Guest Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Would like a City win because I could see them even sneaking 3rd if they did. Would rub it in Arsenal's faces even more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ObiChrisKenobi Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 I assume there's nowt happening in the match Nothing at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chubby Jason Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 So boring. I never thought I'd be a Spurs fan but I'd give anything not to see City play in the Champions League next season, they're dire. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Don't like Kolarov. His dribbling style is irritatingly ungainly and he can't defend. All he can really do is strike a football quite well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 So boring. I never thought I'd be a Spurs fan but I'd give anything not to see City play in the Champions League next season, they're dire. Mainly cause the commit so few forward in attacks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chubby Jason Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 To be fair to Spurs they play fantastic stuff, this City side is just painful to watch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 To be fair to Spurs they play fantastic stuff, this City side is just painful to watch. Myth. City without 2 holders are brilliant and dynamic to watch. Sunderland a few weeks ago as an example. Spurs on the other hand can be entertaining when they simply throw caution to the wind, but a lot of their game is brainless wing-play and lumps to Crouch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 I agree with City that they're annoying underusing the talent in their ranks when they go with two holding midfielders like, but the idea that Spurs are a fantastic footballing side is grossly overplayed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chubby Jason Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Myth? No, just an honest opinion and one founded on the utter dross City serve up almost in every game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Snrub Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 I think Spurs play good, passing football more than Man City. Also, how boring are their fans? Blue Moon > 15 minutes silence > blue moon > 15 minute silence > copy Lech Poznan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chubby Jason Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 I live in Manchester and know an utterly insufferable Man City fan that sings those songs on a night out. It's the main reason I hate the club so much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Blackburn should be ahead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 To be fair to Spurs they play fantastic stuff, this City side is just painful to watch. Myth. City without 2 holders are brilliant and dynamic to watch. Sunderland a few weeks ago as an example. Spurs on the other hand can be entertaining when they simply throw caution to the wind, but a lot of their game is brainless wing-play and lumps to Crouch. You're saying City play a better brand of football then us? ok mate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 How was that not a freekick? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Spurs play just as much shite football. It's very irritating that their hoofs to Crouch seem to be completely brushed under the carpet while other teams are slammed for the direct style. Similarly teams are criticised for the 'numbers game' of set pieces while Spurs' reliance on bland wing play is similarly boring. Spurs are largely idealised as an attacking, 'good' footballing side because they throw caution to the wind making for entertaining games. Really their football is simplistic and not very dynamic. This is why they have conceded far more goals than City and have actually scored 1 fewer too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Balotelli is thick as fuck. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 You're saying City play a better brand of football then us? ok mate. I'd say you both bore and entertain in equal measure tbh. For different reasons. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmonkey Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Take Modric out of the Spurs side and they'd be as unpleasant to watch as Bolton. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Don't like Kolarov. His dribbling style is irritatingly ungainly and he can't defend. All he can really do is strike a football quite well. That's why I like him so much. Shoots from wherever he feels like. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Take Modric out of the Spurs side and they'd be as unpleasant to watch as Bolton. Bolton playing some decent stuff under Coyle. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Take Modric out of the Spurs side and they'd be as unpleasant to watch as Bolton. That's the one thing why Spurs should be praised, having faith in playing a diminutive player like Modric right in the thick of things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 I'm still bitter about us not signing Modric. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeloEmre Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Didn't touch him? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 You're saying City play a better brand of football then us? ok mate. I'd say you both bore and entertain in equal measure tbh. For different reasons. I think you're totally wrong but i would say that. City play a slow paced game that relies heavily on Carlos Tevez. They play 2 sitters ffs and rarely try anything adventorous. When Tevez isn't about they have Edin Dzeko who's a damn good striker but due to City's slow paced, non existant wing play he looks like he was signed from Stevenage Borough and not a 32m striker from Wolfsburg. Did yo watch us against them this season? we opened them up at will. Totally dismantled them but their defensive set up and motm goalkeeping by Hart got them a point. What about the 2 games last season? we trounced them at ours 3-0 and beat them at theirs too where we controlled the game. All they do against good teams is set out to defend and get a goal on the counter...even at home ffs. One thing i will say is that they're more efficient than us this season due to their great backline and our crop of shit strikers. You say we scored 1 less then them this season which is absolutely brilliant being that our strikers have been utter turd and they possess a World class striker in Tevez that saves them week after week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest kingdawson Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Take Modric out of the Spurs side and they'd be as unpleasant to watch as Bolton. Modric was out for quite a chunk of last season yet we still ended up winning the majority of games he didnt play in (even beating citeh 3-0 without him) and was sitting comfortably in 4th playing attractive football. Your point is void. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts