager, whomever he may be at the time, by his first name! "Alan is a right cheeky bastard" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 Liverpool supporting friends already calling him "Brendan". "Can't wait to see who Brendan will sign" "Have you seen Brendan's possession stats with Swansea? Only second to Barcelona in the whole of Europe" "I'm sure Brendan can convince Cavani and Ben Arfa that their future is at Anfield" I can't for the life of me imagine referring to the NUFC manager, whomever he may be at the time, by his first name! "Alan is a right cheeky b******" Aside from Bobby Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 Wacko, does your sig not now need changing? Fuck! Yeah it does Edit: Done Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 Chuckle. Nice one Wacko. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 The latest from RAWK meltdown may be the best yet and demonstrates the total lack of self awareness that some Liverpool fans suffer from 'I'd be f***ing ashamed to have won the way they (Chelsea) did in the Champions league final' Unbelievable!! Words fail me!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ted Maul Posted June 11, 2012 Share Posted June 11, 2012 The latest from RAWK meltdown may be the best yet and demonstrates the total lack of self awareness that some Liverpool fans suffer from 'I'd be f***ing ashamed to have won the way they (Chelsea) did in the Champions league final' Unbelievable!! Words fail me!! In fairness I've heard that bullshit from the mouths of a lot of bitter non-Chelsea supporters tbh. Unbelievable though, truly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 http://www.redandwhitekop.com/forum/index.php?topic=294794.0 The bias in some of these posts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted June 22, 2012 Share Posted June 22, 2012 Gerrard is actually very difficult. All the rest have talent alright (Xavi in abundance!!) but how do assess a player who can play at the top of the game in 7-8 outfield positions and be world class in 2 or 3? What in the absolute fuck is this? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now