Guest Haris Vuckic Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 http://i.chzbgr.com/completestore/2012/4/9/fdc5922e-e040-4401-9670-aad2b93c3c3b.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 Ah no, the macum pillock is back. Seriously is anyone who considers the criminal thug Cattermole a decent footballer worth communicating with ? If so then perhaps we should change the title thread to his user name as he seems to have taken it over anyway. Cattermole used to be a dirty liability, but he has calmed down this season and actually played football. Lets be honest the sending of in the derby was a bit too far. Let's be honest he should have been off in the first minute. Can you justify Tiote's punch to Cattermole's face then? If you don't believe me I can provide video evidence. Please provide away. That's entrapment.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 Ah no, the macum pillock is back. Seriously is anyone who considers the criminal thug Cattermole a decent footballer worth communicating with ? If so then perhaps we should change the title thread to his user name as he seems to have taken it over anyway. Cattermole used to be a dirty liability, but he has calmed down this season and actually played football. Lets be honest the sending of in the derby was a bit too far. Let's be honest he should have been off in the first minute. Can you justify Tiote's punch to Cattermole's face then? If you don't believe me I can provide video evidence. Please provide away. That's entrapment.. Not really , he ticked the box to say he had read the rules when he signed up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,20035.0.html Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 Ah no, the macum pillock is back. Seriously is anyone who considers the criminal thug Cattermole a decent footballer worth communicating with ? If so then perhaps we should change the title thread to his user name as he seems to have taken it over anyway. Cattermole used to be a dirty liability, but he has calmed down this season and actually played football. Lets be honest the sending of in the derby was a bit too far. Let's be honest he should have been off in the first minute. Can you justify Tiote's punch to Cattermole's face then? If you don't believe me I can provide video evidence. Please provide away. That's entrapment.. Not really , he ticked the box to say he had read the rules when he signed up. ...and answered "How many days is the ban for posting football clips/streams/fixture lists on this forum?" with "14". Ah, Mackems. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 I, for one, feel kind of cheated that we didn't get to see his reply to brummie tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,20035.0.html He didn't start calling for a ban though, did he? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,20035.0.html So you'll get banned for 2 days under that rule too now. Wait, so will I, this is getting confusing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,20035.0.html So you'll get banned for 2 days under that rule too now. Wait, so will I, this is getting confusing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JH Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 http://www.newcastle-online.org/nufcforum/index.php/topic,20035.0.html So you'll get banned for 2 days under that rule too now. Wait, so will I, this is getting confusing. http://cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/400x/18146064.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 Reminds me of the bridge keeper in Monty Python and the holy grail.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 He hasn't been an arsehole, so I see no reason why to be one and treat him like one. Fair enough on the breaking the rules side of things, but the replies to him are a bit ott like. We're the ones who are supposed to be above that kind of reactionary, backwards shite man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 He hasn't been an arsehole, so I see no reason why to be one and treat him like one. Fair enough on the breaking the rules side of things, but the replies to him are a bit ott like. We're the ones who are supposed to be above that kind of reactionary, backwards shite man. With you. Like you say though the bans are fair enough. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest dogbeak Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 aye, this is more their level you cannat buy class like that like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LesPaul Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 Well played TT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 He hasn't been an arsehole, so I see no reason why to be one and treat him like one. Fair enough on the breaking the rules side of things, but the replies to him are a bit ott like. We're the ones who are supposed to be above that kind of reactionary, backwards shite man. Aye. The ammount of 'bites' any mackem posting on here gets is fucking ludicrous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Incognito Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 There is a great deal of difference between biting and debating. With Paxton , in the main, most were debating. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 There is a great deal of difference between biting and debating. With Paxton , in the main, most were debating. Mass debating ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gemmill Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 NO mods powerplay. :blush: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 There was about 5 replies to every post he made. As Wireside would say, people were definitely 'rattled'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 The justice league will be out in force again Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BooBoo Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 So, so gay. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fenham Mag Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 aye, this is more their level you cannat buy class like that like Howay man, they are only being fair to the older members who didn't have Internet forums in the 80's to discuss these hot topics (back then). Class personified. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCormick Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 That was petty as fuck TT. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest johnson293 Posted April 9, 2012 Share Posted April 9, 2012 Ah no, the macum pillock is back. Seriously is anyone who considers the criminal thug Cattermole a decent footballer worth communicating with ? If so then perhaps we should change the title thread to his user name as he seems to have taken it over anyway. Cattermole used to be a dirty liability, but he has calmed down this season and actually played football. Lets be honest the sending of in the derby was a bit too far. Let's be honest he should have been off in the first minute. Can you justify Tiote's punch to Cattermole's face then? If you don't believe me I can provide video evidence. Please provide away. That's entrapment.. Nah, TT merely asked for proof - Paxton was stupid enough to post the video, rather than simply explain where it could be found. He he, nice though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts