themanupstairs Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 As hilarious as it is, the FA really are a joke. Just plucking random numbers from wherever with no consistency, deciding which incidents to punish and which not to based on technicalities. The fact Defoe got away with just a yellow for an identical incident, whereas another player is given a 10 game ban... it's absurd. This is the ridiculous thing about it. IMO the 10 game ban is harsh on LFC. As much as I don't like that club, the fans who pay good money to watch the team, as well as the manager and Suarez' teammates will be deprived of their best player for 10 games. The punishment targets LFC far more than Suarez himself. IMO he should get the standard 3 match ban for violent conduct, with a massive financial fine added on top of that. Say 7 weeks' wages to complete the "10". He should be warned on future conduct, with exponentially increasing fines and possible lawsuits for bringing the game into disrepute. The big book should be thrown at Suarez big time, but not the club he plays for, as I'm pretty sure he didn't bite anyone under instruction. My feeling is that the 10 game ban is to exert pressure on Liverpool to sell the c*** in the summer, and even in that case it is unfair on the club who could have to settle for a knockdown fee. Again, they suffer and not the offender himself. None of this is the FA's fault, only Suarez to blame here. Some level headed Liverpool fans even see this, though not many. Absolutely! But is him sitting out for 10 games a punishment? He'll get an early summer vacation and still earn a fuck load of money. What kind of punishment is that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Disagree wholeheartedly with that, this is the risk you take when you buy absolute pricks. I understand that. I'm just playing devil's advocate because the FA really ARE a bunch of fuckwits, and I cannot wrap my head around their random decision making. It's a travesty that Aguero gets away scot-free while Giroud's appeal was turned down and he has to serve a 3 match ban. McManaman gets nothing, and Cabaye gets 3(?) matches for his retaliation on El Abd. It's an absolute joke, and this willy nilly arbitration affects clubs more than they punish the player. By all accounts, Suarez had cleaned up his act relatively of late, so how were his club supposed to know he would do this? Believe me, I hate the cunt with the fire of a thousand suns. Just feel that the FA are dicking around with the rules and there are no standards to adhere to. Yeah, fair enough - I agree with much of what you've said there, just not that Suarez and Liverpool didn't have it coming. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor Swift Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 10 game ban means Parky gets a pen. If we win, pretty much confirming our status then the pen is converted.the Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 The funny thing is if you watch it he really grabs the arm likes he's hungry... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 I suppose the only way this ban is fair is if LFC stop paying his wages for the entire period for which he is suspended. Only then will the ban make sense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 They'll probably give him a bonus on top to show support of their fallen victim. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Various wakes, demo's, sit ins. chicken foetuses, sob stories, crocodile tears are in preperation as we speak. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 As hilarious as it is, the FA really are a joke. Just plucking random numbers from wherever with no consistency, deciding which incidents to punish and which not to based on technicalities. The fact Defoe got away with just a yellow for an identical incident, whereas another player is given a 10 game ban... it's absurd. This is the ridiculous thing about it. IMO the 10 game ban is harsh on LFC. As much as I don't like that club, the fans who pay good money to watch the team, as well as the manager and Suarez' teammates will be deprived of their best player for 10 games. The punishment targets LFC far more than Suarez himself. IMO he should get the standard 3 match ban for violent conduct, with a massive financial fine added on top of that. Say 7 weeks' wages to complete the "10". He should be warned on future conduct, with exponentially increasing fines and possible lawsuits for bringing the game into disrepute. The big book should be thrown at Suarez big time, but not the club he plays for, as I'm pretty sure he didn't bite anyone under instruction. My feeling is that the 10 game ban is to exert pressure on Liverpool to sell the c*** in the summer, and even in that case it is unfair on the club who could have to settle for a knockdown fee. Again, they suffer and not the offender himself. None of this is the FA's fault, only Suarez to blame here. Some level headed Liverpool fans even see this, though not many. Absolutely! But is him sitting out for 10 games a punishment? He'll get an early summer vacation and still earn a fuck load of money. What kind of punishment is that? Think he'll be gutted personally. Cunt behaviour aside football means a huge amount to him, missing 10 games will piss him off no end, football seems to drive him snd he does these stupid things out of the desire to win at sll costs. however I do understand your point there really is no fitting punishment, unless the fa sanction a fine scaled to his ten game ban as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Fuck Liverpool tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Fuck Liverpool tbh. You've really got it in for Mike tonight like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 World class player, first class fuckwit. Probably at the right club as well, fuckwit club, full of fuckwit players, watched by fuckwit fans. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasper Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 He's diabetic, was running low on blood sugar and thought the hand was a Mars bar. There you go Liverpool. Feel free to use that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHoob Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Absolutely! But is him sitting out for 10 games a punishment? He'll get an early summer vacation and still earn a f*** load of money. What kind of punishment is that? Liverpool must be partly to blame then? Bloke from the PFA on TalkSport earlier saying that the Liverpool fine would have been 2 weeks wages as it's the most a club can fine without consulting them. If Liverpool cared enough about the image they keep bleating on about they'd have made an example that no-one is bigger than the club and hit him with a big fine, that way Suarez is hit twice and Liverpool would have gained back some respect they've lost over the last few years. Looks like they've took the easy way out and went for the typical self-pity bollocks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted April 24, 2013 Share Posted April 24, 2013 Anybody saying it's harsh forgets exactly what nasty diseases a bite can transmit. I doubt Suarez has got Hepatitis but if I was Ivanovic, I wouldn't fancy having the little cunt gnawing on my arm to find out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
newsted Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Anybody saying it's harsh forgets exactly what nasty diseases a bite can transmit. I doubt Suarez has got Hepatitis but if I was Ivanovic, I wouldn't fancy having the little cunt gnawing on my arm to find out. Aye, human mouths are filthy. I don't let them near me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Anybody saying it's harsh forgets exactly what nasty diseases a bite can transmit. I doubt Suarez has got Hepatitis but if I was Ivanovic, I wouldn't fancy having the little c*** gnawing on my arm to find out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 I'm not sure if it's been said but if the appeal is rejected the FA can increase it. The guy has previous for biting when he was in Holland, he's also been banned for racism. He has previous so how anyone can complain against it is beyond me. It's worthy of a 10 match ban even if it was a players who didn't have previous. Yes it shows inconstancy the FA's 'no overturning decisions that happened during a match' policy, but the ban itself should have no complaints. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_NUFC Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Dude's a cunt and for once the FA agrees with this view held by the majority. Despicable wanker. His theatrics against Ghana was the first time I realized what kind of shitbag he was, and he's only piled more and more shit into his bag of being since then. Piece of shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wacko Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 That's fucking class Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Reading some similar bans in the paper today its really hard to see how anyone can find it harsh: Barton 12 games(violent behavior) Di Canio 11 games(pushing ref) Prutton 10 games(pushing ref) Thatcher 8 games(violent behavior) Batty 6 games(pushing ref) Keane 5 games(only 2 extra for admitting he went out to hurt Haarland) His history(surely Liverpool fans of all people know the value of history) and crime fit the ban imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Roger Kint Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Oh and Messi Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 25, 2013 Share Posted April 25, 2013 Dude's a cunt and for once the FA agrees with this view held by the majority. Despicable wanker. His theatrics against Ghana was the first time I realized what kind of shitbag he was, and he's only piled more and more shit into his bag of being since then. Piece of shit. Just want him out of the country ASAP basically. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now