Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Glad Everton got that. Chelsea Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Chelsea aren't going to finish in the top 4 at this rate anyway. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Chelsea aren't going to finish in the top 4 at this rate anyway. If their passion continue to be absent, that could easily be the result. Much depends on Torres though. If he rediscovers his form, 4th place is no problem. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 It is when Spurs, Arsenal, City and Utd keep winning. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 It is when Spurs, Arsenal, City and Utd keep winning. And here's hoping. They have a fairly tough run-in too if memory serves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 I'd rather Chelsea finish top 4 rather than Spuds tbh. I'm bored of the wankfest over them after every CL game on Sky as it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 It is when Spurs, Arsenal, City and Utd keep winning. True. But Spurs could have a problem because of their lack of attackers. When they play with Vart and Crouch they become very predictable: Everything must go through the former, or they try to hit Crouch's head with him serving Vart. They miss many chances, and that could be fatal if Chelsea pick up pace. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 I'd rather Chelsea finish top 4 rather than Spuds tbh. I'm bored of the wankfest over them after every CL game on Sky as it is. Disagree. I'm all in favor of teams that actually have managed to establish themselves through a sensible economical strategy. Chelsea was on the brink of economical ruin when they were saved by Abrahimovich. The club is loosing £70 mill a year, consist of arrogant, couldn't care less-kind-of-players, have zero talent development, and is totally dependent on its owner. That's not good for the league. That Tham is able to compete with the likes City and Chelsea, without being run like them, is very healthy for the league. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Gateshead 4-1 up at Wrexham! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Gateshead 4-1 up at Wrexham! Gan on the heeeed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Torres is surely euro tied for Chelsea? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Looking at their live league table, they're 11 points off the play-offs with 3 games in hand as things stand. No chance of them doing it, but that would be amazing if they did it...Wrexham are 4th which makes that scoreline even more remarkable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 The freekick by Baines was f***** unbelievable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
leffe186 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 I'd rather Chelsea finish top 4 rather than Spuds tbh. I'm bored of the wankfest over them after every CL game on Sky as it is. Disagree. I'm all in favor of teams that actually have managed to establish themselves through a sensible economical strategy. Chelsea was on the brink of economical ruin when they were saved by Abrahimovich. The club is loosing £70 mill a year, consist of arrogant, couldn't care less-kind-of-players, have zero talent development, and is totally dependent on its owner. That's not good for the league. That Tham is able to compete with the likes City and Chelsea, without being run like them, is very healthy for the league. Losing 70M and they've just spent more than that on two players. Anderson, I can't imagine it's really boredom. Chelsea not getting into the CL would be bloody hilarious, far more entertaining. It's all right to say you don't like Spurs, you know (or that you're a little bit jealous ). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oakie Doke Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Martins just missed an absolute sitter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Martins just missed an absolute sitter. That's one of the reasons why we went down. Periodically he scores some stunning goals. The problem is that he misses chances a toddler would have buried. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 There were about 6 players moreso to blame for relegation than Obafemi Martins, like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Punk77 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Martins just missed an absolute sitter. There were about 6 players moreso to blame for relegation than Obafemi Martins, like. That's one of the reasons why we went down. Periodically he scores some stunning goals. The problem is that he misses chances a toddler would have buried. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 There were about 6 players moreso to blame for relegation than Obafemi Martins, like. How, one reason we went down was mainly to do with the shocking amount of goals which we scored all season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Of course. But the likes Owen, Viduka, Butt, Jonas, Duff, and Guthrie were worse. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Wrexham 2-7 Gateshead Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Duff was one of our better players in the run-in that season. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Duff was one of our better players in the run-in that season. Wa? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Duff was one of our better players in the run-in that season. Would agree with that actually. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted February 19, 2011 Share Posted February 19, 2011 Duff was horrendous. His predictability, especially at fullback was awful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts