Dr Venkman Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 Should be fined, ludicrous behaviour. Is it that gif on the previous page you're referring to? In that case - wow. Any player should be fined for dissent tbh. They're human beings man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 Any player should be fined for dissent tbh. His reaction was childish, nothing more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 We'd get booked all the time man. Think about how you are when you play Fifa when you feel like you've been fucked over. Id get a 12 match ban in almost every match. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DubblyDubblyDubbly Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 He deserves some credit for placing the ball on the ground and turning away from the ref before losing the plot.... but clearly not in the eyes of Red Webb. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiotes Witch Doctor Posted October 8, 2012 Share Posted October 8, 2012 Should be fined, ludicrous behaviour. Fined? For over reacting due to disappointment? Are you serious? Only person who should be fined should be Howard Webb for bringing out a yellow card for absolutely nothing, Tiote have every right to be disgusted This Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest nufc_89 Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Absolutley loved it, he´s a true charachter. His willingness to win is a reason why he´ll always have a place in my heart, both as a Newcastle fan and as a fan of football in general. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 He was well within his right to kick off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Segun Oluwaniyi Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 If I remember correctly, the booking was for releasing his inner demon all over the pitch, rather than the actual foul that proceeded it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 That's what I thought, and if it was it's just as outrageous if not more so. It wasn't 'aimed' at anyone. Not like the horrible saliva filled words of John Terry when he shouts at a ref, or 7 or 8 Man Utd players when they disagree with a decision. Regardless of whether it was the foul or the 'dissent', it shouldn't have been a yellow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 I honestly think he's over rated, and would sell him for £15-£18M if such an offer come. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Dissent verb (used without object) to differ in sentiment or opinion Law 12 - Fouls and misconduct A player is cautioned and shown the yellow card if he commits any of the following seven offences - Dissent by word or action There probably hasn't been a clearer booking in the history of the game. Fucking get over it. And there's no such thing as "Justified dissent", as if Webb getting the decision wrong prior to that one suddenly makes it OK for Cheik to behave like a fucking child who's had his sweets taken off him. Call Webb a cunt all you like for blowing for the initial foul, but after Tiote acted like a petulant 3 year old he had no option but to show him a card. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
timnufc22 Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 Dissent verb (used without object) to differ in sentiment or opinion Law 12 - Fouls and misconduct A player is cautioned and shown the yellow card if he commits any of the following seven offences - Dissent by word or action There probably hasn't been a clearer booking in the history of the game. f***ing get over it. And there's no such thing as "Justified dissent", as if Webb getting the decision wrong prior to that one suddenly makes it OK for Cheik to behave like a f***ing child who's had his sweets taken off him. Call Webb a c*** all you like for blowing for the initial foul, but after Tiote acted like a petulant 3 year old he had no option but to show him a card. Its common sense, theres a difference between a clear 'in your face' dissent, swearing etc, and being gutted & dismayed the foul has been given, facing away from the ref aswell... I remember when we played Juventus away, ref blew for a free kick egde of the box, Dabizas rolled on the ground in disapointment because he couldnt believe it was given. Whys he do that? Because he's passionate and desparate to win. He was never a disrespectful player in a million years, its different shades of dissapointment and clear dissent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted October 9, 2012 Share Posted October 9, 2012 I honestly think he's over rated, and would sell him for £15-£18M if such an offer come. http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/avs/avatar_104_1337025797.png Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 Its common sense You see, it's not though, is it? What Tiote did was a cautionable offence by both the laws of the game and the definition of word "dissent". I even posted both of them above. Common sense is completely fucking irrelevant. Howard Webb, and every other referee works from this: http://www.thefa.com/thefa/rulesandregulations/~/media/Files/PDF/the-fa-2012-13/fifa-laws-of-the-game-2012-13.ashx Now you can debate his performance in relation to other incidents all you like (But I'd still suggest cross-referencing with the above, for clarity), but in relation to this decision he got it absolutely right. However there is someone to blame for Tiote's booking. Sadly, it's Tiote. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kasper Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 Dissent verb (used without object) to differ in sentiment or opinion Law 12 - Fouls and misconduct A player is cautioned and shown the yellow card if he commits any of the following seven offences - Dissent by word or action There probably hasn't been a clearer booking in the history of the game. Fucking get over it. And there's no such thing as "Justified dissent", as if Webb getting the decision wrong prior to that one suddenly makes it OK for Cheik to behave like a fucking child who's had his sweets taken off him. Call Webb a cunt all you like for blowing for the initial foul, but after Tiote acted like a petulant 3 year old he had no option but to show him a card. Spot on that. Immiediately thought he would get a yellow after he went apeshit over it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest n4e Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 I honestly think he's over rated, and would sell him for £15-£18M if such an offer come. http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/avs/avatar_104_1337025797.png Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 Dissent verb (used without object) to differ in sentiment or opinion Law 12 - Fouls and misconduct A player is cautioned and shown the yellow card if he commits any of the following seven offences - Dissent by word or action There probably hasn't been a clearer booking in the history of the game. f***ing get over it. And there's no such thing as "Justified dissent", as if Webb getting the decision wrong prior to that one suddenly makes it OK for Cheik to behave like a f***ing child who's had his sweets taken off him. Call Webb a c*** all you like for blowing for the initial foul, but after Tiote acted like a petulant 3 year old he had no option but to show him a card. Doesn't excuse the fact that it's one rule for the big boys and another for everyone else. Man Utd are probably the biggest offenders in this department and yet they never get punished. It's bullshit! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 Its common sense You see, it's not though, is it? What Tiote did was a cautionable offence by both the laws of the game and the definition of word "dissent". I even posted both of them above. Common sense is completely fucking irrelevant. Howard Webb, and every other referee works from this: http://www.thefa.com/thefa/rulesandregulations/~/media/Files/PDF/the-fa-2012-13/fifa-laws-of-the-game-2012-13.ashx Now you can debate his performance in relation to other incidents all you like (But I'd still suggest cross-referencing with the above, for clarity), but in relation to this decision he got it absolutely right. However there is someone to blame for Tiote's booking. Sadly, it's Tiote. Hmm, on occasion. Fair enough to the letter of the law he's guilty. A bit of consistency across the board would be nice, though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
womblemaster Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 http://i1.mirror.co.uk/incoming/article1366128.ece/ALTERNATES/s615b/Cheick+the+frustration great pic! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 Its common sense You see, it's not though, is it? What Tiote did was a cautionable offence by both the laws of the game and the definition of word "dissent". I even posted both of them above. Common sense is completely f***ing irrelevant. Howard Webb, and every other referee works from this: http://www.thefa.com/thefa/rulesandregulations/~/media/Files/PDF/the-fa-2012-13/fifa-laws-of-the-game-2012-13.ashx Now you can debate his performance in relation to other incidents all you like (But I'd still suggest cross-referencing with the above, for clarity), but in relation to this decision he got it absolutely right. However there is someone to blame for Tiote's booking. Sadly, it's Tiote. Hmm, on occasion. Fair enough to the letter of the law he's guilty. A bit of consistency across the board would be nice, though. On occasion? To the letter of the law? FFS. Get the fucking black and white specs off and look at this dispassionately. His was the most flagrant display of dissent I've seen in a long time and he deserved every single bit of his yellow card. Consistency isn't relevant here, this isn't some kind of borderline decision that we're looking at here, it's the clearest yellow for dissent that has been handed out this year. It was embarrassing watching him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fish Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 On occasion? To the letter of the law? FFS. Get the f***ing black and white specs off and look at this dispassionately. His was the most flagrant display of dissent I've seen in a long time... It was embarrassing watching him. Way to be dispassionate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest hydeous Posted October 10, 2012 Share Posted October 10, 2012 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 http://i46.tinypic.com/ciwxj.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 Looks like a Vietnam soldier Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted October 13, 2012 Share Posted October 13, 2012 That guy is too fucking stacked man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now