maybe_next_year Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Wouldn't mind Anita having a bash at a regular role in the middle. Aye, I think a lot of people have unfairly written him off. Pardew included too probably. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Wouldn't mind Anita having a bash at a regular role in the middle. Aye, I think a lot of people have unfairly written him off. Pardew included too probably. Not according to his quotes, which we're supposed to take as gospel around here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Wouldn't mind Anita having a bash at a regular role in the middle. Aye, I think a lot of people have unfairly written him off. Pardew included too probably. Not according to his quotes, which we're supposed to take as gospel around here. He did actually say he intends to use Anita more next season, maybe we'll be suitably impressed as we were when he held Ben Arfa back. What am I saying?? He's a cunt, Pardew out! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Give me a midfield 3 of Cabaye-Sissoko-Anita and be done with it. That's all I ask. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 You don't ask for much. I absolutely hate the look of that midfield. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 You don't ask for much. I absolutely hate the look of that midfield. Why? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Because it's lacks everything, basically. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deuce Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 You don't ask for much. I absolutely hate the look of that midfield. Well I know you do, as there's no tackling thunderbastard in it. But most everyone else would love it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flip Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Would love it if we could replace him with someone like Capoue. Right now i would take a PL midfielder if we are after experience. Mulumbu? That Chile one? Bound to be a few others for reasonable prices who would do Tiotes job without 48 cards a season. I'd take a look at Roger Espinoza from Wigan. He's not a defensive midfielder though. Except he is... Hasn't played DM for Wigan though has he? Played higher up the pitch whenever he played centrally for Wigan this season. Does look like he played as a defensive midfielder in the MLS though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 You don't ask for much. I absolutely hate the look of that midfield. Well I know you do, as there's no tackling thunderbastard in it. But most everyone else would love it. Aye, that's why I've been advocating dropping Tiote all season while the likes of you were saying he'd be great if he'd just 'keep it simple'. I've no interest in a pure tackler. And I'd imagine about 3 or 4 people would 'love' such a midfield. The rest see it for what it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 You cannot just make a vague empowering statement and then be done, man. What is it exactly? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 As I said, it lacks everything. Creativity, dribbling, physicality, goals, ability to keep the ball in tight situations and turn it into positive possession. Marveaux, who's far from perfect absolutely strolls into that 3. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lotus Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 No, he wouldn't. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hughesy Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 As I said, it lacks everything. Creativity, dribbling, physicality, goals, ability to keep the ball in tight situations and turn it into positive possession. Marveaux, who's far from perfect absolutely strolls into that 3. It depends by what standard you are juding that midfield. By most reasonable standards, it has most of the qualities you claim it is lacking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Moody Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 I think Marv is one of our better players, but I don't think he's a central midfielder. He's more of a number 10 in my opinion. I'd take a: ------------------Sissoko------------------- -----Anita------------------------Cabaye-- Anyday. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronaldo Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 No, he wouldn't. Given that he's better than Anita at everything and far better creatively than Cabaye and Sissoko he would. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 As I said, it lacks everything. Creativity, dribbling, physicality, goals, ability to keep the ball in tight situations and turn it into positive possession. Marveaux, who's far from perfect absolutely strolls into that 3. Sissoko provides dribbling and physicality surely? Creative wise Cabaye is more than good enough when closer to goal and not picking the ball from CBs and Anita has the ability to keep the ball in tight situations and turn into positive possession. But i would prefer Marveaux infront of Cabaye and Sissoko how ever, but as i said before we can't rely on Marveaux which is why either Ben Arfa is given the same role on a consistent basis and a winger is bought and see where it takes us or we buy a new #10. Cabaye and Sissoko are fine but we need something in front of them who can play the final pass, neither Marveaux or Ben Arfa have been trusted enough consistently behind Cisse though sadly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Ronaldo, just curious, so you prefer a new defensive midfielder to replace Tiote and play alongside with Cabaye and Marveaux? No place for Sissoko? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Wouldn't mind Anita having a bash at a regular role in the middle. Aye, I think a lot of people have unfairly written him off. Pardew included too probably. Not according to his quotes, which we're supposed to take as gospel around here. Even the lies? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Because it's lacks everything, basically. I like Marveaux a lot and would find it very difficult to leave him out of any midfield I picked. Also it can be argued the midfield people are suggesting with doesn't have the right combination of abilities you'd want in a midfield 3 (though its also arguable that if setup correctly they have all shown most of the abilities required in the past) But "it lacks everything"?, not even close Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Moody Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Because it's lacks everything, basically. I like Marveaux a lot and would find it very difficult to leave him out of any midfield I picked. Also it can be argued the midfield people are suggesting with doesn't have the right combination of abilities you'd want in a midfield 3 (though its also arguable that if setup correctly they have all shown most of the abilities required in the past) But "it lacks everything"?, not even close It's really silly tbf. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 All these different combinations are liked, disliked for whatever reason. Funny thing though, all of them require the ball to be passed through them for any of them to be successful. If Pardew is going to bring in an Andy Carroll type, not much point in playing three in there anyway, the ball will be sailing over their heads anyhoo. Might as well go 4-4-2..ooof. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Al Moody Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 All these different combinations are liked, disliked for whatever reason. Funny thing though, all of them require the ball to be passed through them for any of them to be successful. If Pardew is going to bring in an Andy Carroll type, not much point in playing three in there anyway, the ball will be sailing over their heads anyhoo. Might as well go 4-4-2..ooof. So depressing, and true. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Because it's lacks everything, basically. I like Marveaux a lot and would find it very difficult to leave him out of any midfield I picked. Also it can be argued the midfield people are suggesting with doesn't have the right combination of abilities you'd want in a midfield 3 (though its also arguable that if setup correctly they have all shown most of the abilities required in the past) But "it lacks everything"?, not even close It's really silly tbf. Yeah but I do try to be nice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
colinmk Posted May 30, 2013 Share Posted May 30, 2013 Give that midfield to any decent manager and they could make it work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts