summerof69 Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 Similar to Ben Arfa in France, aswell. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Curls Posted November 14, 2011 Share Posted November 14, 2011 To think players can find relative peace in the goldfish bowl, isn't it ironic. On topic I think santon can become a good player here, no real expectations so he can play worry free hopefully. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie jamie Posted November 15, 2011 Share Posted November 15, 2011 I thought Santon was the Italian U21 captain? If he is seems strange why he would be on the bench unless he is not fit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parky Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 There's either something wrong with him or Pardew is dithering. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broadsword Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 Enrique started the same with a extended period on the bench. Didn't turn out to bad in the end. He will come good I'm sure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 R.Taylor and defence play well = Santon on bench. Simple, really. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 Pardew doesn't take people off if they;re playing well, don't think it's anything to do with Santon. It'll tale a bit for Santon to get the same understanding with the defensive line, wonder if Pardew is waiting for a run of easier games to bring him in Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
abertoon Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 My guess would be Pardews trying to establish a rule by where players aren't automatically displacing other players on good form just because of their reputation.. Keeps the players in the team playing well knowing that a dip in form could see them benched... we'll soon find out if there's any truth to this come the next game, should be a straight swap with Raylor and his shirt to lose, hopefully! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 There's either something wrong with him or Pardew is dithering. Or the obvious one. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 My guess is we had the best defence in the league so thought it would be the right thing not to change it. No problem imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 My guess is we had the best defence in the league so thought it would be the right thing not to change it. No problem imo. yep, I doubt he'll even change it for Man U, but then it does beg the question what has ho happen for Santon to get a chance. I suppose a couple of games against lesser teams conceding a few would do it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 It's a difficult job but one thing i think the media have been spot on about is having such a consistent back 5 is more important than trying to blood in more naturally talented players. Raylor has his faults, makes mistakes like yesterday but I don't buy this 'liability, waiting for mistakes to happen' business, he hasnt been infallible but he has played his part in our massively impressive start. If he becomes a problem make changes but for me, so far he isn't a problem. That's from someone who would have left him leave for free in the summer fwiw. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 It's times like yesterday that he should be getting 15-20 minutes. 3-0 down against Man City and we're bringing on Lovenkrands, Perch and Gosling (the latter fair enough). He could have even came onto the right wing ahead of Sammy if Pardew was scared of conceding more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmk Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 Yeah something doesn't seem right. We should have seen him have more minutes on the pitch by now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 When he has played, he's looked good. He hasn't Ryan Taylor'd anything yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
womblemaster Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 Pardew is dithering. sounds right. imo his decisions are too soft at times. Think hes too used to charming everyone, and cant play the bastard, like ferguson or other `great` managers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 It's times like yesterday that he should be getting 15-20 minutes. 3-0 down against Man City and we're bringing on Lovenkrands, Perch and Gosling (the latter fair enough). He could have even came onto the right wing ahead of Sammy if Pardew was scared of conceding more. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 Or possibly we knew the game was lost, so stick players in who are expendible and don't care if they pick up an unnecessary knock or booking (Lovenkrands, Perch). Look at the stick he got by many on here when he stuck Tiote on at Stevenage when the game was pretty much lost. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 I thought, at the time, that bringing Tiote on against Stevenage made a lot of sense. [/tinhat] Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 About time we started making up additional payments per game clauses isn't it? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 Or possibly we knew the game was lost, so stick players in who are expendible and don't care if they pick up an unnecessary knock or booking (Lovenkrands, Perch). Look at the stick he got by many on here when he stuck Tiote on at Stevenage when the game was pretty much lost. Tiote didn't need games though. The critisism I seem to remember from the cup games is that he was pushed off the ball and lost the 50/50s, this won't improve from the stands, he needs to get a taste of the "physicality of the Premier League" /cringe I am aware that any opinion I have is slightly void like, Pardew obviously knows a lot more behind the scenes than we do. EDIT: Also we cannot just not play anyone incase they get injured or sent off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
powellnufc Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 I assumed he was giving Raylor a chance to redeem himself, given that the game was lost. If he had just taken him off and then not started him next match his confidence would be knocked even worse. At least Pardew showed him that he has faith in him by giving him until the end of the match to try and improve. This allows him to give Santon a chance without damaging Raylor morale too much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 R.Taylor and defence play well = Santon on bench. Simple, really. That logic seems faulty to me, but appears to be in line with Pardew's thinking. Explains why Ben Arfa has struggled to get into the team (other than for CC outings) until Best got injured. It's dithering in my mind. The dialysis is as follows, IMO: Cons: We lose the continuity of having a solid and settled back four in the short-term. We lose having a "known" quantity at left back. We lose some set piece ability (but with Cabaye around now, not as big a loss) We lose a really committed player who throws his body on the line (often to crucial effect) Pros: We gain a better footballer at left-back long term. We get back to having the continuity of a solid back four quicker (once Santon is settled in his role) We free up Jonas Gutierrez to doing the job of one man again. We play better football from the back, which is of benefit to our forwards who generally won't prosper from long balls. Four points each, but the weight of the "Pro" points dwarf the "Cons" for me. The sooner we move onto Santon the better. Raylor is a man and a well paid professional. He should have no problem dropping to the bench. It's laudable that he'd want to start, and long may it continue, but Pardew's care of duty is to the team playing good, winning football - not playing happy families. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David28 Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 R.Taylor and defence play well = Santon on bench. Simple, really. That logic seems faulty to me, but appears to be in line with Pardew's thinking. Explains why Ben Arfa has struggled to get into the team (other than for CC outings) until Best got injured. It's dithering in my mind. The dialysis is as follows, IMO: Cons: We lose the continuity of having a solid and settled back four in the short-term. We lose having a "known" quantity at left back. We lose some set piece ability (but with Cabaye around now, not as big a loss) We lose a really committed player who throws his body on the line (often to crucial effect) Pros: We gain a better footballer at left-back long term. We get back to having the continuity of a solid back four quicker (once Santon is settled in his role) We free up Jonas Gutierrez to doing the job of one man again. We play better football from the back, which is of benefit to our forwards who generally won't prosper from long balls. Four points each, but the weight of the "Pro" points dwarf the "Cons" for me. The sooner we move onto Santon the better. Raylor is a man and a well paid professional. He should have no problem dropping to the bench. It's laudable that he'd want to start, and long may it continue, but Pardew's care of duty is to the team playing good, winning football - not playing happy families. Agree with that. Probably the right time for Santon now. Would be a bit scared of the prospect of facing Ryan Taylor against Nani, Valencia or Young next weekend. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted November 20, 2011 Share Posted November 20, 2011 R.Taylor and defence play well = Santon on bench. Simple, really. That logic seems faulty to me, but appears to be in line with Pardew's thinking. Explains why Ben Arfa has struggled to get into the team (other than for CC outings) until Best got injured. It's dithering in my mind. The dialysis is as follows, IMO: Cons: We lose the continuity of having a solid and settled back four in the short-term. We lose having a "known" quantity at left back. We lose some set piece ability (but with Cabaye around now, not as big a loss) We lose a really committed player who throws his body on the line (often to crucial effect) Pros: We gain a better footballer at left-back long term. We get back to having the continuity of a solid back four quicker (once Santon is settled in his role) We free up Jonas Gutierrez to doing the job of one man again. We play better football from the back, which is of benefit to our forwards who generally won't prosper from long balls. Four points each, but the weight of the "Pro" points dwarf the "Cons" for me. The sooner we move onto Santon the better. Raylor is a man and a well paid professional. He should have no problem dropping to the bench. It's laudable that he'd want to start, and long may it continue, but Pardew's care of duty is to the team playing good, winning football - not playing happy families. And I agree totally now. I wouldn't have said the same this time yesterday though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now